Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychology, Clinic Institute of Neurosciences, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain.
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry/Psychotherapy, University Hospital, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2022 Jan;31(1):51-66. doi: 10.1007/s00787-020-01662-w. Epub 2020 Nov 4.
Disruptive behavior during childhood and adolescence is heterogeneous and associated with several psychiatric disorders. The identification of more homogeneous subgroups might help identify different underlying pathways and tailor treatment strategies. Children and adolescents (aged 8-18) with disruptive behaviors (N = 121) and healthy controls (N = 100) were included in a European multi-center cognition and brain imaging study. They were assessed via a battery of standardized semi-structured interviews and questionnaires. K-means cluster-model analysis was carried out to identify subgroups within the group with disruptive behaviors, based on clinical symptom profiles, callous-unemotional (CU) traits, and proactive and reactive aggression. The resulting subgroups were then compared to healthy controls with regard to these clinical variables. Three distinct subgroups were found within the group with disruptive behaviors. The High CU Traits subgroup presented elevated scores for CU traits, proactive aggression and conduct disorder (CD) symptoms, as well as a higher proportion of comorbidities (CD + oppositional defiant disorder + attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The ADHD and Affective Dysregulation subgroup showed elevated scores for internalizing and ADHD symptoms, as well as a higher proportion of females. The Low Severity subgroup had relatively low levels of psychopathology and aggressive behavior compared to the other two subgroups. The High CU Traits subgroup displayed more antisocial behaviors than the Low Severity subgroup, but did not differ when compared to the ADHD and Affective Dysregulation subgroup. All three subgroups differed significantly from the healthy controls in all the variables analyzed. The present study extends previous findings on subgrouping children and adolescents with disruptive behaviors using a multidimensional approach and describes levels of anxiety, affective problems, ADHD, proactive aggression and CU traits as key factors that differentiate conclusively between subgroups.
儿童和青少年时期的破坏性行为具有异质性,与多种精神障碍有关。识别更同质的亚组可能有助于确定不同的潜在途径,并制定治疗策略。一项欧洲多中心认知和大脑成像研究纳入了 121 名有破坏性行为的儿童和青少年(年龄 8-18 岁)和 100 名健康对照者。他们通过一系列标准化的半结构化访谈和问卷进行评估。基于临床症状谱、无情无感情(CU)特征、主动和反应性攻击,采用 K-均值聚类模型分析对有破坏性行为的儿童和青少年进行亚组分析。然后,将这些亚组与健康对照组在这些临床变量方面进行比较。在有破坏性行为的儿童和青少年中发现了三个不同的亚组。高 CU 特质亚组的 CU 特质、主动攻击和品行障碍(CD)症状评分较高,合并症比例(CD+对立违抗性障碍+注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)较高。ADHD 和情感失调亚组表现出内化和 ADHD 症状评分较高,以及女性比例较高。低严重度亚组与其他两个亚组相比,精神病理学和攻击行为的相对水平较低。高 CU 特质亚组的反社会行为比低严重度亚组多,但与 ADHD 和情感失调亚组没有差异。所有三个亚组在所有分析的变量上与健康对照组均有显著差异。本研究采用多维方法扩展了先前关于亚组分组儿童和青少年破坏性行为的研究结果,并描述了焦虑、情感问题、ADHD、主动攻击和 CU 特征的水平是区分亚组的关键因素。