• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

区域环境因素会影响残疾人就业吗?一项范围综述。

Do Area-Level Environmental Factors Influence Employment for People with Disability? A Scoping Review.

机构信息

Centre for Disability Research and Policy, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia.

NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Disability and Health, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 26;19(15):9082. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159082.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph19159082
PMID:35897452
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9330484/
Abstract

Employment is an important social determinant of health and wellbeing. People with disability experience labour market disadvantage and have low labour force participation rates, high unemployment rates, and poor work conditions. Environmental factors are crucial as facilitators of or barriers to participation for people with disability. Understanding how the physical, social, and economic characteristics of local areas influence employment for people with disability can potentially inform interventions to reduce employment inequalities. We conducted a scoping review of research investigating associations between area-level environmental factors and employment for people with disability. Eighteen articles published between 2000 and 2020 met the inclusion criteria, and data were extracted to map the current evidence. Area-level factors were categorised into six domains relating to different aspects of environmental context: socioeconomic environment, services, physical environment, social environment, governance, and urbanicity. The urbanicity and socioeconomic environment domains were the most frequently represented (15 and 8 studies, respectively). The studies were heterogeneous in terms of methods and data sources, scale and type of geographic units used for analysis, disability study population, and examined employment outcomes. We conclude that the current evidence base is insufficient to inform the design of interventions. Priorities for future research are identified, which include further theorising the mechanisms by which area-level factors may influence employment outcomes, quantifying the contribution of specific factors, and interrogating specific factors underlying the association between urbanicity and employment outcomes for people with disability.

摘要

就业是健康和幸福的一个重要社会决定因素。残疾人在劳动力市场上面临劣势,劳动力参与率低、失业率高、工作条件差。环境因素是残疾人参与的促进因素或障碍,这一点至关重要。了解当地环境的物理、社会和经济特征如何影响残疾人的就业情况,可能有助于为减少就业不平等提供干预措施。我们对研究环境因素与残疾人就业之间关系的研究进行了范围界定审查。符合纳入标准的文章有 18 篇,发表于 2000 年至 2020 年之间,我们提取了数据以绘制当前的证据图。环境因素分为六个与环境背景的不同方面相关的领域:社会经济环境、服务、物理环境、社会环境、治理和城市化。城市化和社会经济环境领域的研究最多(分别为 15 项和 8 项研究)。这些研究在方法和数据源、用于分析的地理单位的规模和类型、残疾研究人群以及所研究的就业结果等方面存在差异。我们得出结论,当前的证据基础不足以为干预措施的设计提供信息。确定了未来研究的重点,包括进一步理论化环境因素可能影响就业结果的机制,量化特定因素的贡献,以及探讨城市化与残疾人就业结果之间关联背后的具体因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9030/9330484/75354e35c583/ijerph-19-09082-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9030/9330484/75354e35c583/ijerph-19-09082-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9030/9330484/75354e35c583/ijerph-19-09082-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Do Area-Level Environmental Factors Influence Employment for People with Disability? A Scoping Review.区域环境因素会影响残疾人就业吗?一项范围综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 26;19(15):9082. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159082.
2
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
3
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.暑期项目对处境不利或“有风险”的年轻人的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun.
4
Employment for persons with intellectual disability in the Nordic countries: A scoping review.智力残疾人士在北欧国家的就业状况:范围综述。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2021 Jul;34(4):993-1007. doi: 10.1111/jar.12880. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
5
Reducing unemployment benefit duration to increase job finding rates: a systematic review.缩短失业救济期限以提高就业找到率:一项系统综述
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 28;14(1):1-194. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.2. eCollection 2018.
6
Barriers to and facilitators of employment of persons with disabilities in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review.低收入和中等收入国家残疾人就业的障碍与促进因素:一项范围综述
Afr J Disabil. 2021 Jun 22;10:833. doi: 10.4102/ajod.v10i0.833. eCollection 2021.
7
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
8
The effect of the environment on participation of children and youth with disabilities: a scoping review.环境对残疾儿童和青少年参与的影响:范围综述。
Disabil Rehabil. 2013 Sep;35(19):1589-98. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2012.748840. Epub 2013 Jan 25.
9
Effectiveness of interventions for improving educational outcomes for people with disabilities in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review.中低收入国家改善残疾人教育成果干预措施的有效性:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2025 Feb 6;21(1):e70016. doi: 10.1002/cl2.70016. eCollection 2025 Mar.
10
Employment outcomes and experiences of people with seeing disability in Canada: An analysis of the Canadian Survey on Disability 2017.加拿大视力障碍者的就业成果和经历:对 2017 年加拿大残疾调查的分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 29;16(11):e0260160. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260160. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Employment Barriers Experienced at Different Job Acquisition Stages by People With and Without Disabilities.残疾人和非残疾人在不同求职阶段所经历的就业障碍。
J Vocat Rehabil. 2024;61(2):235-252. doi: 10.3233/jvr-240034.

本文引用的文献

1
Examining the effectiveness of place-based interventions to improve public health and reduce health inequalities: an umbrella review.基于场所的干预措施对改善公共卫生和减少健康不平等的效果评估:伞式综述。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Oct 19;21(1):1888. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11852-z.
2
Area-Level Associations between Built Environment Characteristics and Disability Prevalence in Australia: An Ecological Analysis.澳大利亚建成环境特征与残疾流行率的区域水平关联:生态分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 26;17(21):7844. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17217844.
3
Disability, wages, and commuting in New York.
纽约的残疾、工资与通勤
J Transp Geogr. 2020 Jul;87:102818. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102818. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
4
Outcomes and treatment responses, including work productivity, among people with axial spondyloarthritis living in urban and rural areas: a mixed-methods study within a national register.城乡居住的中轴型脊柱关节炎患者的结局和治疗反应,包括工作生产力:全国注册登记研究中的混合方法研究。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2020 Aug;79(8):1055-1062. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-216988. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
5
Environmental Factors that Impact the Workplace Participation of Transition-Aged Young Adults with Brain-Based Disabilities: A Scoping Review.环境因素对脑性残疾青年向成年期过渡期间参与工作的影响:范围综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 31;17(7):2378. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17072378.
6
The impact of life course exposures to neighbourhood deprivation on health and well-being: a review of the long-term neighbourhood effects literature.生命历程中社区贫困暴露对健康和福祉的影响:对长期社区效应文献的综述。
Eur J Public Health. 2020 Oct 1;30(5):922-928. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckz153.
7
Liveable for whom? Prospects of urban liveability to address health inequities.宜居为了谁?解决健康不平等问题的城市宜居性前景。
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Jul;232:94-105. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.05.001. Epub 2019 May 2.
8
Participation of children with disabilities in school: A realist systematic review of psychosocial and environmental factors.残疾儿童的学校参与:心理社会和环境因素的真实系统评价。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 29;14(1):e0210511. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210511. eCollection 2019.
9
Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach.系统评价或范围综述?在选择系统评价或范围综述方法时,作者的指南。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 19;18(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x.
10
The association between non-standard employment, job insecurity and health among British adults with and without intellectual impairments: Cohort study.有和没有智力障碍的英国成年人中非标准就业、工作不安全感与健康之间的关联:队列研究。
SSM Popul Health. 2018 Feb 6;4:197-205. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2018.02.003. eCollection 2018 Apr.