• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

东欧三国初级医疗保健的转型:学生对其质量的满意度

Primary Healthcare Under Transformation in 3 Eastern European Countries: Quality Satisfaction as Rated by Students.

作者信息

Ahiyevets Sviatlana, Shpakou Andrei, Baj-Korpak Joanna, Kleszczewska Ewa, Rzatkiewicz Katarzyna, Mancewicz Krzysztof, Stetsenko Valentina, Stetsenko Semen

机构信息

Institute of Legal Research, National Centre of Legislation and Legal Research of the Republic of Belarus, Minsk, Belarus.

Yanka Kupala State University of Grodno, Grodno, Belarus.

出版信息

Osong Public Health Res Perspect. 2020 Oct;11(5):286-295. doi: 10.24171/j.phrp.2020.11.5.04.

DOI:10.24171/j.phrp.2020.11.5.04
PMID:33117633
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7577384/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to determine the reasons for student dissatisfaction with the quality of primary healthcare (PHC) in countries under healthcare system transformation (Belarus, Poland, and Ukraine) to identify reserves and make improvements.

METHODS

A comparative multipopulation survey was translated, verified, and completed during face-to-face interviews during March 2019 to May 2019. There were 700 Humanities students included in this study to determine satisfaction with the quality of PHC provided by the family doctor. Satisfaction was assessed according to the availability of the doctor, the level of organization of the institution, the service process, the quality of the interaction with the doctor, adherence to the rights of patients, and any additional financial expense incurred by the patient.

RESULTS

Politeness and attentiveness of doctors were rated highly. Dissatisfaction was associated with the negative attitude of medical personnel towards the patient. One in 10 respondents replied that medical confidentiality was not observed. More than 65% of students had paid for diagnostic tests/or treatments, and some respondents from Poland and Ukraine were asked by the doctor to pay for services without a receipt.

CONCLUSION

Dissatisfaction with the quality of PHC in countries under transformation of the health system was largely due to ethical aspects of the doctor-patient relationship. Therefore, ethical standards need to be upheld and patients need to be aware of these standards using medical education materials covering the moral aspects of the relationship between medical personnel and patient.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定医疗体系转型国家(白俄罗斯、波兰和乌克兰)的学生对初级医疗保健(PHC)质量不满的原因,以找出改进的空间并加以改善。

方法

2019年3月至2019年5月期间,在面对面访谈中对一项比较多人群调查进行了翻译、核实并完成。本研究纳入了700名人文学科学生,以确定他们对家庭医生提供的初级医疗保健质量的满意度。根据医生的可及性、机构的组织水平、服务流程、与医生互动的质量、对患者权利的遵守情况以及患者产生的任何额外财务费用来评估满意度。

结果

医生的礼貌和专注度得到了高度评价。不满与医务人员对患者的消极态度有关。十分之一的受访者表示医疗保密未得到遵守。超过65%的学生支付了诊断测试/治疗费用,波兰和乌克兰的一些受访者被医生要求付费但未收到收据。

结论

医疗体系转型国家对初级医疗保健质量的不满很大程度上归因于医患关系的伦理方面。因此,需要坚持道德标准,并通过涵盖医务人员与患者关系道德方面的医学教育材料让患者了解这些标准。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4526/7577384/c72418a69a96/ophrp-11-286f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4526/7577384/32b40d6b97a9/ophrp-11-286f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4526/7577384/4c070aff638b/ophrp-11-286f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4526/7577384/c72418a69a96/ophrp-11-286f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4526/7577384/32b40d6b97a9/ophrp-11-286f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4526/7577384/4c070aff638b/ophrp-11-286f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4526/7577384/c72418a69a96/ophrp-11-286f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Primary Healthcare Under Transformation in 3 Eastern European Countries: Quality Satisfaction as Rated by Students.东欧三国初级医疗保健的转型:学生对其质量的满意度
Osong Public Health Res Perspect. 2020 Oct;11(5):286-295. doi: 10.24171/j.phrp.2020.11.5.04.
2
Overall satisfaction of health care users with the quality of and access to health care services: a cross-sectional study in six Central and Eastern European countries.医疗保健用户对医疗保健服务质量和可及性的总体满意度:中东欧六个国家的横断面研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Aug 2;16(a):342. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1585-1.
3
Experiences of a student-run clinic in primary care: a mixed-method study with students, patients and supervisors.学生运营的基层医疗诊所的经验:一项针对学生、患者和督导员的混合方法研究。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2018 Mar;36(1):36-46. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2018.1426143. Epub 2018 Jan 25.
4
STATE OBLIGATIONS IN PROVISION OF THE PRIMARY PHYSICIAN'S RIGHT TO MEDICAL PRACTICE AS ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN LIGHT OF TRANSFORMATION OF THE HEALTH CARE SYSTEM IN UKRAINE.鉴于乌克兰医疗体系的变革,国家在保障初级医师作为企业家从事医疗执业权利方面的义务
Georgian Med News. 2020 Jun(303):194-199.
5
Determinants of primary healthcare patients' dissatisfaction with the quality of provided medical services.初级医疗保健患者对所提供医疗服务质量不满的决定因素。
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2021 Mar 18;28(1):142-148. doi: 10.26444/aaem/132783. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
6
Patient satisfaction with doctor-patient interactions: a mixed methods study among diabetes mellitus patients in Pakistan.患者对医患互动的满意度:巴基斯坦糖尿病患者的一项混合方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Feb 21;17(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2094-6.
7
Patient satisfaction with healthcare provided by family doctors: primary dimensions and an attempt at typology.患者对家庭医生提供的医疗服务的满意度:主要维度及类型划分尝试。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Apr 16;9:63. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-63.
8
What do beginning students, in a rurally focused medical course, think about rural practice?在以农村为重点的医学课程中,刚开始学习的学生对农村医疗实践有什么看法?
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Dec 7;16(1):310. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0829-4.
9
[Analysis of current conditions concerning development of palliative care in three selected countries of the former Eastern Bloc].[对前东欧集团三个选定国家姑息治疗发展现状的分析]
Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2013 Aug;35(206):89-93.
10
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.

本文引用的文献

1
Poland: Health System Review.波兰:卫生系统评估
Health Syst Transit. 2019 Jun;21(1):1-234.
2
A proactive general practice: Integrating public health into primary care.积极主动的全科医疗:将公共卫生融入初级保健。
London J Prim Care (Abingdon). 2018 Mar 20;10(2):17-18. doi: 10.1080/17571472.2018.1445946. eCollection 2018 Mar.
3
[Identification of health outcome indicators in Primary Care. A review of systematic reviews].[基层医疗中健康结局指标的识别。系统评价的综述]
Rev Calid Asist. 2017 Sep-Oct;32(5):278-288. doi: 10.1016/j.cali.2017.08.001. Epub 2017 Oct 9.
4
Quality of medical service, patient satisfaction and loyalty with a focus on interpersonal-based medical service encounters and treatment effectiveness: a cross-sectional multicenter study of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) hospitals.以人际导向的医疗服务接触和治疗效果为重点的医疗服务质量、患者满意度和忠诚度:一项针对补充和替代医学(CAM)医院的横断面多中心研究。
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2017 Mar 28;17(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s12906-017-1691-6.
5
Ukraine: health system review.乌克兰:卫生系统评估。
Health Syst Transit. 2015 Mar;17(2):1-154.
6
Belarus: health system review.白俄罗斯:卫生系统评估
Health Syst Transit. 2013;15(5):1-118.
7
Strengthening weak primary care systems: steps towards stronger primary care in selected Western and Eastern European countries.加强薄弱的初级保健系统:在选定的西欧和东欧国家加强初级保健的步骤。
Health Policy. 2013 Nov;113(1-2):170-9. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.05.024. Epub 2013 Jul 26.
8
The influences of patient's satisfaction with medical service delivery, assessment of medical service, and trust in health delivery system on patient's life satisfaction in China.在中国,患者对医疗服务提供、医疗服务评估和对卫生保健系统信任的满意度对患者生活满意度的影响。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2012 Sep 14;10:111. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-10-111.
9
Health reform in central and eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union.中东欧及前苏联地区的医疗改革。
Lancet. 2009 Oct 3;374(9696):1186-95. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61334-9.
10
What do patients value in their hospital care? An empirical perspective on autonomy centred bioethics.患者在医院护理中看重什么?基于自主性的生物伦理学的实证视角。
J Med Ethics. 2003 Apr;29(2):103-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.29.2.103.