Paasch C, Fiebelkorn J, De Santo G, Aljedani N, Ortiz P, Gauger U, Boettge K, Full S H, Anders S, Hünerbein M
Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Schwanebecker Chaussee 50, 13125, Berlin, Germany.
Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany.
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020 Sep 22;59:281-285. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.09.017. eCollection 2020 Nov.
The transversus abdominis plane block is a regional anesthesia technique. Recently, its impact on early chronic pain and the cumulative need of analgesic medication following inguinal hernia repair is being monitored. In terms of effectiveness and patient safety, it remains unclear whether the approach should be conducted preoperatively through ultrasound guidance, or through intraoperative visual guidance.The study at hand aims to provide more evidence on this topic.
A monocentric retrospective matched pair analysis was performed. The intraoperative visual guided and ultrasound guided -transversus abdominis plane block prior to inguinal hernia repair in transabdominal preperitoneal technique were consecutively compared in regard to analgesic effectiveness and complication rate. The data of individuals who were operated on from June 2007 to February 2019 were analyzed. The matching criteria were ASA-Score, Gender, Age ( ±6 years), and hernia size (<1,5 cm, 1,5-3 cm, >1,5 cm).
A total of 116 patients were enrolled. Both groups were homogenous in terms of age, gender contribution, body mass index, ASA-Score, hernia type, and size. The pain score at the postoperative anesthesia care unit was lower in the ultrasound-guided-transversus abdominis plane group without being statistically significant (VAS-Score: 0.67 vs.0.84). Patients of the ultrasound-guided-transversus abdominis plane group received significantly less metamizole on the day of operation (1.29 g (0.96) vs. 1.68 g (0.70), p = 0.015).
Due to our findings, we assume that the ultrasound-guided-transversus abdominis plane -Block may reduce postoperative pain and analgesic consumption more effectively than the visual-guided-transversus abdominis plane lock. Further prospective clinical trials are mandatory.
腹横肌平面阻滞是一种区域麻醉技术。最近,正在监测其对腹股沟疝修补术后早期慢性疼痛和镇痛药物累积需求的影响。在有效性和患者安全性方面,该方法是应在术前通过超声引导进行,还是通过术中视觉引导进行,仍不明确。本研究旨在为该主题提供更多证据。
进行了一项单中心回顾性配对分析。对经腹腹膜前技术腹股沟疝修补术前术中视觉引导和超声引导的腹横肌平面阻滞在镇痛效果和并发症发生率方面进行了连续比较。分析了2007年6月至2019年2月接受手术的患者数据。匹配标准为美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分、性别、年龄(±6岁)和疝大小(<1.5 cm、1.5 - 3 cm、>1.5 cm)。
共纳入116例患者。两组在年龄、性别构成比例、体重指数、ASA评分、疝类型和大小方面均具有同质性。超声引导腹横肌平面组术后麻醉恢复室的疼痛评分较低,但无统计学意义(视觉模拟评分法[VAS]评分:0.67对0.84)。超声引导腹横肌平面组患者在手术当天接受的安乃近明显更少(1.29 g[0.96]对1.68 g[0.70],p = 0.015)。
基于我们的研究结果,我们认为超声引导腹横肌平面阻滞可能比视觉引导腹横肌平面阻滞更有效地减轻术后疼痛和减少镇痛药物用量。进一步的前瞻性临床试验是必要的。