• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

德国医学生的图表素养评估——一项观察性横断面调查研究。

Assessment of graph literacy among German medical students- an observational cross-sectional survey study.

作者信息

Soler Wenglein Janina, Heidenreich Andreas, Friederichs Hendrik

机构信息

Medical Education Research Group, Medical School OWL, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.

Department of Pediatrics, Medical School and University Medical Center OWL, Protestant Hospital of the Bethel Foundation, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2025 Apr 25;25(1):612. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07206-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12909-025-07206-7
PMID:40281634
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12032679/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Information literacy depends on diverse skills in processing information, including understanding graphs properly. Especially for those advising and informing people with less information, health and graph literacy, it is important to achieve high competence in these areas themselves. Graph literacy, therefore, is a form of semiotic activity that is a crucial component of overall literacy for (future) physicians. We analyzed the graph literacy of undergraduate medical students to gain knowledge about their skills and potential areas for improvement.

METHODS

An observational cross-sectional survey study was performed with undergraduate medical students in their academic years 1 to 5 using the "Graph Literacy Scale." It measures the participant's ability to read and interpret graphically provided information with 13 questions in three dimensions regarding visual data: "reading the data," "reading between the data," and "reading beyond the data." Participants can score between 0 and 13 points.

RESULTS

We obtained 449 complete questionnaires. Undergraduate medical students showed above-average test results compared to the German standard population, with an average score of 11.42 (SD = 1.42) vs. 9.4 points (SD = 2.6) points (p <.001). Although students generally scored high, one question measuring the ability to visually "read beyond the data" yielded significantly lower scores and showed variability regarding the participants' performance compared to other questions of this category.

CONCLUSIONS

While abilities in visually "reading the data" and "reading between the data" are high in our cohorts, their ability to visually "read beyond the data" is inconsistent. This requires attention in the training of medical students, as weaknesses in this area could lead to susceptibility to misleading data. Enhancing graph literacy in medical students is crucial for effective physician-patient communication.

摘要

背景

信息素养取决于处理信息的多种技能,包括正确理解图表。特别是对于那些为信息较少的人群提供建议和信息的人来说,健康素养和图表素养方面自身具备高能力很重要。因此,图表素养是一种符号学活动形式,是(未来)医生整体素养的关键组成部分。我们分析了本科医学生的图表素养,以了解他们的技能以及潜在的改进领域。

方法

使用“图表素养量表”对本科医学生1至5年级进行了一项观察性横断面调查研究。它通过关于视觉数据的三个维度的13个问题来衡量参与者阅读和解释以图形方式提供的信息的能力:“读取数据”、“数据间读取”和“数据外读取”。参与者的得分在0到13分之间。

结果

我们获得了449份完整问卷。与德国标准人群相比,本科医学生的测试结果高于平均水平,平均得分为11.42(标准差 = 1.42),而德国标准人群平均得分为9.4分(标准差 = 2.6)(p <.001)。尽管学生总体得分较高,但一个衡量视觉上“数据外读取”能力的问题得分明显较低,并且与该类别中的其他问题相比,参与者的表现存在差异。

结论

虽然我们研究对象在视觉上“读取数据”和“数据间读取”的能力较高,但他们在视觉上“数据外读取”的能力并不一致。这在医学生培训中需要引起注意,因为这方面的弱点可能导致易受误导性数据的影响。提高医学生的图表素养对于有效的医患沟通至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a787/12032679/36df25c66d44/12909_2025_7206_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a787/12032679/ec064e42a1af/12909_2025_7206_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a787/12032679/bdb5f9cd2b2f/12909_2025_7206_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a787/12032679/af8ea639cdaa/12909_2025_7206_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a787/12032679/36df25c66d44/12909_2025_7206_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a787/12032679/ec064e42a1af/12909_2025_7206_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a787/12032679/bdb5f9cd2b2f/12909_2025_7206_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a787/12032679/af8ea639cdaa/12909_2025_7206_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a787/12032679/36df25c66d44/12909_2025_7206_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessment of graph literacy among German medical students- an observational cross-sectional survey study.德国医学生的图表素养评估——一项观察性横断面调查研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Apr 25;25(1):612. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07206-7.
2
The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.档案袋对本科学生学习的教育效果:最佳证据医学教育(BEME)系统评价。BEME指南第11号。
Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):282-98. doi: 10.1080/01421590902889897.
3
A Shadow of Doubt: Is There Implicit Bias Among Orthopaedic Surgery Faculty and Residents Regarding Race and Gender?疑虑重重:骨科手术教员和住院医师在种族和性别方面是否存在隐性偏见?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jul 1;482(7):1145-1155. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002933. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
4
Exercise interventions and patient beliefs for people with hip, knee or hip and knee osteoarthritis: a mixed methods review.髋、膝或髋膝骨关节炎患者的运动干预和患者信念:一项混合方法综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 17;4(4):CD010842. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010842.pub2.
5
Whether case-based teaching combined with the flipped classroom is more valuable than traditional lecture-based teaching methods in clinical medical education: a systematic review and meta-analysis.在临床医学教育中,基于案例的教学与翻转课堂相结合是否比传统的基于讲座的教学方法更具价值:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):906. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07465-4.
6
The quantity, quality and findings of network meta-analyses evaluating the effectiveness of GLP-1 RAs for weight loss: a scoping review.评估胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1 RAs)减肥效果的网状Meta分析的数量、质量及结果:一项范围综述
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jun 25:1-73. doi: 10.3310/SKHT8119.
7
Readability analysis as a tool for evaluating English proficiency in first-year medical students.可读性分析作为评估一年级医学生英语水平的一种工具。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):945. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07348-8.
8
Prevention of self-harm and suicide in young people up to the age of 25 in education settings.在教育环境中预防25岁及以下年轻人的自我伤害和自杀行为。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 20;12(12):CD013844. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013844.pub2.
9
Early palliative care for adults with advanced cancer.晚期癌症成年患者的早期姑息治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 12;6(6):CD011129. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011129.pub2.
10
Impact of medical school on quality of life and mental health in Brazil: a cross-sectional comparative study.医学院对巴西生活质量和心理健康的影响:一项横断面比较研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 4;15(6):e097917. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-097917.

本文引用的文献

1
Is my visualization better than yours? Analyzing factors modulating exponential growth bias in graphs.我的可视化效果比你的好吗?分析图表中调节指数增长偏差的因素。
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 16;14:1125810. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1125810. eCollection 2023.
2
A longitudinal cohort study observed increasing perfectionism and declining resilience, ambiguity tolerance and calling during medical school which is not explained by student personality.一项纵向队列研究观察到,医学生的完美主义、韧性、歧义容忍度和使命感呈上升趋势,而这些变化不能用学生的个性来解释。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Nov 12;22(1):784. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03850-5.
3
Ambiguity and uncertainty tolerance and psychological needs of medical students: A cross-sectional survey.
医学生的歧义容忍度、不确定性容忍度和心理需求:一项横断面调查。
Clin Teach. 2022 Dec;19(6):e13523. doi: 10.1111/tct.13523. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
4
Therapeutic Decision-Making Under Uncertainty in the Management of Spinal Muscular Atrophy: Results From DECISIONS-SMA Study.脊髓性肌萎缩症管理中不确定性下的治疗决策:DECISIONS-SMA研究结果
Neurol Ther. 2022 Sep;11(3):1209-1219. doi: 10.1007/s40120-022-00366-4. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
5
Developing Health Literacy Communication Practices for Medical Students.培养医学生的健康素养沟通实践。
MedEdPORTAL. 2021 Jan 28;17:11091. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11091.
6
Graph literacy matters: Examining the association between graph literacy, health literacy, and numeracy in a Medicaid eligible population.图形阅读能力很重要:在符合医疗补助条件的人群中,考察图形阅读能力、健康素养和计算能力之间的关系。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 11;15(11):e0241844. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241844. eCollection 2020.
7
Tolerance for Ambiguity Among Medical Students: Patterns of Change During Medical School and Their Implications for Professional Development.医学生对模糊性的容忍度:医学生阶段的变化模式及其对专业发展的影响。
Acad Med. 2021 Jul 1;96(7):1036-1042. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003820.
8
Communication skills training for physicians improves health literacy and medical outcomes among patients with hypertension: a randomized controlled trial.医师沟通技巧培训可提高高血压患者的健康素养和医疗结局:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jan 23;20(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-4901-8.
9
Using the Short Graph Literacy Scale to Predict Precursors of Health Behavior Change.使用简短图形读写能力量表预测健康行为改变的前兆。
Med Decis Making. 2019 Apr;39(3):183-195. doi: 10.1177/0272989X19829728. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
10
[Graphical and numerical skills in pre- and postgraduate medical students from a private university].[私立大学本科及研究生医学生的图形和数字技能]
Gac Med Mex. 2018;154(2):209-216. doi: 10.24875/GMM.17003024.