Rickels K, Chung H R, Csanalosi I B, Hurowitz A M, London J, Wiseman K, Kaplan M, Amsterdam J D
Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1987 Oct;44(10):862-6. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1987.01800220024005.
Two hundred forty-one outpatients with a DSM-III diagnosis of major depressive disorder participated in a six-week double-blind therapeutic trial of alprazolam, diazepam, imipramine hydrochloride, and placebo. Side effects were given as a major reason for attrition by patients taking the three active compounds and ineffectiveness was the reason given by patients taking placebo. Imipramine-treated patients reported the most and placebo patients the least number of adverse effects. Imipramine and alprazolam, but not diazepam, produced significantly more improvement in depressed symptomatology than did placebo. Mean diazepam scores frequently assumed an intermediate position between those of imipramine or alprazolam and placebo. These treatment differences were found to be independent of initial severity levels of anxiety and depression.
241名被诊断患有DSM-III重度抑郁症的门诊患者参与了一项为期六周的阿普唑仑、地西泮、盐酸丙咪嗪和安慰剂的双盲治疗试验。服用三种活性化合物的患者将副作用作为退出试验的主要原因,而服用安慰剂的患者则将无效作为退出原因。丙咪嗪治疗的患者报告的不良反应最多,安慰剂组患者报告的不良反应最少。与安慰剂相比,丙咪嗪和阿普唑仑,但不是地西泮,在抑郁症状方面有显著更多的改善。地西泮的平均得分经常处于丙咪嗪或阿普唑仑与安慰剂得分之间的中间位置。发现这些治疗差异与焦虑和抑郁的初始严重程度无关。