文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

在新版世界卫生组织分类和辅助放疗整合后,辛普森分级在脑膜瘤中的作用。

The role of Simpson grading in meningiomas after integration of the updated WHO classification and adjuvant radiotherapy.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Tuebingen, Eberhard-Karls-University Tuebingen, Hoppe-Seyler Street 3, Tuebingen, Germany.

Center for CNS Tumors, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tuebingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tuebingen, Eberhard-Karls-University Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.

出版信息

Neurosurg Rev. 2021 Aug;44(4):2329-2336. doi: 10.1007/s10143-020-01428-7. Epub 2020 Oct 26.


DOI:10.1007/s10143-020-01428-7
PMID:33104905
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8338836/
Abstract

Since the introduction of the Simpson grading for the extent of resection in meningiomas in 1957, its usefulness in modern neurosurgery has been challenged. Especially, the updated WHO classification regarding brain invasion and the efficacy of radiation therapy has not been taken into account when evaluating the prognostic role of the Simpson grading in this era. We analyzed the clinical and histopathological data of 1571 meningiomas that were surgically resected in the authors' institution between July 2003 and March 2017. Operative reports were reviewed regarding the extent of resection according to Simpson grading. Meningioma subtype according to the updated WHO classification of 2016 and clinical characteristics and time to tumor progression were analyzed. The mean follow-up was 38.4 months (range 1.2 to 195.6). A higher rate of tumor recurrence was observed for male gender, younger age, recurrent tumors, non-spinal tumor localization, higher WHO, and Simpson grades in the univariate analysis. In the multivariate analysis older age, recurrent tumors and higher WHO grades remained negative prognostic factors. Among the different Simpson grades, the relative risk for recurrence was highest for grade IV compared to all other grades (each p < 0.0001), while there was no difference between Simpson grades I and II. Adjuvant radiotherapy showed lower rates of tumor recurrence. Subtotal microsurgical resection remains an independent prognostic factor with a higher rate of tumor recurrence. The prognostic benefit of radical treatment of the dural attachment is questionable and needs to be considered when weighing the intraoperative risks of radicality.

摘要

自 1957 年辛普森(Simpson)分级系统用于脑膜瘤切除范围以来,其在现代神经外科中的作用受到了挑战。特别是,在评估辛普森分级在这个时代的预后作用时,没有考虑到世界卫生组织(WHO)关于脑侵犯的最新分类和放射治疗的疗效。我们分析了作者所在机构 2003 年 7 月至 2017 年 3 月间手术切除的 1571 例脑膜瘤的临床和组织病理学数据。根据辛普森分级,对手术报告中切除范围进行了回顾。按照 2016 年 WHO 最新分类,分析脑膜瘤亚型,以及临床特征和肿瘤进展时间。平均随访时间为 38.4 个月(范围 1.2 至 195.6)。单因素分析显示,男性、年龄较小、复发性肿瘤、非脊柱肿瘤定位、更高的 WHO 分级和辛普森分级与肿瘤复发率较高相关。多因素分析显示,年龄较大、复发性肿瘤和更高的 WHO 分级仍然是预后不良的因素。在不同的辛普森分级中,与所有其他分级相比,IV 级的复发风险相对最高(每次 p<0.0001),而 I 级和 II 级之间没有差异。辅助放疗显示肿瘤复发率较低。次全显微镜下切除仍然是一个独立的预后因素,肿瘤复发率较高。根治硬脑膜附着的治疗效果仍存在争议,在权衡根治术中的风险时需要考虑这一点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f07b/8338836/6bac20640142/10143_2020_1428_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f07b/8338836/b4bcf375c872/10143_2020_1428_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f07b/8338836/50b3628d8ae5/10143_2020_1428_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f07b/8338836/6bac20640142/10143_2020_1428_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f07b/8338836/b4bcf375c872/10143_2020_1428_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f07b/8338836/50b3628d8ae5/10143_2020_1428_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f07b/8338836/6bac20640142/10143_2020_1428_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

[1]
The role of Simpson grading in meningiomas after integration of the updated WHO classification and adjuvant radiotherapy.

Neurosurg Rev. 2021-8

[2]
Long-term survival analysis of atypical meningiomas: survival rates, prognostic factors, operative and radiotherapy treatment.

Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2014-8

[3]
Relevance of Simpson grading system and recurrence-free survival after surgery for World Health Organization Grade I meningioma.

J Neurosurg. 2016-4-8

[4]
The Simpson grading: defining the optimal threshold for gross total resection in meningioma surgery.

Neurosurg Rev. 2021-6

[5]
Is the Simpson Grading System Applicable to Estimate the Risk of Tumor Progression After Microsurgery for Recurrent Intracranial Meningioma?

World Neurosurg. 2018-11

[6]
The Simpson grading in meningioma surgery: does the tumor location influence the prognostic value?

J Neurooncol. 2017-7

[7]
Imaging and extent of surgical resection predict risk of meningioma recurrence better than WHO histopathological grade.

Neuro Oncol. 2016-6

[8]
Effect of dural detachment on long-term tumor control for meningiomas treated using Simpson grade IV resection.

J Neurosurg. 2013-9-20

[9]
Regrowth factors of WHO grade I skull base meningiomas following incomplete resection.

J Neurosurg. 2022-12-1

[10]
Is Simpson grade I removal necessary in all cases of spinal meningioma? Assessment of postoperative recurrence during long-term follow-up.

Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2014

引用本文的文献

[1]
Cranioplasty After Removal of a Meningioma With Skull Invasion: A Technical Case Report.

Cureus. 2025-5-21

[2]
An evidence-based framework for postoperative surveillance of meningioma.

Neurooncol Pract. 2024-12-2

[3]
Recurrence of Resected Skull Base Meningiomas during Long-term Follow-up: Incidence and Predisposing Factors.

J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2024-4-30

[4]
Malignant Meningiomas: From Diagnostics to Treatment.

Diagnostics (Basel). 2025-2-23

[5]
The Role of Simpson Grading System in Spinal Meningioma Surgery: Institutional Case Series, Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Cancers (Basel). 2024-12-26

[6]
Preoperative prediction of CNS WHO grade and tumour aggressiveness in intracranial meningioma based on radiomics and structured semantics.

Sci Rep. 2024-9-4

[7]
Resection vs. coagulation of dural attachment in patients with spinal meningioma: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2024-8-21

[8]
Unveiling an atypical meningioma amidst stroke symptoms: importance of accurate diagnosis and comprehensive follow-up: A case report.

Radiol Case Rep. 2024-6-28

[9]
Meningioma recurrence: Time for an online prediction tool?

Surg Neurol Int. 2024-5-10

[10]
Paired Primary and Recurrent Rhabdoid Meningiomas: Cytogenetic Alterations, Gene Expression Profile and Patient Outcome.

Biology (Basel). 2024-5-16

本文引用的文献

[1]
High Diagnostic Accuracy of Visible 5-ALA Fluorescence in Meningioma Surgery According to Histopathological Analysis of Tumor Bulk and Peritumoral Tissue.

Lasers Surg Med. 2021-3

[2]
Benefits of re-do surgery for recurrent intracranial meningiomas.

Sci Rep. 2020-1-15

[3]
Fluorescence-guided resection in bone and soft tissue infiltrating meningiomas.

Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2020-3

[4]
Oncologic benefits of dural resection in spinal meningiomas: a meta-analysis of Simpson grades and recurrence rates.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2019-11-8

[5]
CBTRUS Statistical Report: Primary Brain and Other Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2012-2016.

Neuro Oncol. 2019-11-1

[6]
Survival impacts of extent of resection and adjuvant radiotherapy for the modern management of high-grade meningiomas.

J Neurooncol. 2019-9-6

[7]
Advances in multidisciplinary therapy for meningiomas.

Neuro Oncol. 2019-1-14

[8]
Erratum. Intermediate-risk meningioma: initial outcomes from NRG Oncology RTOG 0539.

J Neurosurg. 2018-12-1

[9]
Intermediate-risk meningioma: initial outcomes from NRG Oncology RTOG 0539.

J Neurosurg. 2017-10-6

[10]
EANO guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of meningiomas.

Lancet Oncol. 2016-8-30

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索