Department of Pathology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
ARUP Laboratories, Salt Lake City, UT.
Am J Clin Pathol. 2021 Jan 4;155(1):4-11. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqaa187.
The clinical laboratory community has faced unprecedented challenges in responding to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Long-held assumptions about laboratory management have been reconsidered in light of these new circumstances.
Experience during the first 6 months of the COVID-19 pandemic at a clinical reference laboratory was reviewed in the context of several commonly held management principles to assess their relevance to clinical laboratory operations during a crisis.
Management and operational ideas regarding different modes of communication, physical proximity and interaction, operating under a fixed budget, and maintaining a breadth of laboratory service offerings have been challenged during the COVID-19 pandemic. The importance of putting people first, maintaining collaboration, and providing effective leadership and communication throughout an organization have been highlighted.
The collaborative activities of highly interdependent teams and individuals have helped the clinical laboratory community respond to society's needs in the COVID-19 crisis. Not all laboratory management principles apply equally well in the course of an international respiratory pandemic. When navigating crises, leaders need to distinguish situational management principles from those that are universal.
应对 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行,临床实验室界面临着前所未有的挑战。鉴于这些新情况,人们对实验室管理的长期假设进行了重新考虑。
在 COVID-19 大流行的前 6 个月期间,我们在临床参考实验室中对一些常见的管理原则进行了回顾,以评估它们在危机期间与临床实验室操作的相关性。
在 COVID-19 大流行期间,人们对不同沟通模式、身体接近度和互动、在固定预算下运作以及维持广泛的实验室服务提供方式的管理和运营理念提出了挑战。强调了以人为本、保持协作以及在整个组织中提供有效领导和沟通的重要性。
高度相互依存的团队和个人的协作活动帮助临床实验室界应对 COVID-19 危机中社会的需求。并非所有实验室管理原则在国际呼吸道大流行期间都同样适用。在应对危机时,领导者需要区分情境管理原则和普遍适用的原则。