• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用名义群体技术为澳大利亚的学校食品供应模式提出利益相关者的替代方案。

Stakeholder Generated Ideas for Alternative School Food Provision Models in Australia Using the Nominal Group Technique.

机构信息

Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park 5042, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 29;17(21):7935. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17217935.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph17217935
PMID:33138030
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7663195/
Abstract

Good nutrition is important for children's learning, growth, and development, yet food intake during school hours does not align with recommendations. In Australia, most school children currently bring a packed lunch from home, but what if there was a different way? This project aimed to engage a diverse range of stakeholders to (1) generate, refine and prioritize ideas for novel models of food provision to Australian children within school hours, and (2) to determine and rank the potential barriers and facilitators to changing the school food provision system. This study used nominal group technique virtual workshops-three idea generation workshops ( = 21 participants) and one consensus workshop ( = 11 participants). School lunch prepared onsite was the top ranked food provision model option based on impact and achievability. Potential barriers ( = 26) and facilitators ( = 28) to changing the school food system were generated. The top ranked barrier and facilitator related to government support. This study highlights that there is an opportunity to explore partnerships and utilize existing skills and infrastructure to introduce a universal school-provided lunch model in Australia. The next steps should focus on building the business case capturing the social value of investing in school lunches, including considering parent-paid and subsidized options.

摘要

良好的营养对于儿童的学习、成长和发育很重要,然而在上学期间,孩子们的食物摄入量并不符合建议。在澳大利亚,大多数在校儿童目前从家里带盒饭,但如果有其他方式呢?该项目旨在让不同利益相关者参与进来:(1)为澳大利亚儿童在校期间提供新颖的食品供应模式生成、完善和优先考虑各种想法;(2)确定并对改变学校食品供应系统的潜在障碍和促进因素进行排序。本研究采用名义群体技术虚拟研讨会——三次创意生成研讨会(=21 名参与者)和一次共识研讨会(=11 名参与者)。基于影响力和可实现性,现场制作的学校午餐被评为最佳食品供应模式选项。针对改变学校食品系统的潜在障碍(=26)和促进因素(=28)也已生成。排名最高的障碍和促进因素与政府支持有关。本研究表明,有机会探索伙伴关系并利用现有技能和基础设施,在澳大利亚引入普遍的学校提供午餐模式。下一步应重点构建商业案例,挖掘投资学校午餐的社会价值,包括考虑家长付费和补贴选项。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b96c/7663195/a353c05e6179/ijerph-17-07935-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b96c/7663195/a353c05e6179/ijerph-17-07935-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b96c/7663195/a353c05e6179/ijerph-17-07935-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Stakeholder Generated Ideas for Alternative School Food Provision Models in Australia Using the Nominal Group Technique.采用名义群体技术为澳大利亚的学校食品供应模式提出利益相关者的替代方案。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 29;17(21):7935. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17217935.
2
A repeated cross-sectional survey assessing changes in diet and nutrient quality of English primary school children's packed lunches between 2006 and 2016.一项重复横断面调查评估了 2006 年至 2016 年期间英国小学生课间餐的饮食和营养质量变化。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jan 13;10(1):e029688. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029688.
3
School lunches v. packed lunches: a comparison of secondary schools in England following the introduction of compulsory school food standards.学校午餐与自带午餐的比较:在英国实施学校食品标准后的中学比较。
Public Health Nutr. 2013 Jun;16(6):1037-42. doi: 10.1017/S1368980013000852. Epub 2013 Apr 11.
4
Lunchtime food and nutrient intakes of secondary-school pupils; a comparison of school lunches and packed lunches following the introduction of mandatory food-based standards for school lunch.中小学生午餐的食物和营养摄入量;在实施学校午餐强制性基于食物标准后,对学校午餐和自带午餐的比较。
Public Health Nutr. 2013 Jun;16(6):1126-31. doi: 10.1017/S1368980012003928. Epub 2012 Aug 24.
5
A comparison of British school meals and packed lunches from 1990 to 2007: meta-analysis by lunch type.1990 年至 2007 年英国学校餐与盒装午餐的比较:按午餐类型进行的荟萃分析。
Br J Nutr. 2010 Aug;104(4):474-87. doi: 10.1017/S0007114510001601. Epub 2010 May 26.
6
Exploring Australian children's perceptions of a school-provided lunch model using a story completion method.采用故事补全法探究澳大利亚儿童对学校提供午餐模式的看法。
Health Promot Int. 2023 Oct 1;38(5). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daad118.
7
The impact of food and nutrient-based standards on primary school children's lunch and total dietary intake: a natural experimental evaluation of government policy in England.基于食物和营养素的标准对小学生午餐及总体膳食摄入量的影响:对英国政府政策的一项自然实验评估
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 30;8(10):e78298. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078298. eCollection 2013.
8
The ultra-processed food content of school meals and packed lunches in the UK, 2008-17: a pooled cross-sectional study.英国学校餐和打包午餐中超加工食品的含量,2008-2017 年:一项汇总的横断面研究。
Lancet. 2022 Nov;400 Suppl 1:S12. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)02222-X. Epub 2022 Nov 24.
9
Parental support for free school lunches in Australian primary schools: associated factors and perceived barriers.澳大利亚小学中家长对免费校餐的支持:相关因素和感知障碍。
Public Health Nutr. 2023 Dec;26(12):3320-3330. doi: 10.1017/S1368980023002240. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
10
Children's lunchtime food choices following the introduction of food-based standards for school meals: observations from six primary schools in Sheffield.儿童在学校午餐引入基于食物标准后的食物选择:谢菲尔德六所小学的观察结果。
Public Health Nutr. 2011 Feb;14(2):271-8. doi: 10.1017/S1368980010002120. Epub 2010 Aug 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Are Cooked Nutritious School Lunches Associated with Improved Attendance? Findings from the 2022-2023 Tasmanian School Lunch Project.学校午餐是否与改善出勤率有关?2022-2023 塔斯马尼亚学校午餐项目的发现。
Nutrients. 2024 Oct 6;16(19):3393. doi: 10.3390/nu16193393.
2
The use of virtual nominal groups in healthcare research: An extended scoping review.在医疗保健研究中使用虚拟名词短语:扩展范围综述。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 12;19(6):e0302437. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302437. eCollection 2024.
3
Identifying the top 10 research priorities for the school food system in the UK: a priority setting exercise.

本文引用的文献

1
Understanding the influence of physical resources and social supports on primary food providers' snack food provision: a discrete choice experiment.理解物质资源和社会支持对主要食物供应者提供零食的影响:一项离散选择实验。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Nov 30;17(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-01062-y.
2
Priority setting for school nutrition research: developing a collaborative research agenda.学校营养研究的重点制定:制定协作研究议程。
Can J Public Health. 2020 Dec;111(6):1020-1023. doi: 10.17269/s41997-020-00331-4. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
3
The importance of school lunches to the overall dietary intake of children in Sweden: a nationally representative study.
确定英国学校食品系统的 10 大研究重点:优先事项设定练习。
BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 14;14(3):e081400. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081400.
4
Exploring Australian children's perceptions of a school-provided lunch model using a story completion method.采用故事补全法探究澳大利亚儿童对学校提供午餐模式的看法。
Health Promot Int. 2023 Oct 1;38(5). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daad118.
5
Protocol for an extended scoping review on the use of virtual nominal group technique in research.关于在研究中使用虚拟名义群体技术的扩展范围评价研究方案。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 20;18(1):e0280764. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280764. eCollection 2023.
6
Research on Mediating Mechanisms and the Impact on Food Provision Services in Poor Areas from the Perspective of Stakeholders.从利益相关者视角研究贫困地区食物供给服务的中介机制及其影响
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 7;18(19):10510. doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910510.
7
The food and nutrient intake of 5- to 12-year-old Australian children during school hours: a secondary analysis of the 2011-2012 National Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey.5 至 12 岁澳大利亚儿童在校期间的食物和营养素摄入量:2011-2012 年全国营养和身体活动调查的二次分析。
Public Health Nutr. 2021 Dec;24(18):5985-5994. doi: 10.1017/S1368980021003888. Epub 2021 Sep 8.
学校午餐对瑞典儿童整体饮食摄入的重要性:一项全国代表性研究。
Public Health Nutr. 2020 Jul;23(10):1705-1715. doi: 10.1017/S1368980020000099. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
4
Research co-design in health: a rapid overview of reviews.健康领域的研究共同设计:综述快速概览。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Feb 11;18(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-0528-9.
5
A cross-sectional study to determine the energy density and nutritional quality of primary-school children's lunchboxes.横断面研究确定小学生午餐盒的能量密度和营养质量。
Public Health Nutr. 2020 Apr;23(6):1108-1116. doi: 10.1017/S1368980019003379. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
6
A cross-sectional study of the nutritional quality of student canteen purchases from New South Wales primary-school canteens.对新南威尔士州小学食堂学生食堂购买食品的营养质量进行的横断面研究。
Public Health Nutr. 2019 Nov;22(16):3092-3100. doi: 10.1017/S1368980019001903. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
7
The effectiveness of lunchbox interventions on improving the foods and beverages packed and consumed by children at centre-based care or school: a systematic review and meta-analysis.基于中心照护或学校的儿童携带和食用食物与饮料的午餐盒干预措施的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019 Apr 29;16(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12966-019-0798-1.
8
Measuring and Understanding Food Insecurity in Australia: A Systematic Review.测量和理解澳大利亚的粮食不安全:系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Feb 6;16(3):476. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16030476.
9
Comparison of school day eating behaviours of 8-11 year old children from Adelaide, South Australia, and London, England: Child eating behaviours in South Australia and England.对来自南澳大利亚阿德莱德和英国伦敦的8至11岁儿童上学日饮食行为的比较:南澳大利亚和英国儿童的饮食行为。
AIMS Public Health. 2018 Oct 25;5(4):394-410. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2018.4.394. eCollection 2018.
10
'Sustainable' Rather Than 'Subsistence' Food Assistance Solutions to Food Insecurity: South Australian Recipients' Perspectives on Traditional and Social Enterprise Models.以可持续而非生存为目标的粮食援助解决方案以应对粮食不安全:南澳大利亚粮食援助接受者对传统和社会企业模式的看法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Sep 21;15(10):2086. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15102086.