Suppr超能文献

在矫正屈光柱镜成分之前可以使用红绿双色试验吗?

Can the red-green duochrome test be used prior to correcting the refractive cylinder component?

作者信息

Gantz Liat, Schrader Shlomo, Ruben Ruthie, Zivotofsky Ari Z

机构信息

Department of Optometry and Vision Science, Hadassah Academic College, Jerusalem, Israel.

Department of Optometry, Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2015 Mar 16;10(3):e0118874. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118874. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

PURPOSE

A primary task of the eye care professional is determining the refraction, or optical correction, of a patient. The duochrome red-green test is a standard tool for verification of the final refraction. Traditionally, it is recommended for use both prior to and subsequent to determining the cylindrical or astigmatic component of the refraction. In order for it to be effective when used before correcting the cylinder it is necessary that the COLC (Circle of Least Confusion) be on the retina. This study examined whether it is necessarily true that the duochrome response in uncorrected astigmatism will be as trust-worthy as it is with corrected cylinders.

METHODS

The red-green examination was performed monocularly under the following three conditions: a. fully corrected refraction for the subgroup of eyes that had spherical refractions and for the subgroup of eyes with sphero-cylindrical refractions. b. best sphere-only correction without cylinder correction in sphero-cylindrical eyes c. an induced cylinder error in spherical eyes. The interval between the last "red" response and the first "green" response for the right eyes as a group and separately for the physiological cylinder and induced cylinder correction sub-groups was calculated and compared using a paired, two-tailed t-test.

RESULTS

The intervals between "red" and "green" responses were not significantly different in the population as a whole and in the uncorrected physiological cylinder and induced cylinder subgroups examined.

CONCLUSION

Based on the finding that the interval of red-green equality with fully corrected cylinder and without the cylindrical correction are not significantly different, the red-green duochrome test can indeed be used both before and after cylindrical correction.

摘要

目的

眼科护理专业人员的一项主要任务是确定患者的屈光不正或验光矫正。红绿双色试验是验证最终验光结果的标准工具。传统上,建议在确定屈光不正的柱镜或散光成分之前和之后使用。为了在矫正柱镜之前使用时有效,必须使最小弥散圆(COLC)位于视网膜上。本研究调查了在未矫正散光情况下的双色反应是否真的与矫正柱镜时一样可靠。

方法

在以下三种情况下单眼进行红绿检查:a. 对单纯球镜屈光不正的眼亚组和球柱镜屈光不正的眼亚组进行完全矫正的屈光检查。b. 对球柱镜眼仅进行最佳球镜矫正而不进行柱镜矫正。c. 在单纯球镜眼中诱导柱镜误差。计算右眼作为一个整体以及分别针对生理性柱镜和诱导性柱镜矫正亚组的最后一次“红色”反应与第一次“绿色”反应之间的间隔,并使用配对双尾t检验进行比较。

结果

在整个群体以及所检查的未矫正生理性柱镜和诱导性柱镜亚组中,“红色”和“绿色”反应之间的间隔没有显著差异。

结论

基于完全矫正柱镜和未矫正柱镜时红绿相等间隔无显著差异这一发现,红绿双色试验确实可在柱镜矫正之前和之后使用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验