Department of Operative Dentistry, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, Ibn-e-Sina Rd, G-8/3, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Department of Biomaterials, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, 405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2021 Feb;18(1):37-48. doi: 10.1007/s13770-020-00291-3. Epub 2020 Nov 4.
Autologous platelet concentrates such as platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) have gained overwhelming popularity in regenerative endodontics. Clinical evidence reveals the lack of a particular advantage of using PRP or PRF over an evoked blood clot in promoting canal wall thickening and/or continued root development in immature necrotic teeth. Moreover, despite stimulating tissue repair and repopulating the root canals of immature and mature permanent teeth, the new vital tissue may not possess the functional activity of the native pulp tissue.
To better understand the origin, nature, and long-term fate of the tissue types found within the pulp space, we critically examine all available histo-/morphological evidence for pulp-dentine complex regeneration using PRP and/or PRF, alone or together with an evoked blood clot, specialised or unspecialised primary cells, and other biomaterials.
Histological data from clinical studies is scant. Reportedly, the inner dentinal surface supports cementum-like tissue formation, but this interface likely deviates in structure and function from the native cementodentinal junction. Presence of bone-like tissue within the pulp space is intriguing since de novo osteogenesis requires closely coordinated recruitment and differentiation of osteoprogenitor cells. Compared to untreated necrotic teeth, an evoked blood clot (with/without PRF) improves fracture resistance. Tooth regeneration using PRF and dental bud cells is unreliable and the constituent neoformed tissues are poorly organised.
PRP/PRF fail to demonstrate a significant advantage over an induced blood clot, alone. The true nature of neoformed tissues remains poorly characterised while their response to subsequent insult/injury is unexplored.
自体血小板浓缩物,如富含血小板的血浆(PRP)和富含血小板的纤维蛋白(PRF),在再生牙髓学中已得到广泛应用。临床证据表明,在促进根管壁增厚和/或未成熟坏死牙的继续根发育方面,使用 PRP 或 PRF 并没有比诱发的血凝块具有特殊优势。此外,尽管刺激组织修复并重新填充未成熟和成熟恒牙的根管,但新的有活力的组织可能不具备天然牙髓组织的功能活性。
为了更好地理解牙髓腔内发现的组织类型的起源、性质和长期命运,我们批判性地检查了使用 PRP 和/或 PRF 单独或与诱发的血凝块、专门或非专门的原代细胞以及其他生物材料一起再生牙髓-牙本质复合体的所有可用的组织学/形态学证据。
临床研究中的组织学数据很少。据报道,内牙本质表面支持牙骨质样组织形成,但该界面在结构和功能上可能与天然牙骨质-牙本质交界处不同。牙髓腔内存在骨样组织很有趣,因为新骨生成需要骨祖细胞的紧密协调募集和分化。与未治疗的坏死牙相比,诱发的血凝块(有/无 PRF)可提高抗折能力。使用 PRF 和牙蕾细胞进行牙齿再生是不可靠的,并且新形成的组织排列不良。
PRP/PRF 单独使用并未显示出比诱发的血凝块有显著优势。新形成的组织的真实性质仍描述不清,而它们对后续损伤/伤害的反应尚未探索。