Shruthi D P, Patil G S, Prithviraj D R
Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Government Dental College & Research Institute, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Dayananda Sagar College of Dental Sciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Contemp Clin Dent. 2020 Jan-Mar;11(1):15-19. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_46_19. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
Orthodontic treatment is a long-term procedure that involves the usage of brackets and archwires which are mainly metallic in nature. This study evaluated the levels of metal ions release from bonded and nonbonded orthodontic brackets after immersion in distilled deionized water and three different types of mouthwash.
Eighty premolar stainless steel brackets (3M, Unitek) were divided into Group A (bonded brackets) and Group B (nonbonded brackets). Each group was further subdivided into four subgroups to analyze the release of ions from three different types of mouthwash along with the control group. All the samples were incubated at 37°C for 45 days, and immersion solutions were tested in inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometer for the release of free metal ions.
Mean ion release in the bonded bracket group was less than that of nonbonded bracket group. Ion release in control subgroup of both groups was 0.18 ± 0.08 μg/dl (A1) and 0.17 ± 0.06 μg/dl (B1); in Phos-Flur mouthwash subgroup was 0.12 ± 0.06 μg/dl (A2) and 0.13 ± 0.05 μg/dl (B2); in chlohex mouthwash subgroup was 0.13 ± 0.06 μg/dl (A3) and 0.14 ± 0.06 μg/dl (B3); in Hiora mouthwash subgroup was 0.10 ± 0.06 μg/dl (A4) and 0.12 ± 0.05 μg/dl (B4).
The mean ion release was the highest in deionized water (control group) followed by chlohex, Phos-Flur, and Hiora in both Group A and Group B. Ion leaching from bonded brackets was less compared to nonbonded brackets in all different mouthwashes except in the control group. However, this difference was statistically insignificant ( > 0.05) between all the groups.
正畸治疗是一个长期过程,涉及使用主要为金属材质的托槽和弓丝。本研究评估了粘结和未粘结的正畸托槽在蒸馏水和三种不同类型漱口水浸泡后释放金属离子的水平。
80个前磨牙不锈钢托槽(3M,Unitek)分为A组(粘结托槽)和B组(未粘结托槽)。每组再进一步细分为四个亚组,以分析三种不同类型漱口水以及对照组中离子的释放情况。所有样本在37°C下孵育45天,浸泡溶液在电感耦合等离子体发射光谱仪中检测游离金属离子的释放。
粘结托槽组的平均离子释放量低于未粘结托槽组。两组对照组的离子释放量分别为0.18±0.08μg/dl(A1)和0.17±0.06μg/dl(B1);在含氟漱口水亚组中分别为0.12±0.06μg/dl(A2)和0.13±0.05μg/dl(B2);在洗必泰漱口水亚组中分别为0.13±0.06μg/dl(A3)和0.14±0.06μg/dl(B3);在含过氧化氢漱口水亚组中分别为0.10±0.06μg/dl(A4)和0.12±0.05μg/dl(B4)。
A组和B组中,去离子水(对照组)中的平均离子释放量最高,其次是洗必泰、含氟漱口水和含过氧化氢漱口水。除对照组外,在所有不同漱口中,粘结托槽的离子浸出量均低于未粘结托槽。然而,所有组之间的这种差异在统计学上不显著(>0.05)。