Department of Neurology, School of Health Sciences, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Department of General Surgery, Vascular Surgery, Angiology and Phlebology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
Pol Arch Intern Med. 2021 Jan 29;131(1):17-25. doi: 10.20452/pamw.15676. Epub 2020 Nov 4.
The identification of asymptomatic patients at high risk of internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis destabilization and symptom occurrence is crucial for prognosis estimation.
This study aimed to determine differences between patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic ICA stenosis and to develop a predictive model for the risk of symptomatic stenosis based on data collected in routine clinical practice.
The study included 163 patients with asymptomatic and 182 patients with symptomatic ICA stenosis greater than 70%. The study groups were compared in terms of stroke risk factors and comorbidities, coexisting ICA stenosis on the contralateral side, atherosclerosis in other arterial territories, and the morphology of atherosclerotic plaque assessed by transcervical ultrasound.
Independent risk factors for symptomatic ICA stenosis included: male sex (odds ratio [OR], 2.94; 95% CI, 1.87-4.32; P <0.001), diabetes (OR, 2.86; 95% CI, 1.62-5.12; P <0.001), body mass index >25 kg/m2 (OR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.72-1.86; P <0.001), chronic kidney disease (OR, 3.34; 95% CI, 1.34-8.87; P = 0.007), increased‑risk features of ultrasound plaque morphology (OR, 2.52; 95% CI, 1.29-3.72; P = 0.009), and coexisting atherosclerosis in 3 or 4 vascular areas (OR, 3.72; 95% CI, 1.77-7.23; P <0.001).The sensitivity and specificity of the scoring model designed to estimate the risk of symptomatic ICA stenosis reached 77.6% and 76.9%, respectively.
This cross‑sectional study indicated that the analysis of selected imaging and clinical parameters may enable clinicians to estimate the risk of symptomatic ICA stenosis. The proposed scoring system requires further prospective validation.
识别无症状但存在颈内动脉(ICA)狭窄不稳定和症状发生高风险的患者对于预后评估至关重要。
本研究旨在确定有症状和无症状 ICA 狭窄患者之间的差异,并基于常规临床实践中收集的数据,为有症状狭窄的风险制定预测模型。
本研究纳入了 163 例无症状和 182 例症状性 ICA 狭窄大于 70%的患者。比较了两组患者的中风危险因素和合并症、对侧 ICA 狭窄并存、其他动脉区域的动脉粥样硬化以及经颈超声评估的动脉粥样硬化斑块形态。
症状性 ICA 狭窄的独立危险因素包括:男性(比值比[OR],2.94;95%置信区间[CI],1.87-4.32;P <0.001)、糖尿病(OR,2.86;95% CI,1.62-5.12;P <0.001)、体重指数(BMI)>25kg/m2(OR,1.81;95% CI,1.72-1.86;P <0.001)、慢性肾脏病(OR,3.34;95% CI,1.34-8.87;P = 0.007)、超声斑块形态的高风险特征(OR,2.52;95% CI,1.29-3.72;P = 0.009)以及 3 或 4 个血管区域并存动脉粥样硬化(OR,3.72;95% CI,1.77-7.23;P <0.001)。设计用于估计症状性 ICA 狭窄风险的评分模型的敏感性和特异性分别达到 77.6%和 76.9%。
这项横断面研究表明,对选定的影像学和临床参数进行分析可能使临床医生能够评估症状性 ICA 狭窄的风险。所提出的评分系统需要进一步的前瞻性验证。