de Haas Billie, Kabagenyi Allen, Diennabila Syifasari
Stud Fam Plann. 2025 Jun;56(2):243-273. doi: 10.1111/sifp.70012. Epub 2025 May 5.
Fertility research in sub-Saharan Africa regularly indicates the need to increase women's reproductive autonomy. However, individual, female-focused conceptualizations of reproductive autonomy tend to neglect the power dynamics both internal and external to couples and other intimate relationships that shape a woman's reproductive autonomy. Furthermore, they disregard the reproductive autonomy of men and other subpopulations and partners in intimate relationships. To identify gaps and evaluate the applicability of the concept, this scoping review clarifies how reproductive autonomy has been assessed and applied in fertility research in sub-Saharan Africa. Eligible for inclusion were empirical peer-reviewed publications, including quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods research, published since 1994. Out of 1568 articles screened, 18 met the inclusion criteria. Most publications were quantitative in nature and focused mainly on the reproductive autonomy of women. Our key finding is that the reproductive autonomy of partners in intimate relationships, and of women in particular, is restricted at the community level in order to preserve the status quo of social power structures in society. In line with a reproductive justice approach, more research should focus on the reproductive autonomy of vulnerable and understudied populations as well as on the interpersonal and contextual dynamics that suppress reproductive autonomy in communal settings.
撒哈拉以南非洲地区的生育研究经常表明,有必要增强女性的生殖自主权。然而,以女性个体为中心的生殖自主权概念往往忽视了夫妻及其他亲密关系内部和外部的权力动态,而正是这些权力动态塑造了女性的生殖自主权。此外,它们忽视了男性以及亲密关系中其他亚群体和伴侣的生殖自主权。为了找出差距并评估该概念的适用性,本范围综述阐明了生殖自主权在撒哈拉以南非洲地区生育研究中是如何被评估和应用的。纳入标准为自1994年以来发表的经同行评审的实证性出版物,包括定量研究、定性研究和混合方法研究。在筛选的1568篇文章中,有18篇符合纳入标准。大多数出版物本质上是定量研究,主要关注女性的生殖自主权。我们的主要发现是,为了维护社会中社会权力结构的现状,亲密关系中伴侣的生殖自主权,尤其是女性的生殖自主权,在社区层面受到限制。按照生殖正义的方法,更多的研究应关注弱势群体和研究不足群体的生殖自主权,以及在社区环境中抑制生殖自主权的人际和背景动态。