• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

以患者为中心的注册研究中观察数据的系统分析框架:抑郁症患者的案例研究

A Systematic Framework for Analyzing Observation Data in Patient-Centered Registries: Case Study for Patients With Depression.

作者信息

Zolnoori Maryam, Williams Mark D, Leasure William B, Angstman Kurt B, Ngufor Che

机构信息

Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Oct 29;9(10):e18366. doi: 10.2196/18366.

DOI:10.2196/18366
PMID:33118958
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7661226/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient-centered registries are essential in population-based clinical care for patient identification and monitoring of outcomes. Although registry data may be used in real time for patient care, the same data may further be used for secondary analysis to assess disease burden, evaluation of disease management and health care services, and research. The design of a registry has major implications for the ability to effectively use these clinical data in research.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to develop a systematic framework to address the data and methodological issues involved in analyzing data in clinically designed patient-centered registries.

METHODS

The systematic framework was composed of 3 major components: visualizing the multifaceted and heterogeneous patient-centered registries using a data flow diagram, assessing and managing data quality issues, and identifying patient cohorts for addressing specific research questions.

RESULTS

Using a clinical registry designed as a part of a collaborative care program for adults with depression at Mayo Clinic, we were able to demonstrate the impact of the proposed framework on data integrity. By following the data cleaning and refining procedures of the framework, we were able to generate high-quality data that were available for research questions about the coordination and management of depression in a primary care setting. We describe the steps involved in converting clinically collected data into a viable research data set using registry cohorts of depressed adults to assess the impact on high-cost service use.

CONCLUSIONS

The systematic framework discussed in this study sheds light on the existing inconsistency and data quality issues in patient-centered registries. This study provided a step-by-step procedure for addressing these challenges and for generating high-quality data for both quality improvement and research that may enhance care and outcomes for patients.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/18366.

摘要

背景

以患者为中心的登记系统在基于人群的临床护理中对于患者识别和结局监测至关重要。尽管登记系统数据可实时用于患者护理,但这些相同的数据还可进一步用于二次分析,以评估疾病负担、评价疾病管理和医疗服务以及开展研究。登记系统的设计对在研究中有效使用这些临床数据的能力具有重大影响。

目的

本研究旨在开发一个系统框架,以解决在临床设计的以患者为中心的登记系统中分析数据所涉及的数据和方法学问题。

方法

该系统框架由3个主要部分组成:使用数据流程图可视化多方面且异质性的以患者为中心的登记系统、评估和管理数据质量问题以及识别用于解决特定研究问题的患者队列。

结果

通过使用作为梅奥诊所成人抑郁症协作护理计划一部分而设计的临床登记系统,我们能够证明所提出框架对数据完整性的影响。通过遵循该框架的数据清理和完善程序,我们能够生成高质量的数据,这些数据可用于有关初级保健环境中抑郁症协调和管理的研究问题。我们描述了使用抑郁症成年患者登记队列将临床收集的数据转换为可行研究数据集所涉及的步骤,以评估对高成本服务使用的影响。

结论

本研究中讨论的系统框架揭示了以患者为中心的登记系统中现有的不一致性和数据质量问题。本研究提供了一个逐步程序,用于应对这些挑战并生成高质量数据,以用于质量改进和研究,这可能会改善患者的护理和结局。

国际注册报告识别号(IRRID):DERR1-10.2196/18366。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c266/7661226/cc82bf35796c/resprot_v9i10e18366_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c266/7661226/6f4f20fec789/resprot_v9i10e18366_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c266/7661226/e6d8143b6555/resprot_v9i10e18366_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c266/7661226/80385510943f/resprot_v9i10e18366_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c266/7661226/cc82bf35796c/resprot_v9i10e18366_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c266/7661226/6f4f20fec789/resprot_v9i10e18366_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c266/7661226/e6d8143b6555/resprot_v9i10e18366_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c266/7661226/80385510943f/resprot_v9i10e18366_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c266/7661226/cc82bf35796c/resprot_v9i10e18366_fig4.jpg

相似文献

1
A Systematic Framework for Analyzing Observation Data in Patient-Centered Registries: Case Study for Patients With Depression.以患者为中心的注册研究中观察数据的系统分析框架:抑郁症患者的案例研究
JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Oct 29;9(10):e18366. doi: 10.2196/18366.
2
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
3
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.卡塔尔国重症监护网络。
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.
4
A Systematic Framework for Analyzing Patient-Generated Narrative Data: Protocol for a Content Analysis.用于分析患者生成的叙事数据的系统框架:内容分析方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Aug 26;8(8):13914. doi: 10.2196/13914.
5
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
6
The NCI All Ireland Cancer Conference.美国国家癌症研究所全爱尔兰癌症会议。
Oncologist. 1999;4(4):275-277.
7
A Patient-Centered Mobile Phone App (iHeartU) With a Virtual Human Assistant for Self-Management of Heart Failure: Protocol for a Usability Assessment Study.一款以患者为中心、带有虚拟人类助手的心力衰竭自我管理手机应用程序(iHeartU):可用性评估研究方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 May 23;8(5):e13502. doi: 10.2196/13502.
8
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
9
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
10
Combined quality function deployment and logical framework analysis to improve quality of emergency care in Malta.结合质量功能展开与逻辑框架分析以提高马耳他的急诊护理质量。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2016;29(2):123-40. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-04-2014-0040.

本文引用的文献

1
Cohort selection for clinical trials using deep learning models.使用深度学习模型进行临床试验的队列选择。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Nov 1;26(11):1181-1188. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz139.
2
Extending Achilles Heel Data Quality Tool with New Rules Informed by Multi-Site Data Quality Comparison.通过多站点数据质量比较得出的新规则扩展阿喀琉斯之踵数据质量工具
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019 Aug 21;264:1488-1489. doi: 10.3233/SHTI190498.
3
Providing Mental Health Services in the Primary Care Setting: the Experiences and Perceptions of General Practitioners at a New York City Clinic.
在初级保健环境中提供心理健康服务:纽约市一家诊所的全科医生的经验和看法。
Psychiatr Q. 2018 Dec;89(4):897-908. doi: 10.1007/s11126-018-9587-2.
4
Data Quality in Rare Diseases Registries.罕见病登记处的数据质量。
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;1031:149-164. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-67144-4_8.
5
Antidepressant Use Among Persons Aged 12 and Over:United States,2011-2014.12岁及以上人群的抗抑郁药使用情况:美国,2011 - 2014年
NCHS Data Brief. 2017 Aug(283):1-8.
6
Urgent Need for Improved Mental Health Care and a More Collaborative Model of Care.迫切需要改善精神卫生保健及采用更具协作性的护理模式。
Perm J. 2017;21:17-024. doi: 10.7812/TPP/17-024.
7
A Registry Framework Enabling Patient-Centred Care.一个支持以患者为中心的护理的注册框架。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;214:8-14.
8
Screening and case finding for major depressive disorder using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9): a meta-analysis.使用患者健康问卷(PHQ-9)筛查和发现重度抑郁症:一项荟萃分析。
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2015 Nov-Dec;37(6):567-76. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2015.06.012. Epub 2015 Jun 18.
9
Exploring patterns of error in acute care using framework analysis.使用框架分析法探索急性护理中的差错模式。
BMC Med Educ. 2015 Jan 16;15:3. doi: 10.1186/s12909-015-0285-6.
10
Antidepressant Medication Use Among Patients with Depression: Comparison between Usual Care and Collaborative Care Using Care Managers.抑郁症患者使用抗抑郁药物治疗:常规护理与使用护理经理的协作护理的比较。
Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2013 May 31;9:84-7. doi: 10.2174/1745017901309010084. Print 2013.