Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Department of Bioengineering, Swanson School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Oct 27;20(21):6118. doi: 10.3390/s20216118.
Rehabilitation has been shown to improve functional outcomes following total knee replacement (TKR). However, its delivery and associated costs are highly variable. The authors have developed and previously validated the accuracy of a remote (wearable) rehabilitation monitoring platform (). The present study's objective was to assess the feasibility of utilizing for the remote management of rehabilitation after TKR and to determine a preliminary estimate of the effects of the system on the value of rehabilitation. Specifically, we tested post-operative outpatient rehabilitation supplemented with (n = 13) by comparing it to a standard post-operative outpatient rehabilitation program (n = 12) using a randomized design. Attrition rates were relatively low and not significantly different between groups, indicating that participants found both interventions acceptable. A small (not statistically significant) decrease in the number of physical therapy visits was observed in the Group, therefore no significant difference in total cost could be observed. All patients and physical therapists in the Group indicated that they would use the system again in the future. Therefore, the next steps are to address the concerns identified in this pilot study and to expand the platform to include behavioral change strategies prior to conducting a full-scale randomized controlled trial. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02646761 ": A Portable Joint Function Monitoring and Training System for Remote Rehabilitation Following TKA" 6 January 2016.
康复已被证明可改善全膝关节置换术(TKR)后的功能结果。然而,其提供方式和相关成本存在高度差异。作者已经开发并验证了一种远程(可穿戴)康复监测平台()的准确性。本研究的目的是评估利用 进行 TKR 后远程康复管理的可行性,并初步估计 系统对康复价值的影响。具体而言,我们通过随机设计,将术后门诊康复与 (n = 13)进行比较,以此来评估 (n = 12)的标准术后门诊康复计划。两组的脱落率均相对较低且无统计学差异,表明患者认为这两种干预均是可接受的。在 组中观察到物理治疗就诊次数略有减少(无统计学意义),因此无法观察到总费用的显著差异。组内所有患者和物理治疗师均表示他们将来会再次使用该系统。因此,下一步是解决该试点研究中发现的问题,并在进行全面的随机对照试验之前,将该平台扩展到包括行为改变策略。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02646761“一种用于 TKA 后远程康复的便携式关节功能监测和训练系统”2016 年 1 月 6 日。