Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2020 Oct 26;140(15). doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.20.0095. Print 2020 Oct 27.
This article describes a scabies outbreak at a boarding school where failure of the first-line therapy was suspected.
A group of five students, two of whom were room-mates, presented with a varying degree of pruritic papular rash. Repeated treatments with permethrin monitored by the school nurse, in conjunction with a rigorous hygiene regimen, proved to be ineffective. Eventually all five students were prescribed a combination therapy consisting of permethrin and ivermectin. This treatment proved effective in all five students. Despite closely monitored treatment, monotherapy with permethrin failed in all five patients. We discuss whether the lack of response was due to failed application, inability to rid the home environment of mites, reinfection by unidentified infected individuals or increased tolerance to permethrin.
Repeated therapeutic failure when permethrin was used under controlled conditions and documented mechanisms for increased tolerance may indicate the last possibility. We therefore call for additional research on this topic.
本文描述了一起发生在寄宿学校的疥疮疫情,疑似一线治疗失败。
五名学生出现不同程度的瘙痒性丘疹性皮疹,其中两名是室友。尽管学校护士反复监测并使用了扑灭司林,但辅以严格的卫生措施,治疗仍未见效。最终,所有五名学生均被开具了包含扑灭司林和伊维菌素的联合治疗药物。这种治疗方法对所有五名学生都有效。尽管进行了密切监测的治疗,但所有五名患者单独使用扑灭司林的治疗都失败了。我们讨论了缺乏反应是否是由于应用失败、无法彻底清除家庭环境中的螨虫、被未识别的感染者再次感染或对扑灭司林的耐受性增加所致。
在受控条件下使用扑灭司林并记录到增加耐受性的机制后,治疗仍反复失败,这可能表明存在最后一种可能性。因此,我们呼吁对此问题进行进一步研究。