Department of Pediatrics, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, United States.
Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Colombus, OH 43205, United States.
World J Gastroenterol. 2020 Oct 28;26(40):6260-6269. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i40.6260.
Bowel preparation in children can be challenging.
To describe the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of sodium picosulfate, magnesium oxide, and citric acid (SPMC) bowel preparation in children.
Phase 3, randomized, assessor-blinded, multicenter study of low-volume, divided dose SPMC enrolled children 9-16 years undergoing elective colonoscopy. Participants 9-12 years were randomized 1:1:1 to SPMC ½ dose × 2, SPMC 1 dose × 2, or polyethylene glycol (PEG). Participants 13-16 years were randomized 1:1 to SPMC 1 dose × 2 or PEG. PEG-based bowel preparations were administered per local protocol. Primary efficacy endpoint for quality of bowel preparation was responders (rating of 'excellent' or 'good') by modified Aronchick Scale. Secondary efficacy endpoint was participant's tolerability and satisfaction from a 7-item questionnaire. Safety assessments included adverse events (AEs) and laboratory evaluations.
78 participants were randomized, 48 were 9-12 years, 30 were 13-16 years. For the primary efficacy endpoint in 9-12 years, 50.0%, 87.5%, and 81.3% were responders for SPMC ½ dose × 2, SPMC 1 dose × 2, and PEG groups, respectively. Responder rates for 13-16 years were 81.3% for SPMC 1 dose × 2 and 85.7% for PEG. Overall, 43.8% of participants receiving SPMC 1 dose × 2 reported it was 'very easy' or 'easy' to drink, compared with 20.0% receiving PEG. Treatment-emergent AEs were reported by 45.5% of participants receiving SPMC 1 dose × 2 and 63.0% receiving PEG.
SPMC was an efficacious and safe for bowel preparation in children 9-16 years, with comparable efficacy to PEG. Tolerability for SPMC was higher compared to PEG.
儿童的肠道准备可能具有挑战性。
描述匹可硫酸钠、氧化镁和柠檬酸(SPMC)肠道准备在儿童中的疗效、安全性和耐受性。
一项评估低容量、分剂量 SPMC 的 3 期、随机、评估者盲法、多中心研究,纳入 9-16 岁择期行结肠镜检查的儿童。9-12 岁的参与者按 1:1:1 随机分为 SPMC 半剂量×2 组、SPMC 1 剂量×2 组或聚乙二醇(PEG)组。13-16 岁的参与者按 1:1 随机分为 SPMC 1 剂量×2 组或 PEG 组。PEG 肠道准备按当地方案进行。改良 Aronchick 量表评估肠道准备质量的主要疗效终点为应答者(评为“优秀”或“良好”)。次要疗效终点为 7 项问卷评估的参与者耐受性和满意度。安全性评估包括不良事件(AE)和实验室评估。
78 名参与者被随机分组,48 名 9-12 岁,30 名 13-16 岁。9-12 岁的主要疗效终点中,SPMC 半剂量×2 组、SPMC 1 剂量×2 组和 PEG 组的应答率分别为 50.0%、87.5%和 81.3%。13-16 岁的应答率分别为 SPMC 1 剂量×2 组 81.3%和 PEG 组 85.7%。总体而言,接受 SPMC 1 剂量×2 治疗的参与者中有 43.8%报告其“非常容易”或“容易”饮用,而接受 PEG 治疗的参与者中有 20.0%报告。接受 SPMC 1 剂量×2 治疗的参与者中有 45.5%和接受 PEG 治疗的参与者中有 63.0%报告出现治疗相关不良事件。
SPMC 对 9-16 岁儿童的肠道准备是有效且安全的,与 PEG 相比具有相当的疗效。SPMC 的耐受性优于 PEG。