Theruveethi Nagarajan, Ve Ramesh S, Srinivasan Krithica
Department of Optometry, Manipal College of Health Professions, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Taiwan J Ophthalmol. 2019 Sep 17;10(3):212-216. doi: 10.4103/tjo.tjo_36_19. eCollection 2020 Jul-Sep.
There is a need to understand the requirement for the post-mydriatic test (PMT) among adults for the final prescription of spectacles as this test increases the cost of eye care and causes inconvenience to the patient because of the additional visit to an eye care practitioner. We aim to compare the cycloplegic subjective refraction using apertures of various sizes and PMT in an adult population.
This prospective crossover study was conducted under standard settings in an eye clinic. Adult individuals between 18 and 35 years of with emmetropia and various degrees of ametropia participated in this study. Individuals with known ocular pathology were excluded. Non-cycloplegic objective refraction was performed followed by subjective refraction. Cycloplegic objective refraction was performed followed by subjective refraction with custom designed artificial apertures. After a washout period of cycloplegic, PMT was performed. The distribution of data was tested using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Depending on the distribution of the data, either parametric or nonparametric test was done.
Fifty-nine eyes of thirty individuals with a mean (±SD) age of 23(±4) years with a male: female ratio of 1:4 participated in this study. A comparison of measures of PMT and subjective refraction with 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 mm aperture under cycloplegic effect using the Friedman test rendered a Chi square value (df = 5) of 1.92 which was not statistically different ( = 0.86).
Performing subjective refraction with an appropriate spherical and cylindrical endpoint under cycloplegic effect with appropriate aperture overcomes the necessity of PMT.
由于散瞳后验光检查(PMT)会增加眼部护理成本,且因患者需要额外就诊于眼科医生而给患者带来不便,因此有必要了解成年人配镜最终处方时对该检查的需求。我们旨在比较成年人群中使用不同尺寸孔径的睫状肌麻痹主观验光和散瞳后验光检查。
这项前瞻性交叉研究在眼科诊所的标准环境下进行。年龄在18至35岁之间、有正视和不同程度屈光不正的成年人参与了本研究。已知有眼部病变的个体被排除在外。先进行非睫状肌麻痹客观验光,然后进行主观验光。接着进行睫状肌麻痹客观验光,之后使用定制设计的人工孔径进行主观验光。在睫状肌麻痹的洗脱期后,进行散瞳后验光检查。使用柯尔莫哥洛夫-斯米尔诺夫检验来测试数据分布。根据数据分布情况,进行参数检验或非参数检验。
30名个体的59只眼睛参与了本研究,平均(±标准差)年龄为23(±4)岁,男女比例为1:4。使用弗里德曼检验对睫状肌麻痹作用下2、3、4、5和6毫米孔径的散瞳后验光检查和主观验光测量值进行比较,得到卡方值(自由度 = 5)为1.92,无统计学差异(P = 0.86)。
在睫状肌麻痹作用下,使用合适的孔径并以适当的球镜和柱镜终点进行主观验光,可消除散瞳后验光检查的必要性。