Chukka Rakesh Reddy, Bellam Malati Devi, Marukala Narender Reddy, Dinapadu Sainath, Konda Naresh Kumar, Nagilla Jithender
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, SVS Institute of Dental Sciences, Mahabubnagar, Telangana, India.
Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, SVS Institute of Dental Sciences, Mahabubnagar, Telangana, India.
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2020 Aug;12(Suppl 1):S410-S414. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_122_20. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
The objective of this study was to compare and evaluate the accuracy of VDW Gold (VDW, Munich, Germany) integrated apex locator (IAL) and Root ZX Mini (J. Morita Corp., Kyoto, Japan) in two different irrigating solutions.
Forty patients who required extraction were included in the study. Following local anesthesia, access opening was performed under rubber dam isolation. Initial negotiation of canal was performed using size 10 K-Files (M-Access, Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland). Cervical preparation was carried out using Rotary ProTaper SX files (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) under copious irrigation with 3% sodium hypochlorite. Patients were divided into two groups of 20 each: Group I (NaOCl) and Group II (CHX). The working length (WL) was determined in triplicates for each tooth using Root ZX apex locator and with S1 ProTaper rotary file in continuous motion in case of VDW Gold IAL in the presence of 3% sodium hypochlorite and 2% chlorhexidine. Therapeutic extraction was performed and WL was determined using size 15 K-Files under 20× magnification.
The paired sample independent test showed that there was no significant difference between the Root ZX and VDW apex locator in determining the minor foramen in NaOCl group ( = 0.234, 0.453 respectively) and CHX group ( = 0.085, 0.087) when compared with actual working length.
Both the apex locators were equally effective in determining WL at 0.5 mm from the apex in presence of irrigating solutions, that is, NaOCl and chlorhexidine.
本研究的目的是比较和评估VDW Gold(德国慕尼黑VDW公司)集成式根尖定位仪(IAL)和Root ZX Mini(日本京都森田公司)在两种不同冲洗液中的准确性。
本研究纳入40例需要拔牙的患者。局部麻醉后,在橡皮障隔离下进行开髓。使用10号K锉(瑞士拜莱格Dentsply Maillefer公司的M-Access)进行根管的初始疏通。在大量使用3%次氯酸钠冲洗的情况下,使用旋转ProTaper SX锉(瑞士拜莱格Dentsply Maillefer公司)进行根管冠部预备。将患者分为两组,每组20例:第一组(NaOCl)和第二组(CHX)。在3%次氯酸钠和2%氯己定存在的情况下,对于每颗牙齿,使用Root ZX根尖定位仪一式三份确定工作长度(WL);对于VDW Gold IAL,则使用S1 ProTaper旋转锉连续运动来确定工作长度。进行治疗性拔牙,并在20倍放大下使用15号K锉确定工作长度。
配对样本独立检验显示,与实际工作长度相比,在NaOCl组(分别为 = 0.234,0.453)和CHX组( = 0.085,0.087)中,Root ZX和VDW根尖定位仪在确定根尖孔位置时无显著差异。
在冲洗液(即NaOCl和氯己定)存在的情况下,两种根尖定位仪在确定距根尖0.5毫米处的工作长度方面同样有效。