McDonough Gregory, Khaing Phue, Treacy Taylor, McGrath Christopher, Yoo Erika J
Department of Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
Crit Care Explor. 2020 Oct 16;2(10):e0257. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000257. eCollection 2020 Oct.
Limited evidence is available regarding the role of high-flow nasal oxygen in the management of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure secondary to coronavirus disease 2019. Our objective was to characterize outcomes associated with high-flow nasal oxygen use in critically ill adult patients with coronavirus disease 2019-associated acute hypoxemic respiratory failure.
Observational cohort study between March 18, 2020, and June 3, 2020.
Nine ICUs at three university-affiliated hospitals in Philadelphia, PA.
Adult ICU patients with confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 infection admitted with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure.
None.
Of 266 coronavirus disease 2019 ICU admissions during the study period, 124 (46.6%) received some form of noninvasive respiratory support. After exclusions, we analyzed 83 patients who were treated with high-flow nasal oxygen as a first-line therapy at or near the time of ICU admission. Patients were predominantly male (63.9%). The most common comorbidity was hypertension (60.2%). Progression to invasive mechanical ventilation was common, occurring in 58 patients (69.9%). Of these, 30 (51.7%) were intubated on the same day as ICU admission. As of June 30, 2020, hospital mortality rate was 32.9% and the median hospital length of stay was 15 days. Among survivors, the most frequent discharge disposition was home (51.0%). In comparing patients who received high-flow nasal oxygen alone ( = 54) with those who received high-flow nasal oxygen in conjunction with noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation via face mask ( = 29), there were no differences in the rates of endotracheal intubation or other clinical and utilization outcomes.
We observed an overall high usage of high-flow nasal oxygen in our cohort of critically ill patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure secondary to coronavirus disease 2019. Rates of endotracheal intubation and mortality in this cohort were on par with and certainly not higher than other published series. These findings should prompt further considerations regarding the use of high-flow nasal oxygen in the management algorithm for coronavirus disease 2019-associated acute hypoxemic respiratory failure.
关于高流量鼻导管吸氧在2019冠状病毒病继发的急性低氧性呼吸衰竭管理中的作用,现有证据有限。我们的目的是描述在患有2019冠状病毒病相关急性低氧性呼吸衰竭的危重症成年患者中使用高流量鼻导管吸氧的相关结局。
2020年3月18日至2020年6月3日期间的观察性队列研究。
宾夕法尼亚州费城三家大学附属医院的9个重症监护病房。
确诊感染2019冠状病毒病且因急性低氧性呼吸衰竭入院的成年重症监护病房患者。
无。
在研究期间的266例2019冠状病毒病重症监护病房入院患者中,124例(46.6%)接受了某种形式的无创呼吸支持。排除后,我们分析了83例在重症监护病房入院时或接近入院时接受高流量鼻导管吸氧作为一线治疗的患者。患者以男性为主(63.9%)。最常见的合并症是高血压(60.2%)。进展为有创机械通气很常见,58例(69.9%)患者出现这种情况。其中,30例(51.7%)在重症监护病房入院当天进行了气管插管。截至2020年6月30日,医院死亡率为32.9%,中位住院时间为15天。在幸存者中,最常见的出院处置方式是回家(51.0%)。在比较单纯接受高流量鼻导管吸氧的患者(n = 54)和接受高流量鼻导管吸氧联合面罩无创正压通气的患者(n = 29)时,气管插管率或其他临床及使用结局方面没有差异。
在我们患有2019冠状病毒病继发急性低氧性呼吸衰竭的危重症患者队列中,我们观察到高流量鼻导管吸氧的总体使用率较高。该队列中的气管插管率和死亡率与其他已发表系列相当,肯定不高于其他系列。这些发现应促使人们进一步考虑在2019冠状病毒病相关急性低氧性呼吸衰竭的管理方案中使用高流量鼻导管吸氧。