Liu Daphne H, Raftery Adrian E
Popul Dev Rev. 2020 Sep;46(3):409-441. doi: 10.1111/padr.12347. Epub 2020 Jul 23.
Education and family planning can both be influenced by policy and are thought to accelerate fertility decline. However, questions remain about the nature of these effects. Does the effect of education operate through increasing educational attainment of women or educational enrollment of children? At which educational level is the effect strongest? Does the effect of family planning operate through increasing contraceptive prevalence or reducing unmet need? Is education or family planning more important? We assessed the quantitative impact of education and family planning in high-fertility settings using a regression framework inspired by Granger causality. We found that women's attainment of lower secondary education is key to accelerating fertility decline and found an accelerating effect of contraceptive prevalence for modern methods. We found the impact of contraceptive prevalence to be substantially larger than that of education. These accelerating effects hold in sub-Saharan Africa, but with smaller effect sizes there than elsewhere.
教育和计划生育都可能受到政策影响,并且被认为会加速生育率下降。然而,这些影响的本质仍存在疑问。教育的影响是通过提高女性的教育程度还是儿童的入学率来实现的?在哪个教育水平上这种影响最强?计划生育的影响是通过提高避孕普及率还是减少未满足的需求来实现的?教育还是计划生育更重要?我们使用受格兰杰因果关系启发的回归框架,评估了高生育率地区教育和计划生育的量化影响。我们发现,女性接受初中教育是加速生育率下降的关键,并且现代避孕方法普及率的提高有加速作用。我们发现避孕普及率的影响远大于教育的影响。这些加速作用在撒哈拉以南非洲地区也存在,但那里的效应规模比其他地区小。