Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Division of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University and Research, PO Box 8129, 6700 EV, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Sci Rep. 2020 Nov 4;10(1):19072. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-76060-y.
Distracted eating can lead to increased food intake, but it is unclear how. We aimed to assess how distraction affects motivated, goal-directed responses for food reward after satiation. Thirty-eight healthy normal-weight participants (28F; 10M) performed a visual detection task varying in attentional load (high vs. low distraction) during fMRI. Simultaneously, they exerted effort for sweet and savory food rewards by repeated button presses. Two fMRI runs were separated by sensory-specific satiation (outcome devaluation) of one of the (sweet or savory) reward outcomes, to assess outcome-sensitive, goal-directed, responses (valued vs. devalued reward, post vs. pre satiation). We could not verify our primary hypothesis that more distraction leads to less activation in ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) during goal-directed effort. Behaviorally, distraction also did not affect effort for food reward following satiation across subjects. For our secondary hypothesis, we assessed whether distraction affected other fronto-striatal regions during goal-directed effort. We did not obtain such effects at our whole-brain corrected threshold, but at an exploratory uncorrected threshold (p < 0.001), distraction decreased goal-directed responses (devalued vs. valued) in the right inferior frontal gyrus (rIFG). We continued with this rIFG region for the next secondary hypothesis; specifically, that distraction would reduce functional connectivity with the fronto-striatal regions found in the previous analyses. Indeed, distraction decreased functional connectivity between the rIFG and left putamen for valued versus devalued food rewards (pFWE(cluster) < 0.05). In an exploratory brain-behavior analysis, we showed that distraction-sensitive rIFG-responses correlated negatively (r = - 0.40; p = 0.014) with the effect of distraction on effort. Specifically, decreased distraction-related rIFG-responses were associated with increased effort for food reward after satiation. We discuss the absence of distraction effects on goal-directed responses in vmPFC and in behavior across participants. Moreover, based on our significant functional connectivity and brain-behavior results, we suggest that distraction might attenuate the ability to inhibit responses for food reward after satiation by affecting the rIFG and its connection to the putamen.
分心进食会导致食物摄入量增加,但具体机制尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估分心对饱腹感后食物奖赏的动机性、目标导向反应的影响。38 名健康的正常体重参与者(28 名女性,10 名男性)在 fMRI 期间进行视觉检测任务,该任务的注意力负荷不同(高分心与低分心)。同时,他们通过反复按按钮来为甜的和咸的食物奖赏付出努力。两次 fMRI 扫描之间通过一种(甜的或咸的)奖赏结果的感觉特异性饱足(结果去价值)来分隔,以评估结果敏感的、目标导向的反应(有价值的与去价值的奖赏,饱足后与饱足前)。我们无法验证我们的主要假设,即更多的分心会导致在目标导向努力期间腹内侧前额叶皮层(vmPFC)的激活减少。行为上,分心也不会影响饱腹感后受试者对食物奖赏的努力。对于我们的次要假设,我们评估了分心是否会在目标导向努力期间影响其他额纹状体区域。我们没有在全脑校正的阈值上获得这种影响,但在探索性未校正的阈值(p < 0.001)上,分心会减少右侧额下回(rIFG)中的目标导向反应(去价值的与有价值的)。我们继续使用这个 rIFG 区域进行下一个次要假设;具体来说,分心会减少与之前分析中发现的额纹状体区域的功能连接。事实上,分心减少了 rIFG 与左壳核之间的功能连接,用于有价值与去价值的食物奖赏(pFWE(cluster) < 0.05)。在一项探索性的脑-行为分析中,我们表明,分心敏感的 rIFG 反应与分心对努力的影响呈负相关(r = -0.40;p = 0.014)。具体来说,分心相关的 rIFG 反应减少与饱腹感后食物奖赏的努力增加有关。我们讨论了在 vmPFC 和参与者之间的行为中,分心对目标导向反应没有影响。此外,基于我们显著的功能连接和脑-行为结果,我们认为分心可能通过影响 rIFG 及其与壳核的连接来减弱饱腹感后抑制食物奖赏反应的能力。