Geß Andreas, Viola Irene, Miretti Silvia, Macchi Elisabetta, Perona Giovanni, Battaglini Luca, Baratta Mario
Department of Life Cycle Engineering, Institute for Acoustics and Building Physics, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
Department of Veterinary Science, University of Turin, Grugliasco, Italy.
Front Vet Sci. 2020 Sep 28;7:651. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00651. eCollection 2020.
Lamb meat production provides vital landscape-management and ecosystem services; however, ruminant farming produces a considerable share of the world's greenhouse gas emissions. To measure and compare the advantages and disadvantages of the intensification of livestock farming, an integrative analysis was conducted in this study by combining environmental impact analysis and animal welfare assessment. This approach is the first of its kind and is the innovative aspect of this paper. The methodology of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) entails the holistic analysis of various impact categories and the associated emission quantities of products, services, and resources over their life cycle, including resource extraction and processing, production processes, transport, usage, and the end of life. The outlines of LCA are standardized in DIN EN ISO 14040/14044. To assess the environmental impacts of the production of lamb meat in northern Italy, two case studies were undertaken using the LCA software GaBi. The analysis is based on primary data from two sheep-breeding systems (semi-extensive and semi-intensive in alpine and continental bioregions, respectively) combined with inventory data from the GaBi database and data from the literature. The assessment was conducted for the functional unit of 1 kg of lamb meat and focuses on the impact categories global warming potential, acidification potential, and eutrophication potential. For an overall evaluation of the supply chain, we have also considered a parameter indicating animal welfare, in keeping with consumer concerns, employing an analysis of chronic stress as shown by cortisol accumulation. The goal is to derive models and recommendations for an efficient, more sustainable use of resources without compromising animal welfare, meat quality, and competitiveness. The aim of this study is to provide a standard for individualized sustainability analyses for European lamb production systems in the future. From the LCA perspective, the more intensive case-study farm showed a lower impact in global impact factors and a higher impact in local impact categories in comparison with the more extensively run farm that was studied. From the animal welfare perspective, lower amounts of the stress hormone cortisol were found on the extensively managed case-study farm.
羊肉生产提供了至关重要的景观管理和生态系统服务;然而,反刍动物养殖产生了全球相当一部分的温室气体排放。为了衡量和比较集约化畜牧业的优缺点,本研究通过结合环境影响分析和动物福利评估进行了综合分析。这种方法尚属首次,也是本文的创新之处。生命周期评估(LCA)方法要求对产品、服务和资源在其生命周期内的各种影响类别及相关排放量进行全面分析,包括资源提取与加工、生产过程、运输、使用以及生命周期结束阶段。LCA的概述在DIN EN ISO 14040/14044中是标准化的。为了评估意大利北部羊肉生产对环境的影响,使用LCA软件GaBi进行了两个案例研究。该分析基于来自两个绵羊养殖系统(分别在高山和大陆生物区域的半粗放式和半集约化系统)的原始数据,并结合了GaBi数据库中的清单数据和文献数据。评估以1千克羊肉的功能单位进行,重点关注全球变暖潜势、酸化潜势和富营养化潜势等影响类别。为了对供应链进行全面评估,我们还考虑了一个表明动物福利的参数,以符合消费者的关注,采用了如皮质醇积累所示的慢性应激分析。目标是得出在不损害动物福利、肉质和竞争力的情况下高效、更可持续利用资源的模型和建议。本研究的目的是为未来欧洲羊肉生产系统的个性化可持续性分析提供一个标准。从LCA角度来看,与所研究的更粗放经营的农场相比,集约化程度更高的案例研究农场在全球影响因素方面影响较低,而在局部影响类别方面影响较高。从动物福利角度来看,在粗放管理的案例研究农场中发现的应激激素皮质醇含量较低。