• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

跑步者的最佳负重系统:手持水壶、腰带和背包的比较

The Optimal Weight Carriage System for Runners: Comparison Between Handheld Water Bottles, Waist Belts, and Backpacks.

作者信息

Scheer Volker, Vieluf Solveig, Bitter Niko, Christ Leon, Heitkamp Hans-Christian

机构信息

Health Science Department, Universidad a Distancia de Madrid (UDIMA), Madrid, Spain.

Ultra Sports Science Foundation, Pierre Benite, France.

出版信息

Front Physiol. 2020 Sep 30;11:571221. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.571221. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fphys.2020.571221
PMID:33117192
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7561373/
Abstract

In endurance running, where fluid and nutritional support is not always readily available, the carriage of water and nutrition is essential. To compare the economy and physiological demands of different carriage systems, 12 recreational runners (mean age 22.8 ± 2.2 years, body mass index 24.5 ± 1.8 kg m, VOmax 50.4 ± 5.3 ml kg min), completed four running tests, each of 60-min duration at individual running speeds (mean running speed 9.5 ± 1.1 km h) on a motorized treadmill, after an initial exercise test. Either no load was carried (control) or loads of 1.0 kg, in a handheld water bottle, waist belt, or backpack. Economy was assessed by means of energy cost (CR), oxygen cost (O cost), heart rate (HR), and rate of perceived exertion (RPE). CR [(2,20) = 37.74, < 0.01, η = 0.79], O cost [(2,20) = 37.98, < 0.01, η = 0.79], HR [(2,18) = 165.62, < 0.01, η = 0.95], and RPE [(2,18) = 165.62, < 0.01, η = 0.95] increased over time, but no significant differences were found between the systems. Carrying a handheld water bottle, waist belt, or backpack, weighing 1.0 kg, during a 60-min run exhibited similar physiological changes. Runners' choice may be guided by personal preference in the absence of differences in economy (CR, O cost, HR, and RPE).

摘要

在耐力跑中,由于液体和营养支持并非总是随时可得,因此携带水和营养物质至关重要。为了比较不同携带系统的经济性和生理需求,12名休闲跑者(平均年龄22.8±2.2岁,体重指数24.5±1.8 kg/m²,最大摄氧量50.4±5.3 ml·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹)在初始运动测试后,在电动跑步机上以个人跑步速度(平均跑步速度9.5±1.1 km/h)完成了四项60分钟时长的跑步测试。要么不携带任何负荷(对照组),要么分别使用手持水壶、腰带或背包携带1.0 kg的负荷。通过能量消耗(CR)、氧气消耗(O₂消耗)、心率(HR)和主观用力程度(RPE)来评估经济性。CR [F(2,20) = 37.74, p < 0.01, η² = 0.79]、O₂消耗 [F(2,20) = 37.98, p < 0.01, η² = 0.79]、HR [F(2,18) = 165.62, p < 0.01, η² = 0.95] 和RPE [F(2,18) = 165.62, p < 0.01, η² = 0.95] 随时间增加,但各系统之间未发现显著差异。在60分钟的跑步过程中,携带1.0 kg的手持水壶、腰带或背包表现出相似的生理变化。在经济性(CR、O₂消耗、HR和RPE)无差异的情况下,跑者的选择可能受个人偏好的引导。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34f9/7561373/96e7ff48a848/fphys-11-571221-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34f9/7561373/1e14e57bc506/fphys-11-571221-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34f9/7561373/96e7ff48a848/fphys-11-571221-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34f9/7561373/1e14e57bc506/fphys-11-571221-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34f9/7561373/96e7ff48a848/fphys-11-571221-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
The Optimal Weight Carriage System for Runners: Comparison Between Handheld Water Bottles, Waist Belts, and Backpacks.跑步者的最佳负重系统:手持水壶、腰带和背包的比较
Front Physiol. 2020 Sep 30;11:571221. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.571221. eCollection 2020.
2
A comparison of economy between two different backpack designs for runners.两种不同跑步背包设计的经济比较。
Appl Ergon. 2020 Apr;84:103038. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.103038. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
3
Running economy and energy cost of running with backpacks.背负背包跑步时的跑步经济性与能量消耗
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2019 Apr;59(4):555-560. doi: 10.23736/S0022-4707.18.08407-4. Epub 2018 May 2.
4
Running Mechanics and Metabolic Responses With Water Bottles and Bottle Belt Holders.带着水瓶和水瓶腰带固定器跑步的力学原理和代谢反应。
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2018 Sep 1;13(8):977-985. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2017-0184. Epub 2018 Sep 10.
5
Physiological and Biomechanical Responses of Highly Trained Distance Runners to Lower-Body Positive Pressure Treadmill Running.高水平耐力跑运动员对下肢正压跑步机跑步的生理和生物力学反应
Sports Med Open. 2017 Nov 21;3(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s40798-017-0108-x.
6
Changes in Running Economy During a 65-km Ultramarathon.65公里超级马拉松期间跑步经济性的变化
Front Physiol. 2018 Dec 13;9:1809. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.01809. eCollection 2018.
7
No Performance or Affective Advantage of Drinking versus Rinsing with Water during a 15-km Running Session in Female Runners.在女性跑步者15公里跑步过程中,饮水与用水漱口相比,在运动表现或情感方面无优势。
Int J Exerc Sci. 2018 Aug 1;11(2):910-920. doi: 10.70252/ZUUG4953. eCollection 2018.
8
Is There an Optimal Speed for Economical Running?经济跑步是否存在最佳速度?
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2018 Jan 1;13(1):75-81. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2017-0015. Epub 2018 Jan 23.
9
Effect of prolonged exercise at 65 and 80% of VO2max on running economy.以最大摄氧量(VO2max)的65%和80%进行长时间运动对跑步经济性的影响。
Int J Sports Med. 1995 Jul;16(5):309-13. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-973011.
10
Load carriage using packs: a review of physiological, biomechanical and medical aspects.使用背包负重行军:生理、生物力学及医学方面综述
Appl Ergon. 1996 Jun;27(3):207-16. doi: 10.1016/0003-6870(96)00013-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Acute Effects on Impact Accelerations Running with Objects in the Hand.手持物体跑步时对冲击加速度的急性影响。
Life (Basel). 2021 Jun 11;11(6):550. doi: 10.3390/life11060550.

本文引用的文献

1
Defining Off-road Running: A Position Statement from the Ultra Sports Science Foundation.定义越野跑:超运动科学基金会的立场声明。
Int J Sports Med. 2020 May;41(5):275-284. doi: 10.1055/a-1096-0980. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
2
A comparison of economy between two different backpack designs for runners.两种不同跑步背包设计的经济比较。
Appl Ergon. 2020 Apr;84:103038. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.103038. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
3
Predicting Competition Performance in Short Trail Running Races with Lactate Thresholds.利用乳酸阈值预测短距离径赛的比赛成绩
J Hum Kinet. 2019 Oct 18;69:159-167. doi: 10.2478/hukin-2019-0092. eCollection 2019 Oct.
4
The "New York City Marathon": participation and performance trends of 1.2M runners during half-century.《纽约市马拉松》:半世纪以来 120 万名跑者的参与和表现趋势。
Res Sports Med. 2020 Jan-Mar;28(1):121-137. doi: 10.1080/15438627.2019.1586705. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
5
Changes in Running Economy During a 65-km Ultramarathon.65公里超级马拉松期间跑步经济性的变化
Front Physiol. 2018 Dec 13;9:1809. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.01809. eCollection 2018.
6
Participation Trends of Ultra Endurance Events.超长耐力赛事的参与趋势。
Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2019 Mar;27(1):3-7. doi: 10.1097/JSA.0000000000000198.
7
Nutrition in Ultra-Endurance: State of the Art.超耐力运动中的营养:最新进展。
Nutrients. 2018 Dec 16;10(12):1995. doi: 10.3390/nu10121995.
8
Physiology and Pathophysiology in Ultra-Marathon Running.超级马拉松运动中的生理学与病理生理学
Front Physiol. 2018 Jun 1;9:634. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00634. eCollection 2018.
9
A comparison of economy and sagittal plane trunk movements among back-, back/front- and head-loading.背部负重、背部/前部负重和头部负重之间的经济性与矢状面躯干运动比较。
Ergonomics. 2018 Sep;61(9):1216-1222. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2018.1474267. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
10
Running economy and energy cost of running with backpacks.背负背包跑步时的跑步经济性与能量消耗
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2019 Apr;59(4):555-560. doi: 10.23736/S0022-4707.18.08407-4. Epub 2018 May 2.