Suppr超能文献

国家早期预警评分 2 版(NEWS2)和 3 级分诊量表在急诊科虚弱老年人中的风险预测作用。

National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) and 3-level triage scale as risk predictors in frail older adults in the emergency department.

机构信息

Emergency Medicine, Helsinki University, Helsinki, Finland.

Department of Emergency Medicine and Services, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

BMC Emerg Med. 2020 Oct 28;20(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12873-020-00379-y.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of the emergency department (ED) triage is to recognize critically ill patients and to allocate resources. No strong evidence for accuracy of the current triage instruments, especially for the older adults, exists. We evaluated the National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) and a 3-level triage assessment as risk predictors for frail older adults visiting the ED.

METHODS

This prospective, observational study was performed in a Finnish ED. The data were collected in a six-month period and included were ≥ 75-year-old residents with Clinical Frailty Scale score of at least four. We analyzed the predictive values of NEWS2 and the three-level triage scale for 30-day mortality, hospital admission, high dependency unit (HDU) and intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, a count of 72-h and 30-day revisits, and ED length-of-stay (LOS).

RESULTS

A total of 1711 ED visits were included. Median for age, CFS, LOS and NEWS2 were 85 years, 6 points, 6.2 h and 1 point, respectively. 30-day mortality was 96/1711. At triage, 69, 356 and 1278 of patients were assessed as red, yellow and green, respectively. There were 1103 admissions, of them 31 to an HDU facility, none to ICU. With NEWS2 and triage score, AUCs for 30-day mortality prediction were 0.70 (0.64-0.76) and 0.62 (0.56-0.68); for hospital admission prediction 0.62 (0.60-0.65) and 0.55 (0.52-0.56), and for HDU admission 0.72 (0.61-0.83) and 0.80 (0.70-0.90), respectively. The NEWS2 divided into risk groups of low, medium and high did not predict the ED LOS (p = 0.095). There was a difference in ED LOS between the red/yellow and as red/green patient groups (p < 0.001) but not between the yellow/green groups (p = 0.59). There were 48 and 351 revisits within 72 h and 30 days, respectively. With NEWS2 AUCs for 72-h and 30-day revisit prediction were 0.48 (95% CI 0.40-0.56) and 0.47 (0.44-0.51), respectively; with triage score 0.48 (0.40-0.56) and 0.49 (0.46-0.52), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The NEWS2 and a local 3-level triage scale are statistically significant, but poor in accuracy, in predicting 30-day mortality, and HDU admission but not ED LOS or revisit rates for frail older adults. NEWS2 also seems to predict hospital admission.

摘要

背景

急诊科分诊的目的是识别危重病患者并分配资源。目前还没有强有力的证据证明当前分诊工具的准确性,特别是对于老年人。我们评估了国家早期预警评分 2 (NEWS2)和 3 级分诊评估作为脆弱老年人就诊急诊科的风险预测指标。

方法

这是一项在芬兰急诊科进行的前瞻性观察性研究。数据收集在六个月的时间内进行,包括临床虚弱量表评分至少为 4 分的≥75 岁居民。我们分析了 NEWS2 和三级分诊量表对 30 天死亡率、住院、高依赖单位(HDU)和重症监护病房(ICU)入院、72 小时和 30 天复诊次数以及急诊科住院时间(LOS)的预测值。

结果

共纳入 1711 例急诊科就诊。年龄、CFS、LOS 和 NEWS2 的中位数分别为 85 岁、6 分、6.2 小时和 1 分。30 天死亡率为 1711 例中的 96 例。分诊时,分别有 69、356 和 1278 例患者被评估为红色、黄色和绿色。共 1103 例患者入院,其中 31 例入住 HDU,无 ICU 入院。使用 NEWS2 和分诊评分,30 天死亡率预测的 AUC 分别为 0.70(0.64-0.76)和 0.62(0.56-0.68);住院预测的 AUC 分别为 0.62(0.60-0.65)和 0.55(0.52-0.56),HDU 入院预测的 AUC 分别为 0.72(0.61-0.83)和 0.80(0.70-0.90)。NEWS2 分为低、中、高风险组,不能预测急诊科 LOS(p=0.095)。红色/黄色和红色/绿色患者组之间的 ED LOS 存在差异(p<0.001),但黄色/绿色患者组之间没有差异(p=0.59)。72 小时内和 30 天内分别有 48 例和 351 例复诊。使用 NEWS2,72 小时和 30 天复诊预测的 AUC 分别为 0.48(95%CI 0.40-0.56)和 0.47(0.44-0.51);使用分诊评分,72 小时和 30 天复诊预测的 AUC 分别为 0.48(0.40-0.56)和 0.49(0.46-0.52)。

结论

NEWS2 和当地的 3 级分诊量表在预测脆弱老年人 30 天死亡率和 HDU 入院方面具有统计学意义,但准确性较差,但不能预测急诊科 LOS 或复诊率。NEWS2 似乎也可以预测住院。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89e9/7594283/63455944fdb3/12873_2020_379_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验