• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用浮选和筛分离方法对 Labarrus pseudolividus(鞘翅目:金龟科)和 Onthophagus taurus(鞘翅目:金龟科)进行抽样效果和生存率的研究。

Sampling Efficacy and Survival Rates of Labarrus pseudolividus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) and Onthophagus taurus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) Using Flotation and Sieve-Separation Methodology.

机构信息

Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Grinnells Animal Health Laboratories, Raleigh, NC.

出版信息

J Insect Sci. 2020 Nov 1;20(6). doi: 10.1093/jisesa/ieaa083.

DOI:10.1093/jisesa/ieaa083
PMID:33135751
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7751142/
Abstract

Understanding collection methodologies and their limitations are essential when targeting specific arthropods for use in habitat restoration, conservation, laboratory colony formation, or when holistically representing local populations using ecological surveys. For dung beetles, the most popular collection methodology is baited traps, followed by light traps and unbaited flight-intercept traps during diversity surveys. A less common collection method, flotation, is assumed to be laborious and messy, and so only a handful of papers exist on its refinement and strengths. Our purpose was threefold: First, we tested the recovery and survival rates of Labarrus (=Aphodius) pseudolividus (Balthasar) and Onthophagus taurus (Schreber) when floating beetle-seeded dung pats to determine potential collection and safety issues. We collected 72.4 and 78% of the seeded L. pseudolividus and O. taurus, respectively, with >95% survival rating. Second, we developed a flotation-sieving technique that enables users to rapidly collect and passively sort dung beetles with less time and effort. Specifically, we often collected 50-100 g of wild dung beetles within a couple of hours of gathering dung and sorted them in a couple more by allowing dung beetles to sort themselves by size within a series of sieves; Third, we reviewed flotation-based advantages and disadvantages in comparison to other methodologies.

摘要

了解收集方法及其局限性对于针对特定节肢动物进行栖息地恢复、保护、实验室群体形成非常重要,或者在使用生态调查全面代表当地种群时也是如此。对于蜣螂,最流行的收集方法是诱饵陷阱,其次是在多样性调查中使用灯光陷阱和无诱饵飞行拦截陷阱。浮选是一种不太常见的收集方法,被认为既费力又麻烦,因此只有少数几篇论文涉及到它的改进和优势。我们的目的有三个:首先,我们测试了浮选矿 seeded 粪块时 Labarrus(=Aphodius)pseudolividus(Balthasar)和 Onthophagus taurus(Schreber)的回收率和存活率,以确定潜在的收集和安全问题。我们分别收集了 72.4%和 78%的 seeded L. pseudolividus 和 O. taurus,存活率均超过 95%。其次,我们开发了一种浮选筛选技术,使用户能够更快速地收集和被动地对蜣螂进行分类,同时减少时间和精力。具体来说,我们通常在收集粪便后的几个小时内收集 50-100 克野生蜣螂,并通过让蜣螂在一系列筛子中按大小自行分类来在几个小时内对它们进行分类;第三,我们比较了浮选与其他方法相比的优缺点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7e5/7751142/7fce131172ea/ieaa083_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7e5/7751142/112f652d3551/ieaa083_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7e5/7751142/5b75588beb71/ieaa083_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7e5/7751142/9c2240114039/ieaa083_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7e5/7751142/7fce131172ea/ieaa083_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7e5/7751142/112f652d3551/ieaa083_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7e5/7751142/5b75588beb71/ieaa083_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7e5/7751142/9c2240114039/ieaa083_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7e5/7751142/7fce131172ea/ieaa083_fig4.jpg

相似文献

1
Sampling Efficacy and Survival Rates of Labarrus pseudolividus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) and Onthophagus taurus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) Using Flotation and Sieve-Separation Methodology.利用浮选和筛分离方法对 Labarrus pseudolividus(鞘翅目:金龟科)和 Onthophagus taurus(鞘翅目:金龟科)进行抽样效果和生存率的研究。
J Insect Sci. 2020 Nov 1;20(6). doi: 10.1093/jisesa/ieaa083.
2
Carbon Neutral: The Failure of Dung Beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) to Affect Dung-Generated Greenhouse Gases in the Pasture.碳中和:粪甲虫(鞘翅目:金龟科)对牧场中粪便产生的温室气体没有影响
Environ Entomol. 2020 Oct 17;49(5):1105-1116. doi: 10.1093/ee/nvaa094.
3
Optimising Methods for Dung Beetle (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) Sampling in Brazilian Pastures.优化巴西牧场蜣螂(鞘翅目:金龟科)采样方法
Environ Entomol. 2018 Feb 8;47(1):48-54. doi: 10.1093/ee/nvx191.
4
Phenology, Distribution, and Diversity of Dung Beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) in North Florida's Pastures and Forests.佛罗里达州北部牧场和森林中蜣螂(鞘翅目:金龟科)的物候、分布与多样性
Environ Entomol. 2019 Aug 5;48(4):847-855. doi: 10.1093/ee/nvz068.
5
Effects of the insect growth regulator, methoprene, on Onthophagus taurus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae).昆虫生长调节剂烯虫酯对金牛座嗡蜣螂(鞘翅目:金龟科)的影响。
Environ Entomol. 2009 Apr;38(2):493-8. doi: 10.1603/022.038.0224.
6
A comparison of dung beetle (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) attraction to native and exotic mammal dung.蜣螂(鞘翅目:金龟科)对本地和外来哺乳动物粪便的吸引力比较。
Environ Entomol. 2012 Apr;41(2):238-44. doi: 10.1603/EN11285.
7
Brood ball-mediated transmission of microbiome members in the dung beetle, Onthophagus taurus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae).在蜣螂(食粪金龟,鞘翅目:金龟科)中,育幼球介导微生物群落成员的传播。
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 1;8(11):e79061. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079061. eCollection 2013.
8
The Attraction of Amazonian Dung Beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) to the Feces of Omnivorous Mammals Is Dependent on Their Diet: Implications for Ecological Monitoring.亚马逊蜣螂(鞘翅目:金龟子科:蜣螂亚科)对杂食性哺乳动物粪便的吸引力取决于其饮食:对生态监测的启示。
Environ Entomol. 2020 Dec 14;49(6):1383-1392. doi: 10.1093/ee/nvaa106.
9
Field-scale dispersal of Aphodius dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) in response to avermectin treatments on pastured cattle.阿弗菌素处理放牧牛后,蜣螂(鞘翅目:金龟科)在田间尺度上的扩散
Bull Entomol Res. 2010 Apr;100(2):175-83. doi: 10.1017/S0007485309006981. Epub 2009 Jul 9.
10
Dung removal by dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) and macrocyclic lactone use on cattle ranches of Yucatan, Mexico.墨西哥尤卡坦半岛养牛场中蜣螂(鞘翅目:金龟科)清除粪便及大环内酯类药物的使用情况
Rev Biol Trop. 2016 Sep;64(3):945-54. doi: 10.15517/rbt.v64i3.21044.

引用本文的文献

1
Special Collection: Protocols in Medical and Veterinary Entomology.特刊:医学与兽医昆虫学实验方案
J Insect Sci. 2020 Nov 1;20(6). doi: 10.1093/jisesa/ieaa122.

本文引用的文献

1
Minimizing Bee (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) Bycatch in Japanese Beetle Traps.减少日本金龟子诱捕器中蜜蜂(膜翅目:蜜蜂总科)的兼捕量。
Environ Entomol. 2019 Sep 30;48(5):1203-1213. doi: 10.1093/ee/nvz098.
2
Pheromone Lure and Trap Color Affects Bycatch in Agricultural Landscapes of Utah.信息素诱捕器和诱捕器颜色对犹他州农业景观中副渔获物的影响。
Environ Entomol. 2016 Aug;45(4):1009-16. doi: 10.1093/ee/nvw085. Epub 2016 Jul 12.
3
Quantifying responses of dung beetles to fire disturbance in tropical forests: the importance of trapping method and seasonality.
量化热带森林中蜣螂对火灾干扰的响应:陷阱方法和季节性的重要性。
PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e26208. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026208. Epub 2011 Oct 18.
4
Bycatch of marine mammals in U.S. and global fisheries.美国及全球渔业中海洋哺乳动物的兼捕情况。
Conserv Biol. 2006 Feb;20(1):163-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00338.x.