• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

澳大利亚建成环境特征与残疾流行率的区域水平关联:生态分析。

Area-Level Associations between Built Environment Characteristics and Disability Prevalence in Australia: An Ecological Analysis.

机构信息

Centre of Research Excellence in Disability and Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia.

Centre for Disability Research and Policy, University of Sydney, Lidcombe, NSW 2141, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 26;17(21):7844. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17217844.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph17217844
PMID:33114716
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7662552/
Abstract

The importance of health-promoting neighborhoods has long been recognized, and characteristics of local built environments are among the social determinants of health. People with disability are more likely than other population groups to experience geographic mobility and cost restrictions, and to be reliant on 'opportunity structures' available locally. We conducted an ecological analysis to explore associations between area-level disability prevalence for people aged 15-64 years and area-level built environment characteristics in Australia's 21 largest cities. Overall, disability was more prevalent in areas with lower walkability and lower local availability of various neighborhood amenities such as public transport, healthier food options, public open space, physical activity and recreation destinations and health and mental health services. These patterns of lower liveability in areas of higher disability prevalence were observed in major cities but not in regional cities. Our findings suggest that geographically targeted interventions to improve access to health-enhancing neighborhood infrastructure could reduce disability-related inequalities in the social determinants of health.

摘要

促进健康邻里关系的重要性早已得到认可,而当地建成环境的特点是健康的社会决定因素之一。残疾人群比其他人群更有可能经历地理流动性和成本限制,并依赖当地提供的“机会结构”。我们进行了一项生态分析,以探讨澳大利亚 21 个最大城市中 15-64 岁人群的区域残疾流行率与区域建成环境特征之间的关联。总的来说,在步行性较差和各种邻里设施(如公共交通、更健康的食品选择、公共开放空间、体育活动和娱乐目的地以及健康和心理健康服务)本地供应较低的地区,残疾更为普遍。在主要城市中观察到这些更高残疾流行率地区的生活质量较低的模式,但在区域城市中则没有。我们的研究结果表明,针对特定地理区域的改善促进健康的邻里基础设施的干预措施可能会减少与残疾相关的健康社会决定因素的不平等。

相似文献

1
Area-Level Associations between Built Environment Characteristics and Disability Prevalence in Australia: An Ecological Analysis.澳大利亚建成环境特征与残疾流行率的区域水平关联:生态分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 26;17(21):7844. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17217844.
2
The associations between objectively-determined and self-reported urban form characteristics and neighborhood-based walking in adults.客观确定的和自我报告的城市形态特征与成年人基于社区的步行之间的关联。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014 Jun 4;11:71. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-11-71.
3
Investigating associations between physical activity-related neighborhood built environment features and child weight status to inform local practice.调查与体力活动相关的邻里建成环境特征与儿童体重状况之间的关联,以为当地实践提供信息。
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Feb;270:113694. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113694. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
4
Liveability aspirations and realities: Implementation of urban policies designed to create healthy cities in Australia.宜居性的愿望和现实:澳大利亚实施旨在创建健康城市的城市政策。
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Jan;245:112713. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112713. Epub 2019 Dec 6.
5
Social and Economic Differences in Neighborhood Walkability Across 500 U.S. Cities.500 个美国城市邻里可达性的社会经济差异
Am J Prev Med. 2021 Sep;61(3):394-401. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.03.014. Epub 2021 Jun 6.
6
Associations Between Built Environment Characteristics and Walking in Older Adults in a High-Density City: A Study From a Chinese Megacity.高密度城市中老年人群体力活动与建成环境特征的相关性研究:来自中国特大城市的一项研究。
Front Public Health. 2020 Nov 5;8:577140. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.577140. eCollection 2020.
7
Association of Neighborhood Walkability With Change in Overweight, Obesity, and Diabetes.社区可步行性与超重、肥胖和糖尿病变化的关联。
JAMA. 2016;315(20):2211-20. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.5898.
8
Identifying built environmental patterns using cluster analysis and GIS: relationships with walking, cycling and body mass index in French adults.利用聚类分析和 GIS 识别建成环境模式:与法国成年人的步行、骑行和身体质量指数的关系。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012 May 23;9:59. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-9-59.
9
Neighborhood walkability and the walking behavior of Australian adults.澳大利亚成年人的邻里环境适宜步行程度与步行行为
Am J Prev Med. 2007 Nov;33(5):387-95. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.07.025.
10
Exploring the spatial scale effects of built environments on transport walking: Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.探究建成环境对交通步行的空间尺度效应:动脉粥样硬化的多种族研究。
Health Place. 2022 Jan;73:102722. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2021.102722. Epub 2021 Dec 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Examining the Relationship Between Community Resources and Early Disability Identification: Variation by Child Race or Ethnicity.探究社区资源与早期残疾识别之间的关系:因儿童种族或族裔而异
Prev Sci. 2025 Aug 16. doi: 10.1007/s11121-025-01829-4.
2
Do Area-Level Environmental Factors Influence Employment for People with Disability? A Scoping Review.区域环境因素会影响残疾人就业吗?一项范围综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 26;19(15):9082. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159082.
3
Environmental barriers matter from the early stages of functional decline among older adults in France.

本文引用的文献

1
The Disability and Wellbeing Monitoring Framework: data, data gaps, and policy implications.残疾与健康监测框架:数据、数据缺口及政策影响。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2020 Jun;44(3):227-232. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.12983. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
2
The Urban Liveability Index: developing a policy-relevant urban liveability composite measure and evaluating associations with transport mode choice.城市宜居指数:开发一个与政策相关的城市宜居综合指标,并评估其与交通方式选择的关系。
Int J Health Geogr. 2019 Jun 11;18(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12942-019-0178-8.
3
Prevalence of disability among the major cities in Australia 2012 with geographical representation of distribution in Western Australia.
在法国,老年人从功能衰退的早期开始就受到环境障碍的影响。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 22;17(6):e0270258. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270258. eCollection 2022.
澳大利亚主要城市残疾患病率 2012 年,西澳大利亚州分布的地理代表性。
Health Promot J Austr. 2020 Jan;31(1):121-127. doi: 10.1002/hpja.265. Epub 2019 Jun 22.
4
Liveable for whom? Prospects of urban liveability to address health inequities.宜居为了谁?解决健康不平等问题的城市宜居性前景。
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Jul;232:94-105. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.05.001. Epub 2019 May 2.
5
The potential for walkability to narrow neighbourhood socioeconomic inequalities in physical function: A case study of middle-aged to older adults in Brisbane, Australia.步行性缩小邻里社会经济不平等对身体功能影响的潜力:以澳大利亚布里斯班的中年至老年人为例。
Health Place. 2019 Mar;56:99-105. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.01.020. Epub 2019 Feb 1.
6
Associations of neighborhood socioeconomic, natural and built environmental characteristics with a 13-year trajectory of non-work physical activity among civil servants in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: The Pro-Saude Study.巴西里约热内卢公务员 13 年非工作体力活动轨迹与邻里社会经济、自然和建成环境特征的关联:Pro-Saude 研究。
Health Place. 2018 Sep;53:110-116. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2018.07.014. Epub 2018 Aug 8.
7
Disability concentration and access to rehabilitation services: a pilot spatial assessment applying geographic information system analysis.残疾集中和康复服务获取:应用地理信息系统分析的试点空间评估。
Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Oct;41(20):2468-2476. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1468931. Epub 2018 May 4.
8
Poverty and disability in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review.低收入和中等收入国家的贫困与残疾:一项系统综述。
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 21;12(12):e0189996. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189996. eCollection 2017.
9
Accessibility of fast food outlets is associated with fast food intake. A study in the Capital Region of Denmark.快餐店的可达性与快餐摄入有关。丹麦首都地区的一项研究。
Health Place. 2017 Nov;48:102-110. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2017.10.003. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
10
Inequalities in socio-economic characteristics and health and wellbeing of men with and without disabilities: a cross-sectional analysis of the baseline wave of the Australian Longitudinal Study on Male Health.残疾男性与非残疾男性在社会经济特征、健康及幸福方面的不平等:对澳大利亚男性健康纵向研究基线波次的横断面分析
BMC Public Health. 2016 Oct 31;16(Suppl 3):1042. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3700-y.