• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

繁荣量表在加拿大大量青少年样本中的测量不变性。

Measurement Invariance of the Flourishing Scale among a Large Sample of Canadian Adolescents.

机构信息

School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada.

Department of Health Sciences, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, Canada.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 25;17(21):7800. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17217800.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph17217800
PMID:33113772
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7663739/
Abstract

Our aim was to examine measurement invariance of the Flourishing Scale (FS)-a concise measure of psychological wellbeing-across two study samples and by population characteristics among Canadian adolescents. Data were retrieved from 74,501 Canadian secondary school students in Year 7 (2018-2019) of the COMPASS Study and from the original validation of the FS ( = 689). We assessed measurement invariance using a confirmatory factor analysis in which increasingly stringent equality constraints were specified for model parameters between the following groups: study sample (i.e., adolescents vs. adults), gender, grade, and ethno-racial identity. In all models, full measurement invariance of the FS across all sub-groups was demonstrated. Our findings support the validity of the FS for measuring psychological wellbeing among Canadian adolescents in secondary school. Observed differences in FS score among subgroups therefore represent true differences in wellbeing rather than artifacts of differential interpretation.

摘要

我们的目的是检验 Flourishing Scale(FS)——一种简洁的心理幸福感衡量标准——在两个研究样本和加拿大青少年的人口特征中的测量不变性。数据来自于 COMPASS 研究的 74501 名加拿大中学 7 年级(2018-2019 年)的学生和 FS 的原始验证(n=689)。我们使用验证性因素分析来评估测量不变性,其中在以下组之间为模型参数指定了越来越严格的相等约束:研究样本(即青少年与成年人)、性别、年级和族裔身份。在所有模型中,FS 在所有子组中的完全测量不变性都得到了证明。我们的研究结果支持 FS 在加拿大中学青少年中测量心理幸福感的有效性。因此,子组之间 FS 得分的差异代表了幸福感的真实差异,而不是解释差异的假象。

相似文献

1
Measurement Invariance of the Flourishing Scale among a Large Sample of Canadian Adolescents.繁荣量表在加拿大大量青少年样本中的测量不变性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 25;17(21):7800. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17217800.
2
Measurement invariance properties and external construct validity of the short Warwick-Edinburgh mental wellbeing scale in a large national sample of secondary school students in Wales.在威尔士一个大型的中学生全国样本中,短版华威-爱丁堡心理健康量表的测量不变性特征和外部结构效度。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019 Aug 14;17(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s12955-019-1204-z.
3
Adaptation and Measurement Invariance by Gender of the Flourishing Scale in a Colombian Sample.《哥伦比亚样本中繁荣量表的性别适应性和测量不变性》
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 6;18(5):2664. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052664.
4
Psychometric Properties of the Flourishing Scale and Measurement Invariance Between Two Samples of Spanish University Students.蓬勃发展量表的心理测量特性及西班牙大学生两个样本间的测量不变性
Eval Health Prof. 2017 Dec;40(4):409-424. doi: 10.1177/0163278717703446. Epub 2017 Apr 19.
5
Searching for the HERO in Youth: Does Psychological Capital (PsyCap) Predict Mental Health Symptoms and Subjective Wellbeing in Australian School-Aged Children and Adolescents?探寻青少年中的“英雄”:心理资本(PsyCap)能否预测澳大利亚学龄儿童和青少年的心理健康症状和主观幸福感?
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2020 Dec;51(6):1025-1036. doi: 10.1007/s10578-020-01023-3.
6
Measurement invariance of the short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale and latent mean differences (SWEMWBS) in young people by current care status.短式 Warwick-Edinburgh 心理健康量表(SWEMWBS)在年轻人中的测量不变性与当前照顾状态的潜在均值差异。
Qual Life Res. 2022 Jan;31(1):205-213. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-02896-0. Epub 2021 May 28.
7
Validation of the Children's Intrinsic Needs Satisfaction Scale among Canadian youth: psychometric properties, criterion-related validity and multitrait multimethod confirmatory factor analysis.验证加拿大青少年内在需求满足量表的心理测量特性、效标关联效度和多特质多方法验证性因子分析。
Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can. 2019 Jan;39(1):25-32. doi: 10.24095/hpcdp.39.1.03.
8
Prevention of alcohol use in middle school students: psychometric assessment of the decisional balance inventory.预防中学生饮酒:决策平衡量表的心理测量评估。
Addict Behav. 2011 May;36(5):543-6. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2011.01.010. Epub 2011 Jan 20.
9
Social Emotional Health Survey-Secondary (SEHS-S): A Universal Screening Measure of Social-Emotional Strengths for Spanish-Speaking Adolescents.社会情绪健康调查-中学版(SEHS-S):西班牙语青少年社会情感优势的通用筛查工具。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 7;16(24):4982. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16244982.
10
Psychometric properties of the Shirom-Melamed Burnout Measure (SMBM) among adolescents: results from three cross-sectional studies.青少年 Shirom-Melamed 倦怠量表(SMBM)的心理测量特性:三项横断面研究的结果。
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Aug 25;18(1):266. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1841-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychometric validation of a culturally adapted health belief model scale for breast cancer screening in Chinese women.针对中国女性乳腺癌筛查的文化适应性健康信念模型量表的心理测量学验证
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 3;20(9):e0331279. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0331279. eCollection 2025.
2
Psychometric Properties and the Network Analysis of the Turkish Version of the Multidimensional Flourishing Scale: Associations with Psychological Distress.多维蓬勃发展量表土耳其语版本的心理测量特性与网络分析:与心理困扰的关联
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jun 11;15(6):800. doi: 10.3390/bs15060800.
3
Validation of the ecological momentary well-being instrument (EMOWI) in Canadian adolescents.加拿大青少年生态瞬时幸福感量表(EMOWI)的验证
Qual Life Res. 2025 Jun 12. doi: 10.1007/s11136-025-04001-1.
4
Relations between a social emotional learning (SEL) program and changes in resilience, self-esteem, and psychological flourishing in a youth sample.一项青少年样本中社会情感学习(SEL)项目与心理韧性、自尊及心理幸福感变化之间的关系。
Discov Ment Health. 2025 Mar 27;5(1):43. doi: 10.1007/s44192-025-00173-x.
5
Flourishing levels among health and non-health profession students in Saudi Arabian colleges.沙特阿拉伯各学院健康专业与非健康专业学生的蓬勃发展水平。
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Oct 25;15:1469845. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1469845. eCollection 2024.
6
Association Between Diet and Mental Health Outcomes in a Sample of 13,887 Adolescents in Canada.加拿大 13887 名青少年饮食与心理健康结果的关联研究。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2024 Oct 24;21:E82. doi: 10.5888/pcd21.240187.
7
Measurement of flourishing: a scoping review.蓬勃发展的衡量:一项范围综述
Front Psychol. 2024 Feb 1;15:1293943. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1293943. eCollection 2024.
8
I CAN Intervention to Increase Grit and Self-Efficacy: A Pilot Study.“我能”干预以增强毅力和自我效能:一项初步研究。
Brain Sci. 2023 Dec 29;14(1):33. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14010033.
9
Preliminary Effectiveness of a Brief School-Based HERO Intervention: Improving the Wellbeing of Final Year Adolescent Female Students.一项简短的校内HERO干预措施的初步效果:改善青春期毕业班女生的幸福感。
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2024 Jun;55(3):575-587. doi: 10.1007/s10578-023-01629-3. Epub 2023 Dec 5.
10
The association between adolescents' self-esteem and perceived mental well-being in Sweden in four years of follow-up.青少年自尊与瑞典四年随访期间心理健康感知的关系。
BMC Psychol. 2023 Nov 25;11(1):413. doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01450-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Positive Risk Taking in Adolescence.青少年时期的积极冒险行为。
Child Dev Perspect. 2019 Mar;13(1):48-52. doi: 10.1111/cdep.12310. Epub 2018 Nov 6.
2
Psychometric evaluation of the Russian version of the flourishing scale in a sample of older adults living in Siberia.在西伯利亚生活的老年人样本中,对俄罗斯版繁荣量表进行心理计量学评估。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019 Feb 11;17(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12955-019-1100-6.
3
Measurement Invariance of the WHODAS 2.0 Across Youth With and Without Physical or Mental Conditions.WHODAS 2.0 在有和没有身体或精神状况的青年中的测量不变性。
Assessment. 2020 Oct;27(7):1490-1501. doi: 10.1177/1073191118816435. Epub 2018 Dec 3.
4
Adolescents' Psychological Well-Being: A Multidimensional Measure.青少年心理健康:多维测量。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Oct 22;15(10):2325. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15102325.
5
Interrelationships among depression, anxiety, flourishing, and cannabis use in youth.青少年群体中抑郁、焦虑、幸福和大麻使用之间的相互关系。
Addict Behav. 2019 Feb;89:206-215. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.10.007. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
6
Factor Structure of Urdu Version of the Flourishing Scale.《蓬勃发展量表》乌尔都语版本的因子结构
Front Psychol. 2018 Sep 19;9:1513. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01513. eCollection 2018.
7
Development and predictors of mental ill-health and wellbeing from childhood to adolescence.从儿童期到青春期心理健康和幸福感的发展和预测因素。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2018 Dec;53(12):1311-1323. doi: 10.1007/s00127-018-1604-0. Epub 2018 Sep 26.
8
Racial/ethnic discrimination and well-being during adolescence: A meta-analytic review.种族/民族歧视与青少年时期的幸福感:一项元分析综述。
Am Psychol. 2018 Oct;73(7):855-883. doi: 10.1037/amp0000204. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
9
Gender differences in the associations between age trends of social media interaction and well-being among 10-15 year olds in the UK.英国 10-15 岁儿童社交媒体互动与幸福感的年龄趋势关联中存在的性别差异。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Mar 20;18(1):321. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5220-4.
10
Psychometric Properties of the Flourishing Scale and Measurement Invariance Between Two Samples of Spanish University Students.蓬勃发展量表的心理测量特性及西班牙大学生两个样本间的测量不变性
Eval Health Prof. 2017 Dec;40(4):409-424. doi: 10.1177/0163278717703446. Epub 2017 Apr 19.