Suppr超能文献

机器人辅助双间室膝关节置换术与全膝关节置换术相比,能更好地维持膝关节的解剖结构:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。

Robotic arm-assisted bi-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty maintains natural knee joint anatomy compared with total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.

Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK.

出版信息

Bone Joint J. 2020 Nov;102-B(11):1511-1518. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B11.BJJ-2020-1166.R1.

Abstract

AIMS

The aim of this study was to compare robotic arm-assisted bi-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (bi-UKA) with conventional mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in order to determine the changes in the anatomy of the knee and alignment of the lower limb following surgery.

METHODS

An analysis of 38 patients who underwent TKA and 32 who underwent bi-UKA was performed as a secondary study from a prospective, single-centre, randomized controlled trial. CT imaging was used to measure coronal, sagittal, and axial alignment of the knee preoperatively and at three months postoperatively to determine changes in anatomy that had occurred as a result of the surgery. The hip-knee-ankle angle (HKAA) was also measured to identify any differences between the two groups.

RESULTS

The pre- to postoperative changes in joint anatomy were significantly less in patients undergoing bi-UKA in all three planes in both the femur and tibia, except for femoral sagittal component orientation in which there was no difference. Overall, for the six parameters of alignment (three femoral and three tibial), 47% of bi-UKAs and 24% TKAs had a change of < 2° (p = 0.045). The change in HKAA towards neutral in varus and valgus knees was significantly less in patients undergoing bi-UKA compared with those undergoing TKA (p < 0.001). Alignment was neutral in those undergoing TKA (mean 179.5° (SD 3.2°)) while those undergoing bi-UKA had mild residual varus or valgus alignment (mean 177.8° (SD 3.4°)) (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Robotic-assisted, cruciate-sparing bi-UKA maintains the natural anatomy of the knee in the coronal, sagittal, and axial planes better, and may therefore preserve normal joint kinematics, compared with a mechanically aligned TKA. This includes preservation of coronal joint line obliquity. HKAA alignment was corrected towards neutral significantly less in patients undergoing bi-UKA, which may represent restoration of the pre-disease constitutional alignment (p < 0.001). Cite this article: 2020;102-B(11):1511-1518.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较机器人辅助单髁膝关节置换术(bi-UKA)与传统机械对线全膝关节置换术(TKA),以确定手术后膝关节解剖结构和下肢对线的变化。

方法

对前瞻性、单中心、随机对照试验的 38 例行 TKA 和 32 例行 bi-UKA 的患者进行了分析。术前和术后 3 个月,使用 CT 成像测量膝关节冠状面、矢状面和轴面的对线,以确定手术导致的解剖结构变化。还测量了髋膝踝角(HKAA)以确定两组之间的差异。

结果

在所有三个平面上,bi-UKA 患者的关节解剖结构术前到术后的变化在股骨和胫骨均明显小于 TKA 患者,除了股骨矢状面组件方向没有差异。总体而言,对于六个对线参数(三个股骨和三个胫骨),47%的 bi-UKA 和 24%的 TKA 变化<2°(p=0.045)。与 TKA 相比,bi-UKA 患者的 HKAA 向内翻和外翻中立位的变化明显较小(p<0.001)。TKA 患者的对线为中立位(平均 179.5°(SD 3.2°)),而 bi-UKA 患者则存在轻微的残余内翻或外翻对线(平均 177.8°(SD 3.4°))(p<0.001)。

结论

与机械对线的 TKA 相比,机器人辅助、保留交叉韧带的 bi-UKA 更好地保持了膝关节在冠状面、矢状面和轴面的自然解剖结构,因此可能保留了正常的关节运动学。这包括保留冠状面关节线倾斜度。bi-UKA 患者的 HKAA 对线向中立位的校正明显较小,这可能代表了对疾病前固有对线的恢复(p<0.001)。

参考文献

2020;102-B(11):1511-1518.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5717/7954184/8b47ecec1a9b/BJJ-102B-1511-g0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验