• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

修正先验假设:系统性种族主义已渗透科学资金。

Revising the a Priori Hypothesis: Systemic Racism Has Penetrated Scientific Funding.

机构信息

Department of Neurobiology, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.

出版信息

Cell. 2020 Oct 29;183(3):576-579. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.09.026.

DOI:10.1016/j.cell.2020.09.026
PMID:33125883
Abstract

To manifest our sincerest aspirations to "enhance health, lengthen life, and reduce illness and disability," the US biomedical research enterprise must directly confront the reality of structural racism in scientific funding and the widespread denial of its existence. I believe that moment in American history has, at long last, arrived.

摘要

为了表达我们“增进健康、延长寿命、减少疾病和残疾”的真诚愿望,美国生物医学研究企业必须直面科学资金分配中结构性种族主义的现实,以及对其广泛存在的否认。我相信,美国历史上的这一时刻终于到来了。

相似文献

1
Revising the a Priori Hypothesis: Systemic Racism Has Penetrated Scientific Funding.修正先验假设:系统性种族主义已渗透科学资金。
Cell. 2020 Oct 29;183(3):576-579. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.09.026.
2
Affirming NIH's commitment to addressing structural racism in the biomedical research enterprise.美国国立卫生研究院承诺致力于解决生物医学研究领域的结构性种族主义问题。
Cell. 2021 Jun 10;184(12):3075-3079. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.05.014.
3
Racial inequity in grant funding from the US National Institutes of Health.美国国立卫生研究院拨款中的种族不平等现象。
Elife. 2021 Jan 18;10:e65697. doi: 10.7554/eLife.65697.
4
The NIH must reduce disparities in funding to maximize its return on investments from taxpayers.美国国立卫生研究院必须减少资金投入方面的差异,以最大限度地提高纳税人投资的回报。
Elife. 2018 Mar 23;7:e34965. doi: 10.7554/eLife.34965.
5
US biomedical research under siege.美国生物医学研究受到围攻。
Cell. 2006 Jan 13;124(1):9-12. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.12.029.
6
Why aren't there more scientists advocating for funding?为什么没有更多科学家倡导提供资金呢?
Science. 2006 Nov 17;314(5802):1081. doi: 10.1126/science.314.5802.1081b.
7
Opinion: The National Institutes of Health needs to better balance funding distributions among US institutions.观点:美国国立卫生研究院需要更好地平衡美国各机构之间的资金分配。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Jul 2;116(27):13150-13154. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1909217116.
8
It is time to update US biomedical funding.是时候更新美国的生物医学资金了。
Nature. 2013 Sep 12;501(7466):137. doi: 10.1038/501137a.
9
Not the Last Word: Prizes for Cures.并非最终定论:治愈之奖
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Aug;477(8):1786-1789. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000869.
10
Changes in Congress cloud prospects for funding.国会的变动给资金筹集前景蒙上了阴影。
Nature. 2010 May 27;465(7297):404-5. doi: 10.1038/465404b.

引用本文的文献

1
Sustaining the Biomedical Research Workforce: Medical School Leadership in Supporting Research Learners.维持生物医学研究人员队伍:医学院在支持研究学员方面的领导力。
Acad Med. 2025 Jun 2. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000006114.
2
Scientific racism as a public health emergency of global concern.科学种族主义是一个全球关注的公共卫生突发事件。
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2025 Mar 4;44:101049. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2025.101049. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3
Sociodemographic reporting and sample composition over 3 decades of psychopathology research: A systematic review and quantitative synthesis.
30 余年来精神病理学研究中的社会人口学报告和样本构成:系统回顾和定量综合。
J Psychopathol Clin Sci. 2024 Jan;133(1):20-36. doi: 10.1037/abn0000871.
4
Factors related to the severity of research misconduct administrative actions: An analysis of office of research integrity case summaries from 1993 to 2023.与科研不端行为行政处分严重程度相关的因素:对1993年至2023年科研诚信办公室案例摘要的分析
Account Res. 2025 Apr;32(3):417-438. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2023.2287046. Epub 2023 Nov 30.
5
Juneteenth in STEMM and the barriers to equitable science.六·一九运动与科学领域的公平障碍
Cell. 2023 Jun 8;186(12):2510-2517. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2023.05.016.
6
Building consensus around the assessment and interpretation of Symbiodiniaceae diversity.围绕 Symbiodiniaceae 多样性的评估和解释达成共识。
PeerJ. 2023 May 2;11:e15023. doi: 10.7717/peerj.15023. eCollection 2023.
7
Systemic racial disparities in funding rates at the National Science Foundation.国立科学基金会资金资助率的系统性种族差异。
Elife. 2022 Nov 29;11:e83071. doi: 10.7554/eLife.83071.
8
"If you got a problem, I got a problem too": working toward making academic science more equitable.“如果你有问题,我也有问题”:努力使学术科学更加公平。
Mol Biol Cell. 2022 Dec 1;33(14):ae6. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E22-09-0420.
9
Ten simple rules for creating a global network in computational biology.构建计算生物学全球网络的十条简明规则。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2022 Oct 27;18(10):e1010528. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010528. eCollection 2022 Oct.
10
Recommendations for empowering early career researchers to improve research culture and practice.促进早期职业研究者赋权以改善研究文化和实践的建议。
PLoS Biol. 2022 Jul 7;20(7):e3001680. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001680. eCollection 2022 Jul.