Suppr超能文献

患者报告结局信息系统(PROMIS)瘙痒问卷的测量特性:特应性皮炎成人瘙痒严重程度评估。

Measurement properties of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Information System (PROMIS ) Itch Questionnaire: itch severity assessments in adults with atopic dermatitis.

出版信息

Br J Dermatol. 2020 Nov;183(5):e149-e170. doi: 10.1111/bjd.19510.

Abstract

Itch is the most common and burdensome symptom of atopic dermatitis (AD, also simply known as eczema). However, there is limited data to support the validity of different approaches to measure the severity of itch in AD, such as numeric rating scales (NRS), verbal rating scales (VRS), and frequency of itch. In this study, we set out to determine the measurement properties of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Information System (PROMIS ) Itch Questionnaire (PIQ) itch severity assessment, including multiple NRS, VRS and frequency of itch assessments in adults with AD. We evaluated a group of 410 adults with AD who were patients at an academic medical center. We measured AD severity using multiple self and clinician-assessments. We used the PIQ itch severity scales to assess their itch severity. PIQ NRS, VRS and frequency of itch had good content validity (i.e. made sense to patients and were relevant to patient-experience in AD). PIQ NRS, VRS and frequency of itch showed good concurrent (i.e. correlated well with each other), convergent (i.e. correlated well with other measures of AD severity) and discriminant (i.e. scores were able to predict more severe AD) validity. PIQ NRS, VRS and frequency of itch also showed good measurement properties with respect to feasibility for use in clinical practice, reliability, and responsiveness. This suggests that PIQ NRS, VRS and frequency of itch have good validity for assessing itch in adults with AD. We recommend that clinicians screen all AD patients for itch severity. Linked Article: Silverberg et al. Br J Dermatol 2020; 183:891-898.

摘要

瘙痒是特应性皮炎(AD,也简称为湿疹)最常见和最令人困扰的症状。然而,支持使用不同方法来衡量 AD 瘙痒严重程度的有效性的数据有限,例如数字评定量表(NRS)、言语评定量表(VRS)和瘙痒频率。在这项研究中,我们旨在确定患者报告的结局信息系统(PROMIS)瘙痒问卷(PIQ)瘙痒严重程度评估的测量特性,包括成人 AD 患者的多种 NRS、VRS 和瘙痒频率评估。我们评估了一组 410 名在学术医疗中心就诊的 AD 成人患者。我们使用多种自我和临床医生评估来衡量 AD 的严重程度。我们使用 PIQ 瘙痒严重程度量表来评估他们的瘙痒严重程度。PIQ NRS、VRS 和瘙痒频率具有良好的内容有效性(即对患者有意义,与 AD 患者的体验相关)。PIQ NRS、VRS 和瘙痒频率具有良好的同时有效性(即彼此相关性良好)、收敛有效性(即与 AD 严重程度的其他衡量标准相关性良好)和区分有效性(即评分能够预测更严重的 AD)。PIQ NRS、VRS 和瘙痒频率在临床实践中的使用可行性、可靠性和反应性方面也具有良好的测量特性。这表明 PIQ NRS、VRS 和瘙痒频率在评估成人 AD 患者的瘙痒方面具有良好的有效性。我们建议临床医生对所有 AD 患者进行瘙痒严重程度筛查。相关文章:Silverberg 等人,《英国皮肤病学杂志》2020;183:891-898。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验