• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

验证初级保健路径模型在管理骨科损伤方面的有效性:一项前瞻性的昆士兰研究结果。

Validation of the Primary Care Pathway Model for Management of Orthopedic Injuries: Results of a Prospective, Queensland Study.

机构信息

Redcliffe Hospital, Redcliffe, Queensland, Australia.

Mater Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

J Prim Care Community Health. 2020 Jan-Dec;11:2150132720967228. doi: 10.1177/2150132720967228.

DOI:10.1177/2150132720967228
PMID:33106089
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7786413/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

A "virtual fracture clinic" (VFC) is viewed as a safe, cost effective method of managing suitable low risk orthopedic injuries without direct orthopedic review. This method is used throughout the Glasgow Royal Infirmary (GRI) and National Health System (NHS) as a cornerstone for efficient patient care. This study assessed the outcomes of a newly implemented Queensland based Primary Care Pathway (PCP) for management of simple orthopedic injuries.

METHODS

A prospective cohort was formed of patients presenting over a 4-week period with an acute orthopedic injury to either the Emergency Department (ED) or Primary Care Providers within the Logan Hospital catchment in Queensland, Australia. Patients were triaged to either a PCP management protocol with General Practitioners (GP), Allied-Health Professionals (AHP) or to a traditional in-person Fracture Clinic (FC) orthopedic review. Patients were followed for 6-months. Data were collected about epidemiology, complications, appropriate allocation, and injury type.

RESULTS

A total of 1283 patients were referred over the study period, of which 267 were triaged to PCP management. ED referrals accounted for 62.5% of appropriate referrals to either clinic. Upper limb injuries were the most common conditions managed through the PCP. Patients managed by the PCP model of care experienced a 4.29% complication rate over the 6-month follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

The PCP model of care is effective in managing criteria specific, low risk orthopedic injuries with a low rate of complications (4.29%) without direct orthopedic FC review. Use of a PCP reduces demand on hospital resources, and provides a safe, cost-effective alternative to a resource-restricted outpatient service.

摘要

目的

“虚拟骨折门诊”(VFC)被视为一种安全且具有成本效益的方法,可在无需直接骨科评估的情况下管理合适的低风险骨科损伤。这种方法在格拉斯哥皇家医院(GRI)和国民保健制度(NHS)中被广泛应用,是高效患者护理的基石。本研究评估了昆士兰州新实施的初级保健途径(PCP)在管理简单骨科损伤方面的结果。

方法

在澳大利亚昆士兰州洛根医院收治范围内,对在 4 周内因急性骨科损伤到急诊科(ED)或初级保健提供者就诊的患者进行前瞻性队列研究。患者分诊至由全科医生(GP)、联合保健专业人员(AHP)管理的 PCP 管理方案,或传统的门诊骨折门诊(FC)骨科评估。对患者进行 6 个月的随访。收集有关流行病学、并发症、适当分配和损伤类型的数据。

结果

在研究期间共转介了 1283 例患者,其中 267 例分诊至 PCP 管理。ED 转介占这两个诊所适当转介的 62.5%。上肢损伤是通过 PCP 管理的最常见疾病。通过 PCP 管理模式治疗的患者在 6 个月的随访期间并发症发生率为 4.29%。

结论

PCP 管理模式可有效管理特定标准、低风险的骨科损伤,并发症发生率低(4.29%),无需直接进行骨科 FC 评估。使用 PCP 可减少对医院资源的需求,并为资源有限的门诊服务提供安全、具有成本效益的替代方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d38/7786413/7160fb2c0841/10.1177_2150132720967228-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d38/7786413/208bb77e6dae/10.1177_2150132720967228-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d38/7786413/7160fb2c0841/10.1177_2150132720967228-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d38/7786413/208bb77e6dae/10.1177_2150132720967228-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d38/7786413/7160fb2c0841/10.1177_2150132720967228-fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Validation of the Primary Care Pathway Model for Management of Orthopedic Injuries: Results of a Prospective, Queensland Study.验证初级保健路径模型在管理骨科损伤方面的有效性:一项前瞻性的昆士兰研究结果。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2020 Jan-Dec;11:2150132720967228. doi: 10.1177/2150132720967228.
2
Do all adult orthopaedic injuries seen in emergency departments need to attend fracture clinic? A Queensland multicentred review.急诊科所见的所有成人骨科损伤都需要去骨折诊所就诊吗?昆士兰多中心综述。
Emerg Med Australas. 2017 Dec;29(6):658-663. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.12811. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
3
Primary care pathway- a novel way to reduce the burden on orthopaedic fracture clinics within the pediatric subgroup: A Queensland multi-centered review.初级保健途径——一种减轻儿科亚组骨科骨折门诊负担的新方法:昆士兰多中心回顾。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Dec 24;99(52):e23763. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023763.
4
Electronic referrals for virtual fracture clinic service using the National Integrated Medical Imaging System (NIMIS).使用国家综合医学成像系统(NIMIS)进行虚拟骨折诊所服务的电子转诊。
Ir J Med Sci. 2019 May;188(2):371-377. doi: 10.1007/s11845-018-1901-3. Epub 2018 Sep 18.
5
Optimizing orthopedic trauma care delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic. A closed-loop audit of implementing a virtual fracture clinic and fast-track pathway in a Dutch level 2 trauma center.在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间优化骨科创伤护理服务。荷兰一家二级创伤中心实施虚拟骨折诊所和快速通道的闭环审计。
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2021 Oct 4;6(1):e000691. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2021-000691. eCollection 2021.
6
Emergency department after-hours primary contact physiotherapy service reduces analgesia and orthopaedic referrals while improving treatment times.夜间急诊初级联系物理治疗服务减少了镇痛药和骨科转诊,同时缩短了治疗时间。
Aust Health Rev. 2020 Jun;44(3):485-492. doi: 10.1071/AH18259.
7
Retrospective cohort study evaluating the efficacy and safety of an orthopaedic consultant-led virtual fracture clinic in an Australian level 1 trauma centre.回顾性队列研究评估了在澳大利亚一级创伤中心由骨科顾问主导的虚拟骨折门诊的疗效和安全性。
ANZ J Surg. 2021 Jul;91(7-8):1441-1446. doi: 10.1111/ans.16574. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
8
Cost comparison of orthopaedic fracture pathways using discrete event simulation in a Glasgow hospital.格拉斯哥一家医院采用离散事件模拟对骨科骨折治疗路径进行成本比较。
BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 7;7(9):e014509. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014509.
9
Remote Delivery of the Satellite Virtual Fracture Clinic - a Pilot Report of the First 500 Cases.远程传送卫星虚拟骨折门诊——500 例首例报告
Injury. 2021 Apr;52(4):782-786. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.11.055. Epub 2020 Nov 21.
10
Virtual Fracture Clinics in Orthopaedic Surgery - A Systematic Review of Current Evidence.骨科虚拟骨折门诊 - 现有证据的系统评价。
Injury. 2020 Dec;51(12):2757-2762. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.11.001. Epub 2020 Nov 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Joint Efforts: A Review of Large Joint and Bursa Steroid Injections and Aspirations by Primary Care Physicians.共同努力:基层医疗医生对大关节和滑囊类固醇注射及抽吸的综述
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Apr 17. doi: 10.1007/s11606-025-09490-x.
2
Evaluation of Outpatient Procedures Simulation Curriculum for Internal Medicine Residents.内科住院医师门诊操作模拟课程评估
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Feb 25. doi: 10.1007/s11606-025-09394-w.
3
Streamlining the Management of Children with Simple Hand Injuries.简化单纯手部损伤儿童的管理

本文引用的文献

1
Are Unnecessary Serial Radiographs Being Ordered in Children with Distal Radius Buckle Fractures?对于桡骨远端青枝骨折的儿童,是否存在不必要的系列X线片检查?
Radiol Res Pract. 2018 Mar 1;2018:5143639. doi: 10.1155/2018/5143639. eCollection 2018.
2
Do all adult orthopaedic injuries seen in emergency departments need to attend fracture clinic? A Queensland multicentred review.急诊科所见的所有成人骨科损伤都需要去骨折诊所就诊吗?昆士兰多中心综述。
Emerg Med Australas. 2017 Dec;29(6):658-663. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.12811. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
3
Fracture clinic redesign reduces the cost of outpatient orthopaedic trauma care.
Plast Surg (Oakv). 2024 Apr 28;33(3):442-448. doi: 10.1177/22925503241249755. eCollection 2025 Aug.
4
Pediatric Hand Fracture Outcomes: How Often Do We Need to Operate?小儿手部骨折的治疗结果:我们需要多频繁地进行手术?
Plast Surg (Oakv). 2024 Feb;32(1):86-91. doi: 10.1177/22925503221085076. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
5
Health Care Professionals' Experiences With a Mobile Self-Care Solution for Low Complex Orthopedic Injuries: Mixed Methods Study.医疗保健专业人员使用移动自我护理解决方案治疗低复杂度骨科损伤的体验:混合方法研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024 Feb 2;12:e51510. doi: 10.2196/51510.
6
Direct discharge for children with a greenstick or torus fracture of the wrist is a non-inferior satisfactory solution to traditional treatment.对于手腕青枝骨折或骨皮质增厚骨折的儿童,直接出院是一种不亚于传统治疗的令人满意的解决方案。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Dec;50(6):2663-2671. doi: 10.1007/s00068-023-02391-w. Epub 2024 Jan 13.
骨折门诊改造降低了骨科创伤门诊的成本。
Bone Joint Res. 2016 Feb;5(2):33-6. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.52.2000506.
4
Satisfaction and functional outcome with "self-care" for the management of fifth metacarpal fractures.第五掌骨骨折“自我护理”管理的满意度及功能结果
Hand (N Y). 2015 Dec;10(4):607-12. doi: 10.1007/s11552-015-9749-8. Epub 2015 Feb 18.
5
Fifth metatarsal fractures - Is routine follow-up necessary?第五跖骨骨折——是否需要常规随访?
Injury. 2015 Aug;46(8):1664-8. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.05.041. Epub 2015 May 27.
6
Functional outcome and satisfaction with a "self-care" protocol for the management of mallet finger injuries: a case-series.锤状指损伤“自我护理”方案的功能结局与满意度:病例系列研究
J Trauma Manag Outcomes. 2014 Dec 10;8(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s13032-014-0021-y. eCollection 2014.
7
Effect of a redesigned fracture management pathway and 'virtual' fracture clinic on ED performance.重新设计的骨折管理路径和“虚拟”骨折诊所对急诊科表现的影响。
BMJ Open. 2014 Jun 13;4(6):e005282. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005282.
8
A new "virtual" patient pathway for the management of radial head and neck fractures.桡骨头颈骨折管理的新“虚拟”患者路径。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Mar;23(3):297-301. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.11.006.
9
Health-related quality of life (EQ-5D) before and after orthopedic surgery.骨科手术后健康相关生活质量(EQ-5D)的变化。
Acta Orthop. 2011 Feb;82(1):82-9. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2010.548026. Epub 2010 Dec 29.
10
Identifying and avoiding bias in research.识别和避免研究中的偏见。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Aug;126(2):619-625. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181de24bc.