Song So-Yeon, Shin Yo-Han, Lee Jeong-Yol, Shin Sang-Wan
Department of Biomedical Science, Graduate School of Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Institute for Clinical Dental Research, Korea University Medical Center, Republic of Korea.
J Adv Prosthodont. 2020 Oct;12(5):259-264. doi: 10.4047/jap.2020.12.5.259. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
The aim of this study was to investigate and compare the color stability of provisional restorative materials fabricated by 3D printing, dental milling, and conventional materials.
For the experimental groups, two commercially available 3D-printing provisional resins (E-Dent 100; EnvisionTEC GmbH, Germany & VeroGlaze™; Stratasys®, USA), two dental milling blocks (PMMA Disk; Yamahachi Dental Co., Japan & Telio®CAD; Ivoclar Vivadent AG, Liechtenstein), and two conventional materials (Alike™; GC Co., Japan & Luxatemp automix plus; DMG, Germany) were used. The water sorption and solubility test were (n=10, respectively) carried out according to ISO4049:2000 (International Standards Organization, Geneva, Switzerland). For the color stability test (n=10), coffee and black tea were used as staining solutions, and the specimens were stored for 12 weeks. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD using SPSS version 22.0 (SPSS Inc. Chicago, IL, USA) (<.05).
Alike and Veroglaze showed the highest values and Luxatemp showed the lowest water sorption. In the color stability test, the ΔE of conventional materials varied depending on the staining solution. PMMA milling blocks showed a relatively low ΔE up to 4 weeks, and then significantly increased after 8 weeks (<.05). 3D-printed materials exhibited a high ΔE or a significant increase over time (<.05).
The degree of discoloration increased with time, and a visually perceptible color difference value (ΔE) was shown regardless of the materials and solutions. PMMA milled and 3 D-printed materials showed more rapid change in discoloration after 8 weeks.
本研究旨在调查并比较通过3D打印、牙科铣削和传统材料制作的临时修复材料的颜色稳定性。
对于实验组,使用了两种市售的3D打印临时树脂(E-Dent 100;德国EnvisionTEC GmbH公司和VeroGlaze™;美国Stratasys®公司)、两种牙科铣削块(PMMA盘;日本Yamahachi牙科公司和Telio®CAD;列支敦士登Ivoclar Vivadent AG公司)以及两种传统材料(Alike™;日本GC公司和Luxatemp automix plus;德国DMG公司)。根据ISO4049:2000(国际标准化组织,瑞士日内瓦)分别进行了吸水率和溶解度测试(每组n = 10)。对于颜色稳定性测试(n = 10),使用咖啡和红茶作为染色溶液,将样本储存12周。使用SPSS 22.0版本(美国伊利诺伊州芝加哥市SPSS公司)通过单因素方差分析和Tukey's HSD进行数据分析(<.05)。
Alike和Veroglaze的吸水率最高,Luxatemp的吸水率最低。在颜色稳定性测试中,传统材料的ΔE值因染色溶液而异。PMMA铣削块在4周内ΔE相对较低,8周后显著增加(<.05)。3D打印材料随着时间推移呈现出较高的ΔE或显著增加(<.05)。
变色程度随时间增加,无论材料和溶液如何,均呈现出视觉上可察觉的颜色差异值(ΔE)。PMMA铣削和3D打印材料在8周后变色变化更快。