From the Department of Psychology (K.M.G.), York University, Toronto; Department of Psychiatry (W.G.H.), University of British Columbia, Vancouver Canada; and Departments of Neurological Sciences (R.S.W., S.E.L., D.A.B.), Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (R.S.W., P.A.B.), and Pathology (J.A.S.), Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.
Neurology. 2020 Dec 15;95(24):e3303-e3312. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000010952. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
To determine whether serial position scores in verbal memory differentiate hippocampal-related neuropathologic outcomes, we examined these associations in a sample of older adults without dementia who underwent autopsy.
We used data from the Rush Memory and Aging Project, a longitudinal clinical-pathologic cohort study of community-dwelling adults. A total of 701 participants (mean age 82.7, 71.2% female) completed baseline cognitive evaluations and underwent brain autopsy to identify pathologic Alzheimer disease (AD), TDP-43 inclusions (defining limbic-predominant age-related TDP-43 encephalopathy [LATE]), and hippocampal sclerosis. The Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease word list memory test immediate recall trials provided serial position scores, which index the proportion of words recalled from the beginning (primacy scores) and end (recency scores) of a word list. Binary and ordinal logistic regressions examined associations between serial position scores and neuropathologic outcomes. Secondary outcomes included Alzheimer dementia and mild cognitive impairment proximate to death.
Primacy and recency scores were uncorrelated ( = 0.07). Each SD of better primacy score was associated with lower likelihood of neuropathologic changes (24% lower LATE, 31% lower pathologic AD, 37% lower hippocampal sclerosis). For pathologic AD, better baseline primacy scores were associated with a 36% lower likelihood of comorbidity with LATE or hippocampal sclerosis. Primacy scores better discriminated between clinical diagnoses proximate to death, including those with mild cognitive impairment compared to no impairment. Recency scores showed weaker or no associations.
Primacy scores may be particularly sensitive markers of AD and related hippocampal neuropathologies. The differential predictive value of serial position scores suggests they offer complementary information about disease outcomes in addition to the routinely used total recall scores.
为了确定言语记忆中的序列位置得分是否能区分与海马体相关的神经病理学结局,我们在一组没有痴呆的老年尸检样本中检查了这些关联。
我们使用了 Rush 记忆与衰老项目的数据,这是一项针对居住在社区的成年人的纵向临床病理队列研究。共有 701 名参与者(平均年龄 82.7 岁,71.2%为女性)完成了基线认知评估,并接受了大脑尸检,以确定病理阿尔茨海默病(AD)、TDP-43 包含物(定义为边缘优势型与年龄相关的 TDP-43 脑病[LATE])和海马体硬化。 Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease 单词列表记忆测试即时回忆试验提供了序列位置得分,该得分指数了从单词列表开头(首因得分)和结尾(近因得分)回忆单词的比例。二项和有序逻辑回归检查了序列位置得分与神经病理学结局之间的关联。次要结局包括死亡前的阿尔茨海默病痴呆和轻度认知障碍。
首因和近因得分之间无相关性( = 0.07)。每个标准差的更好首因得分与较低的神经病理学变化可能性相关(LATE 降低 24%,AD 病理降低 31%,海马体硬化降低 37%)。对于 AD 病理,更好的基线首因得分与 LATE 或海马体硬化的合并症可能性降低 36%相关。首因得分更好地区分了死亡前的临床诊断,包括与轻度认知障碍相比没有障碍的那些。近因得分显示出较弱或没有关联。
首因得分可能是 AD 和相关海马体神经病理学的特别敏感标志物。序列位置得分的差异预测价值表明,它们提供了除了常规使用的总回忆得分之外,关于疾病结局的补充信息。