Suppr超能文献

对预测急性呼吸窘迫综合征死亡率的呼吸机调整的反应。驱动压与氧合。

Response to Ventilator Adjustments for Predicting Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Mortality. Driving Pressure versus Oxygenation.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Intensive Care Unit, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2021 May;18(5):857-864. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202007-862OC.

Abstract

Clinicians commonly use short-term physiologic markers to assess the benefit of ventilator adjustments. Improved arterial oxygen tension/pressure (Pa)/fraction of inspired oxygen (Fi) after ventilator adjustment in acute respiratory distress syndrome is associated with lower mortality. However, as driving pressure (ΔP) reflects lung stress and strain, changes in ΔP may more accurately reflect benefits or harms of ventilator adjustments compared with changes in oxygenation. We aimed to compare the association between mortality and the changes in Pa/Fi and ΔP following protocolized ventilator changes. We assessed associations between mortality and changes in Pa/Fi (ΔPa/Fi) and ΔP (ΔΔP) after postrandomization positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and tidal volume adjustment in reanalyses of the ALVEOLI (Assessment of Low Tidal Volume and Elevated End-Expiratory Volume to Obviate Lung Injury) and ExPress (Expiratory Pressure) trials. We included subjects with available pre- and postintervention Pa/Fi and ΔP (372 in ALVEOLI and 596 in ExPress). In each separate trial cohort, we performed multivariable Cox regression testing the association between ΔPa/Fi and ΔΔP with mortality. In ALVEOLI, when analyzed as separate variables, ΔPa/Fi was associated with mortality only in subjects in whom PEEP increased, whereas ΔΔP was associated with mortality irrespective of direction of PEEP change. When modeled together, improved ΔPa/Fi was not associated with mortality, whereas ΔΔP remained associated with mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.50 per 5 cm HO increase; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.21-1.85). When modeled together in ExPress, ΔΔP (aHR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.14-1.78) was more strongly associated with mortality than ΔPa/Fi (aHR, 0.95 per 25 mm Hg increase; 95% CI, 0.90-1.00). Reduced ΔP following protocolized ventilator changes was more strongly and consistently associated with lower mortality than was increased Pa/Fi, making ΔΔP more informative about benefit from ventilator adjustments. Our results reinforce the primacy of ΔP, rather than oxygenation, as the key variable associated with outcome.

摘要

临床医生通常使用短期生理标志物来评估呼吸机调整的效果。急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者在呼吸机调整后动脉血氧分压/压力(Pa)/吸入氧分数(Fi)改善与死亡率降低相关。然而,由于驱动压(ΔP)反映了肺的应激和应变,与氧合变化相比,ΔP 的变化可能更准确地反映呼吸机调整的益处或危害。我们旨在比较程序性呼吸机改变后 Pa/Fi 和 ΔP 变化与死亡率之间的关联。我们评估了 Reanalyses of the ALVEOLI(Assessment of Low Tidal Volume and Elevated End-Expiratory Volume to Obviate Lung Injury)和 ExPress(Expiratory Pressure)试验中随机化后呼气末正压(PEEP)和潮气量调整后死亡率与 Pa/Fi(ΔPa/Fi)和ΔP(ΔΔP)变化之间的关联。我们纳入了有预干预和干预后 Pa/Fi 和 ΔP 数据的受试者(ALVEOLI 中 372 例,ExPress 中 596 例)。在每个单独的试验队列中,我们使用多变量 Cox 回归检验了ΔPa/Fi 和 ΔΔP 与死亡率之间的关联。在 ALVEOLI 中,当作为单独变量进行分析时,仅在 PEEP 增加的患者中ΔPa/Fi 与死亡率相关,而 ΔΔP 与死亡率相关,与 PEEP 变化方向无关。当一起建模时,改善的ΔPa/Fi 与死亡率无关,而ΔΔP 仍与死亡率相关(调整后的危险比[aHR],每增加 5 cm H2O 增加 1.50;95%置信区间[95%CI],1.21-1.85)。当在 ExPress 中一起建模时,ΔΔP(aHR,1.42;95%CI,1.14-1.78)与死亡率的相关性强于ΔPa/Fi(aHR,每增加 25mmHg 增加 0.95;95%CI,0.90-1.00)。与增加 Pa/Fi 相比,程序性呼吸机改变后 ΔP 的降低与死亡率降低的相关性更强且更一致,这表明ΔΔP 更能反映呼吸机调整的益处。我们的结果强调了 ΔP 而不是氧合作用作为与结局相关的关键变量的首要地位。

相似文献

2
Disassociating Lung Mechanics and Oxygenation in Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.
Crit Care Med. 2017 Jul;45(7):1232-1239. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002406.
4
Association between (ΔPaO2/FiO2)/PEEP and in-hospital mortality in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia: A secondary analysis.
PLoS One. 2024 May 31;19(5):e0304518. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304518. eCollection 2024.
8
Airway and Transpulmonary Driving Pressure by End-Inspiratory Holds During Pressure Support Ventilation.
Respir Care. 2023 Nov;68(11):1483-1492. doi: 10.4187/respcare.10802. Epub 2023 Jul 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Driving pressure in acute respiratory distress syndrome for developing a protective lung strategy: A systematic review.
World J Crit Care Med. 2025 Jun 9;14(2):101377. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v14.i2.101377.
2
Improved understanding of the respiratory drive pathophysiology could lead to earlier spontaneous breathing in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome.
Eur J Anaesthesiol Intensive Care. 2023 Aug 24;2(5):e0030. doi: 10.1097/EA9.0000000000000030. eCollection 2023 Oct.
3
Oxygenation or Driving Pressure for Setting PEEP in Obese Patients With COVID-19 ARDS.
Respir Care. 2023 Jan 30;68(2):260-264. doi: 10.4187/respcare.10127.
4
Positive end-expiratory pressure optimization in ARDS: physiological evidence, bedside methods and clinical applications.
Intensive Care Med. 2024 May;50(5):762-765. doi: 10.1007/s00134-024-07397-5. Epub 2024 Apr 3.
7
Pronation Reveals a Heterogeneous Response of Global and Regional Respiratory Mechanics in Patients With Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure.
Crit Care Explor. 2023 Oct 2;5(10):e0983. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000983. eCollection 2023 Oct.
8
Setting the optimal positive end-expiratory pressure: a narrative review.
Front Vet Sci. 2023 Jul 19;10:1083290. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1083290. eCollection 2023.
10
Physiologic Markers of Disease Severity in ARDS.
Respir Care. 2023 Nov 25;68(12):1708-1718. doi: 10.4187/respcare.11100.

本文引用的文献

1
Early Neuromuscular Blockade in the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.
N Engl J Med. 2019 May 23;380(21):1997-2008. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1901686. Epub 2019 May 19.
3
Positive End-expiratory Pressure and Mechanical Power.
Anesthesiology. 2019 Jan;130(1):119-130. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002458.
5
Fifty Years of Research in ARDS. Setting Positive End-Expiratory Pressure in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Jun 1;195(11):1429-1438. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201610-2035CI.
7
High PEEP levels are associated with overdistension and tidal recruitment/derecruitment in ARDS patients.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2015 Oct;59(9):1161-9. doi: 10.1111/aas.12563. Epub 2015 Jun 10.
8
Driving pressure and survival in the acute respiratory distress syndrome.
N Engl J Med. 2015 Feb 19;372(8):747-55. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1410639.
9
Physiologic Responsiveness Should Guide Entry into Randomized Controlled Trials.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015 Dec 15;192(12):1416-9. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201410-1832CP.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验