• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

确定英国学校食品系统的 10 大研究重点:优先事项设定练习。

Identifying the top 10 research priorities for the school food system in the UK: a priority setting exercise.

机构信息

Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.

Human Nutrition & Exercise Research Centre, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 14;14(3):e081400. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081400.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081400
PMID:38485482
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10941135/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The school food system varies widely between schools and across the UK. There is a need to understand evidence gaps in school food research to allow the development, implementation and evaluation of policies and interventions to support children's healthy eating at school. This study aimed to conduct a priority setting exercise to co-produce research priorities in relation to the UK school food system.

METHODS

The James Lind Alliance process informed this priority setting exercise; all key steps engaged a wide range of UK school food stakeholders (including teachers, parents, principals, school governors, policymakers, caterers). An initial online stakeholder survey identified perceived research priorities. In a second survey, stakeholders were asked to rank these priorities. Lastly, an online priority setting workshop with stakeholders elicited the most important research priorities.

RESULTS

In 2021, school food stakeholders (n=1280) completed the first survey, from which 136 research priorities were identified. In the second survey, participants (n=107) ranked these research priorities regarding their importance. Lastly, 30 workshop participants discussed and reached consensus on the research priorities. After final refinement by the research team, 18 priorities resulted, with the top 10 being related to the provision of free school meals (effectiveness of cost-effectiveness of different levels of eligibility, including universal provision), implementation of policy (including improving uptake) and food standards, issues around procurement, leadership, inequalities, social norms, the eating environment, food culture throughout the school setting and healthy eating.

CONCLUSION

The top 10 research priorities were elicited through a rigorous approach, including a wide range of stakeholders across the UK. These should be considered by policymakers, researchers and others to inform research, evidence-based policy development and, ultimately, improve the UK school food system.

摘要

简介

英国各学校的校园食品系统差异较大。为了制定、实施和评估支持儿童在校健康饮食的政策和干预措施,我们需要了解校园食品研究中的证据空白。本研究旨在开展一项优先事项制定工作,共同制定与英国校园食品系统相关的研究优先事项。

方法

本优先事项制定工作采用詹姆斯·林德联盟(James Lind Alliance)流程;所有关键步骤都让英国校园食品的各个利益攸关方(包括教师、家长、校长、学校理事、政策制定者、餐饮服务商)广泛参与。初步的在线利益攸关方调查确定了他们认为的研究优先事项。在第二次调查中,要求利益攸关方对这些优先事项进行排名。最后,通过在线利益攸关方研讨会,了解并确定最重要的研究优先事项。

结果

2021 年,校园食品利益攸关方(n=1280)完成了第一次调查,从中确定了 136 项研究优先事项。在第二次调查中,参与者(n=107)对这些研究优先事项的重要性进行了排名。最后,30 名研讨会参与者对研究优先事项进行了讨论并达成了共识。经过研究团队的最终修订,确定了 18 项优先事项,前 10 项与提供免费校餐(不同资格水平的成本效益的有效性,包括普及性)、政策实施(包括提高参与度)和食品标准、采购问题、领导力、不平等问题、社会规范、饮食环境、校园食品文化以及健康饮食有关。

结论

通过一项严谨的方法,包括英国范围内的广泛利益攸关方,得出了前 10 项研究优先事项。这些优先事项应由政策制定者、研究人员和其他人员考虑,以为研究、循证政策制定提供信息,并最终改善英国校园食品系统。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98ef/10941135/96ed8c14a79a/bmjopen-2023-081400f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98ef/10941135/96ed8c14a79a/bmjopen-2023-081400f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98ef/10941135/96ed8c14a79a/bmjopen-2023-081400f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Identifying the top 10 research priorities for the school food system in the UK: a priority setting exercise.确定英国学校食品系统的 10 大研究重点:优先事项设定练习。
BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 14;14(3):e081400. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081400.
2
Understanding school food systems to support the development and implementation of food based policies and interventions.理解学校食品系统,以支持基于食品的政策和干预措施的制定和实施。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2023 Mar 13;20(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12966-023-01432-2.
3
Identifying research priorities in breast cancer surgery: a UK priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance.确定乳腺癌手术研究重点:英国与詹姆斯林德联盟的优先事项设定伙伴关系。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023 Jan;197(1):39-49. doi: 10.1007/s10549-022-06756-4. Epub 2022 Nov 1.
4
Identifying and prioritising unanswered research questions for people with hyperacusis: James Lind Alliance Hyperacusis Priority Setting Partnership.确定和优先考虑患有听觉过敏症人群的未解决研究问题:詹姆斯林德联盟听觉过敏优先事项设定伙伴关系。
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 21;9(11):e032178. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032178.
5
Identifying Priorities for Physiotherapy Research in the UK: the James Lind Alliance Physiotherapy Priority Setting Partnership.确定英国物理治疗研究重点:詹姆斯·林德联盟物理治疗重点制定伙伴关系。
Physiotherapy. 2020 Jun;107:161-168. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2019.07.006. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
6
Research priorities for young people with cancer: a UK priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance.癌症青少年的研究重点:英国与詹姆斯·林德联盟的优先事项设定合作项目
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 5;9(8):e028119. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028119.
7
What matters to you? Engaging with children in the James Lind Alliance Children's Cancer Priority Setting Partnership.对你来说什么重要?参与詹姆斯·林德联盟儿童癌症优先事项设定合作项目中的儿童相关工作。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Nov 30;9(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00518-2.
8
Setting the top 10 eating disorder research and translation priorities for Australia.设定澳大利亚十大饮食失调研究和转化重点。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2023 Sep;57(9):1281-1291. doi: 10.1177/00048674221128754. Epub 2022 Oct 4.
9
Setting research priorities to improve the health of children and young people with neurodisability: a British Academy of Childhood Disability-James Lind Alliance Research Priority Setting Partnership.确定研究重点,以改善患有神经残疾的儿童和年轻人的健康:英国儿童残疾学会-詹姆斯·林德联盟研究重点制定伙伴关系。
BMJ Open. 2015 Jan 28;5(1):e006233. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006233.
10
Research priorities for children's cancer: a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership in the UK.儿童癌症研究重点:英国詹姆斯林德联盟优先事项设定伙伴关系。
BMJ Open. 2023 Dec 20;13(12):e077387. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077387.

引用本文的文献

1
School-Provided Meals and the Prevention of Childhood Obesity: A Small part of a Very Important Story.学校提供的膳食与儿童肥胖预防:一个非常重要故事的一小部分。
Curr Obes Rep. 2025 May 15;14(1):44. doi: 10.1007/s13679-025-00635-x.
2
'Will my fingerprint be enough?': secondary school students struggle to purchase a healthy, tasty and sustainable meal on the UK free school meal allowance.“我的指纹就够了吗?”:英国中学生靠免费学校餐补贴难以买到健康、美味又可持续的饭菜。
Public Health Nutr. 2025 Jan 8;28(1):e19. doi: 10.1017/S1368980024002593.

本文引用的文献

1
Changes and differences in school food standards (2010-2021) and free school meal provision during COVID-19 across the UK: Potential implications for children's diets.英国学校食品标准(2010-2021 年)和 COVID-19 期间免费学校供餐的变化和差异:对儿童饮食的潜在影响。
Nutr Bull. 2022 Jun;47(2):230-245. doi: 10.1111/nbu.12556. Epub 2022 May 12.
2
Setting the top 10 priorities for obesity and weight-related research (POWeR): a stakeholder priority setting process.确定肥胖和体重相关研究的前 10 项重点(POWeR):利益相关者优先排序过程。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jul 20;12(7):e058177. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058177.
3
James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy [AO Spine RECODE-DCM]: An Overview of the Methodology Used to Process and Short-List Research Uncertainties.
詹姆斯·林德联盟退行性颈椎脊髓病优先事项设定合作项目[AO脊柱RECODE-DCM]:处理和筛选研究不确定性所用方法概述
Global Spine J. 2022 Feb;12(1_suppl):19S-27S. doi: 10.1177/21925682211062501.
4
School-Based Nutrition Interventions in Children Aged 6 to 18 Years: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews.6 至 18 岁儿童的学校营养干预措施:系统评价的伞状综述。
Nutrients. 2021 Nov 17;13(11):4113. doi: 10.3390/nu13114113.
5
Food Insecurity and Child Development: A State-of-the-Art Review.食物不安全与儿童发展:最新综述
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 26;18(17):8990. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18178990.
6
Opportunities for intervention and innovation in school food within UK schools.英国学校中学校食品的干预和创新机会。
Public Health Nutr. 2021 Jun;24(8):2313-2317. doi: 10.1017/S1368980020004668. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
7
Stakeholder Generated Ideas for Alternative School Food Provision Models in Australia Using the Nominal Group Technique.采用名义群体技术为澳大利亚的学校食品供应模式提出利益相关者的替代方案。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 29;17(21):7935. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17217935.
8
Identifying research priorities in cardiac surgery: a report from the James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership in adult heart surgery.确定心脏外科学术研究重点:成人心脏外科学术重点制定合作研究组的报告。
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 3;10(9):e038001. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038001.
9
Childhood obesity and the associated rise in cardiometabolic complications.儿童肥胖以及与之相关的心脏代谢并发症的增加。
Nat Metab. 2020 Mar;2(3):223-232. doi: 10.1038/s42255-020-0183-z. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
10
Priority setting for school nutrition research: developing a collaborative research agenda.学校营养研究的重点制定:制定协作研究议程。
Can J Public Health. 2020 Dec;111(6):1020-1023. doi: 10.17269/s41997-020-00331-4. Epub 2020 Jun 11.