• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于机器学习对疑似脑淀粉样血管病标志物患者的淀粉样 β PET 阳性预测

Prediction of amyloid β PET positivity using machine learning in patients with suspected cerebral amyloid angiopathy markers.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, College of Medicine, Myoungji Hospital, Hanyang University, Goyang, Republic of Korea.

Department of Neurology, Sungkyunkwan University of School of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2020 Nov 2;10(1):18806. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-75664-8.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-020-75664-8
PMID:33139780
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7608617/
Abstract

Amyloid-β(Aβ) PET positivity in patients with suspected cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) MRI markers is predictive of a worse cognitive trajectory, and it provides insights into the underlying vascular pathology (CAA vs. hypertensive angiopathy) to facilitate prognostic prediction and appropriate treatment decisions. In this study, we applied two interpretable machine learning algorithms, gradient boosting machine (GBM) and random forest (RF), to predict Aβ PET positivity in patients with CAA MRI markers. In the GBM algorithm, the number of lobar cerebral microbleeds (CMBs), deep CMBs, lacunes, CMBs in dentate nuclei, and age were ranked as the most influential to predict Aβ positivity. In the RF algorithm, the absence of diabetes was additionally chosen. Cut-off values of the above variables predictive of Aβ positivity were as follows: (1) the number of lobar CMBs > 16.4(GBM)/14.3(RF), (2) no deep CMBs(GBM/RF), (3) the number of lacunes > 7.4(GBM/RF), (4) age > 74.3(GBM)/64(RF), (5) no CMBs in dentate nucleus(GBM/RF). The classification performances based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve were 0.83 in GBM and 0.80 in RF. Our study demonstrates the utility of interpretable machine learning in the clinical setting by quantifying the relative importance and cutoff values of predictive variables for Aβ positivity in patients with suspected CAA markers.

摘要

淀粉样蛋白-β(Aβ) PET 阳性在疑似脑淀粉样血管病 (CAA) MRI 标志物的患者中预测认知轨迹更差,并且深入了解潜在的血管病理学(CAA 与高血压性血管病)有助于预后预测和适当的治疗决策。在这项研究中,我们应用了两种可解释的机器学习算法,梯度提升机 (GBM) 和随机森林 (RF),来预测 CAA MRI 标志物患者的 Aβ PET 阳性。在 GBM 算法中,脑叶微出血 (CMB)、深部 CMB、腔隙、齿状核 CMB 和年龄的数量被认为是预测 Aβ 阳性的最有影响力的因素。在 RF 算法中,还选择了没有糖尿病。预测 Aβ 阳性的上述变量的截断值如下:(1) 脑叶 CMB 数量 > 16.4(GBM)/14.3(RF),(2) 无深部 CMB(GBM/RF),(3) 腔隙数量 > 7.4(GBM/RF),(4) 年龄 > 74.3(GBM)/64(RF),(5) 齿状核无 CMB(GBM/RF)。基于接收者操作特征曲线下面积的分类性能在 GBM 中为 0.83,在 RF 中为 0.80。我们的研究通过量化预测变量对疑似 CAA 标志物患者 Aβ 阳性的相对重要性和截断值,展示了可解释机器学习在临床环境中的实用性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29b7/7608617/3b8a33be394a/41598_2020_75664_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29b7/7608617/c623095fd1b5/41598_2020_75664_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29b7/7608617/c148db931a91/41598_2020_75664_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29b7/7608617/3b8a33be394a/41598_2020_75664_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29b7/7608617/c623095fd1b5/41598_2020_75664_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29b7/7608617/c148db931a91/41598_2020_75664_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29b7/7608617/3b8a33be394a/41598_2020_75664_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Prediction of amyloid β PET positivity using machine learning in patients with suspected cerebral amyloid angiopathy markers.基于机器学习对疑似脑淀粉样血管病标志物患者的淀粉样 β PET 阳性预测
Sci Rep. 2020 Nov 2;10(1):18806. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-75664-8.
2
Clinical significance of amyloid β positivity in patients with probable cerebral amyloid angiopathy markers.淀粉样β阳性在可能有脑淀粉样血管病标志物的患者中的临床意义。
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019 Jun;46(6):1287-1298. doi: 10.1007/s00259-019-04314-7. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
3
Utility of cerebrovascular imaging biomarkers to detect cerebral amyloidosis.脑血管成像生物标志物在检测脑淀粉样血管病中的作用。
Alzheimers Dement. 2024 Oct;20(10):7220-7231. doi: 10.1002/alz.14207. Epub 2024 Sep 1.
4
Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy Burden and Cerebral Microbleeds: Pathological Evidence for Distinct Phenotypes.脑淀粉样血管病负担与脑微出血:不同表型的病理证据。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2021;81(1):113-122. doi: 10.3233/JAD-201536.
5
The effects of imaging markers on clinical trajectory in cerebral amyloid angiopathy: a longitudinal study in a memory clinic.影像学标志物对脑淀粉样血管病临床病程的影响:记忆门诊的纵向研究。
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2023 Jan 12;15(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s13195-023-01161-5.
6
Strictly Lobar Microbleeds Reflect Amyloid Angiopathy Regardless of Cerebral and Cerebellar Compartments.严格的叶状微出血反映了无论在脑和小脑部位的淀粉样血管病。
Stroke. 2020 Dec;51(12):3600-3607. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.028487. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
7
Cerebral Microbleed Patterns and Cortical Amyloid-β: The ARIC-PET Study.脑微出血模式与皮质淀粉样蛋白-β:ARIC-PET 研究。
Stroke. 2023 Oct;54(10):2613-2620. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.123.042835. Epub 2023 Aug 28.
8
Histopathological Correlates of Lobar Microbleeds in False-Positive Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy Cases.脑淀粉样血管病假阳性病例中微出血灶的组织病理学相关性
Ann Neurol. 2023 Nov;94(5):856-870. doi: 10.1002/ana.26761. Epub 2023 Sep 6.
9
Pathogenesis of cerebral microbleeds: In vivo imaging of amyloid and subcortical ischemic small vessel disease in 226 individuals with cognitive impairment.脑微出血的发病机制:226 名认知障碍个体中淀粉样蛋白和皮质下缺血性小血管病的体内影像学研究。
Ann Neurol. 2013 May;73(5):584-93. doi: 10.1002/ana.23845. Epub 2013 Mar 12.
10
Comparison of cerebrospinal fluid profiles in Alzheimer's disease with multiple cerebral microbleeds and cerebral amyloid angiopathy-related inflammation.阿尔茨海默病合并多发性脑微出血及脑淀粉样血管病相关炎症患者的脑脊液特征比较
J Neurol. 2017 Feb;264(2):373-381. doi: 10.1007/s00415-016-8362-2. Epub 2016 Dec 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk factors and clinical significance of neurodegenerative co-pathologies in symptomatic cerebral small vessel disease.有症状的脑小血管病中神经退行性共病的危险因素及临床意义。
J Neurol. 2025 Apr 18;272(5):349. doi: 10.1007/s00415-025-13087-z.
2
Prediction of Amyloid β-Positivity with both MRI Parameters and Cognitive Function Using Machine Learning.利用机器学习通过MRI参数和认知功能预测β淀粉样蛋白阳性
J Korean Soc Radiol. 2023 May;84(3):638-652. doi: 10.3348/jksr.2022.0084. Epub 2023 May 18.
3
Introducing a gatekeeping system for amyloid status assessment in mild cognitive impairment.

本文引用的文献

1
Concordance in detecting amyloid positivity between F-florbetaben and F-flutemetamol amyloid PET using quantitative and qualitative assessments.使用定量和定性评估方法,氟[18F]氟比他滨和氟[18F]氟脱氧葡萄糖 PET 检测淀粉样蛋白阳性的一致性。
Sci Rep. 2020 Nov 11;10(1):19576. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-76102-5.
2
Head-to-Head Comparison of 18F-Florbetaben and 18F-Flutemetamol in the Cortical and Striatal Regions.18F-氟比他滨与 18F-氟脱氧葡萄糖在皮质和纹状体区域的头对头比较。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2020;76(1):281-290. doi: 10.3233/JAD-200079.
3
Cerebellar Microbleed Distribution Patterns and Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy.
引入一种用于轻度认知障碍患者淀粉样蛋白状态评估的把关系统。
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022 Nov;49(13):4478-4489. doi: 10.1007/s00259-022-05879-6. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
小脑微出血的分布模式与脑淀粉样血管病。
Stroke. 2019 Jul;50(7):1727-1733. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.024843. Epub 2019 Jun 4.
4
Clinical significance of amyloid β positivity in patients with probable cerebral amyloid angiopathy markers.淀粉样β阳性在可能有脑淀粉样血管病标志物的患者中的临床意义。
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019 Jun;46(6):1287-1298. doi: 10.1007/s00259-019-04314-7. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
5
Infratentorial Cerebral Microbleeds in Patients with Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy.脑淀粉样血管病患者的幕下脑微出血
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018 Sep;27(9):2534-2537. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2018.05.015. Epub 2018 May 31.
6
Amyloid-PET in cerebral amyloid angiopathy: Detecting vascular amyloid deposits, not just blood.脑淀粉样血管病中的淀粉样蛋白PET:检测血管淀粉样沉积物,而非仅仅是血液。
Neurology. 2017 Oct 3;89(14):1437-1438. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004548. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
7
Amyloid positron emission tomography in sporadic cerebral amyloid angiopathy: A systematic critical update.散发性脑淀粉样血管病中的淀粉样蛋白正电子发射断层扫描:系统的重要更新
Neuroimage Clin. 2017 May 5;15:247-263. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2017.05.002. eCollection 2017.
8
Relative impact of amyloid-β, lacunes, and downstream imaging markers on cognitive trajectories.淀粉样蛋白-β、腔隙和下游影像学标志物对认知轨迹的相对影响。
Brain. 2016 Sep;139(Pt 9):2516-27. doi: 10.1093/brain/aww148. Epub 2016 Jun 21.
9
Intracranial Hemorrhage Risk in the Era of Antithrombotic Therapies for Ischemic Stroke.缺血性卒中抗栓治疗时代的颅内出血风险
Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2016 May;18(5):29. doi: 10.1007/s11936-016-0453-y.
10
Statins in Intracerebral Hemorrhage.脑出血中的他汀类药物。
Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2015 Aug;17(8):46. doi: 10.1007/s11883-015-0526-5.