Suppr超能文献

对于上午的结肠镜检查,采用分剂量聚乙二醇电解质散的白色饮食更受青睐,耐受性更好,且不劣于前一天使用聚乙二醇加匹可硫酸钠-枸橼酸镁的清流质饮食:一项随机非劣效性试验。

White Diet with split-dose Picosalax is preferred, better tolerated, and non-inferior to day-before clear fluids with polyethylene glycol plus sodium picosulfate-magnesium citrate for morning colonoscopy: A randomized, non-inferiority trial.

作者信息

Dwyer Jeremy P, Tan Jonathan Y C, Paul Eldho, Bunn Catherine, Mangira Dileep, Secomb Robyn, Gibson Peter R, Brown Gregor

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Alfred Hospital Monash University Melbourne Victoria Australia.

Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine Monash University Melbourne Victoria Australia.

出版信息

JGH Open. 2017 Sep 18;1(1):38-43. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.12006. eCollection 2017 Sep.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Bowel preparations with polyethylene glycol (PEG) and clear fluids are often poorly tolerated. We compared an innovative low-residue White Diet and low-volume, split-dose Picosalax with the standard preparation at our institution of day-before clear fluids and combination PEG plus sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate (SPMC).

METHODS

Adults undergoing morning colonoscopy were randomized to either the White Diet and split-dose, two sachets of Picosalax (WD/PICO) or day-before clear fluids and 1-L PEG plus two sachets of SPMC (CF/PEG + SPMC). The primary endpoint was successful bowel preparation defined by an Ottawa bowel preparation score ≤ 6. An intention-to-treat analysis with a predefined non-inferiority margin of 15% was used to compare efficacy.

RESULTS

A total of 250 patients were randomized (125 WD/PICO and 125 CF/PEG + SPMC). WD/PICO was non-inferior to CF/PEG + SPMC for successful bowel preparation by intention-to-treat analysis (58% WD/PICO 62% CF/PEG + SPMC, 95%CI: -14.2 to 6.2%) and per-protocol analysis (64% WD/PICO 65% CF/PEG + SPMC, 95%CI: -11.3 to 9.4%). Patients in the WD/PICO group reported greater satisfaction with the diet ( < 0.001), greater ease of following the diet ( < 0.001), and improved experience compared with prior colonoscopy ( < 0.0001), less bloating ( = 0.02), less weakness ( = 0.046), less hunger ( < 0.0001), and less interference with daily activities ( = 0.001). Procedure/withdrawal times and adenoma detection rates were similar between groups.

CONCLUSION

Bowel preparation with the White Diet and low-volume, split-dose Picosalax was preferred and better tolerated without detriment to bowel preparation success compared with clear fluids and combination PEG plus SPMC for morning colonoscopy.

摘要

背景与目的

聚乙二醇(PEG)肠道准备联合清流饮食通常耐受性较差。我们将一种创新的低渣白色饮食和小剂量、分剂量的匹可硫酸钠与我院采用的术前一日清流饮食联合PEG加匹可硫酸钠/枸橼酸镁(SPMC)的标准肠道准备方法进行了比较。

方法

接受上午结肠镜检查的成年人被随机分为两组,一组采用白色饮食和分剂量、两包匹可硫酸钠(WD/PICO),另一组采用术前一日清流饮食和1升PEG加两包SPMC(CF/PEG + SPMC)。主要终点是根据渥太华肠道准备评分≤6定义的成功肠道准备。采用意向性分析,预设非劣效性界值为15%,以比较疗效。

结果

共250例患者被随机分组(125例WD/PICO组和125例CF/PEG + SPMC组)。意向性分析显示,WD/PICO在成功肠道准备方面不劣于CF/PEG + SPMC(WD/PICO组为58%,CF/PEG + SPMC组为62%,95%CI:-14.2%至6.2%),符合方案分析结果类似(WD/PICO组为64%,CF/PEG + SPMC组为65%,95%CI:-11.3%至9.4%)。WD/PICO组患者对饮食的满意度更高(P < 0.001),更易于遵循饮食(P < 0.001),与之前的结肠镜检查相比体验有所改善(P < 0.0001),腹胀更少(P = 0.02),虚弱感更少(P = 0.046),饥饿感更少(P < 0.0001),对日常活动的干扰更少(P = 0.001)。两组间操作/退镜时间和腺瘤检出率相似。

结论

对于上午的结肠镜检查,与清流饮食联合PEG加SPMC相比,白色饮食联合小剂量、分剂量的匹可硫酸钠进行肠道准备更受青睐,耐受性更好,且不影响肠道准备的成功率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2695/6207054/5b5132d02c18/JGH3-1-38-g002.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验