• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过实施和评估COVID-19评分进行风险分层:一项回顾性诊断研究

[Risk stratification through implementation and evaluation of a COVID-19 score : A retrospective diagnostic study].

作者信息

Hüfner A, Kiefl D, Baacke M, Zöllner R, Loza Mencía E, Schellein O, Avan N, Pemmerl S

机构信息

Zentrale Notaufnahme, Caritas-Krankenhaus St. Josef, Landshuter Straße 65, 93053, Regensburg, Deutschland.

Klinik für Interdisziplinäre Notfallmedizin, Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Offenbach, Deutschland.

出版信息

Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2020 Dec;115(Suppl 3):132-138. doi: 10.1007/s00063-020-00754-4. Epub 2020 Nov 6.

DOI:10.1007/s00063-020-00754-4
PMID:33156352
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7645898/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The clinical manifestation of COVID-19 is nonspecific and varies greatly, which makes it more difficult to discriminate from other (virus) infections. Neither individual findings nor combinations of findings are specific enough to be able to diagnose COVID-19 with a high degree of certainty. The goal was to identify patients in the emergency department, who are at risk for COVID-19 disease, early by using a score, so that they could be isolated pre-emptively.

METHOD

Development and implementation of a symptom-based COVID-19 score based on a multicentric retrospective evaluation in three German emergency departments from 9 March until 30 April 2020 of patients suspected of having COVID-19 and subsequent SARS-CoV‑2 PCR testing.

RESULTS

The study population included 697 patients and 9.4% of these patients were diagnosed with COVID-19 infection. A COVID-19 score of ≥5 points was associated with a significantly increased likelihood of illness. The sensitivity of the score was 98.4% with a moderate specificity of 48.3%.

DISCUSSION

The score, which is easy to obtain during the initial assessment, supports the assessment of the pretest probability for a COVID-19 infection as part of the risk stratification and can influence the treatment pathway in terms of pre-emptive isolation, PCR testing and other treatment options at an early stage. Due to the nonspecific symptoms of the disease; however, it must be accepted that the goal of high sensitivity results in a relatively low specificity of the score.

摘要

背景

新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)的临床表现不具有特异性,且差异很大,这使得它比其他(病毒)感染更难鉴别。无论是单个症状还是症状组合都不足以特异性地确诊COVID-19。目标是通过使用一种评分系统,在急诊科早期识别出有患COVID-19疾病风险的患者,以便对他们进行预防性隔离。

方法

基于对2020年3月9日至4月30日德国三个急诊科疑似患有COVID-19的患者进行多中心回顾性评估,并进行后续严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测,开发并实施了一种基于症状的COVID-19评分系统。

结果

研究人群包括697例患者,其中9.4%的患者被诊断为COVID-19感染。COVID-19评分≥5分与患病可能性显著增加相关。该评分系统的敏感性为98.4%,特异性为中等水平,为48.3%。

讨论

该评分系统在初始评估时易于获得,作为风险分层的一部分,有助于评估COVID-19感染的预检概率,并可在早期通过预防性隔离、PCR检测和其他治疗选择影响治疗途径。然而,由于该疾病症状不具有特异性,必须承认高敏感性的目标导致该评分系统的特异性相对较低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/acf7/7645898/46fd1551a3c6/63_2020_754_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/acf7/7645898/911d38185390/63_2020_754_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/acf7/7645898/cfe085b753e7/63_2020_754_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/acf7/7645898/46fd1551a3c6/63_2020_754_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/acf7/7645898/911d38185390/63_2020_754_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/acf7/7645898/cfe085b753e7/63_2020_754_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/acf7/7645898/46fd1551a3c6/63_2020_754_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
[Risk stratification through implementation and evaluation of a COVID-19 score : A retrospective diagnostic study].通过实施和评估COVID-19评分进行风险分层:一项回顾性诊断研究
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2020 Dec;115(Suppl 3):132-138. doi: 10.1007/s00063-020-00754-4. Epub 2020 Nov 6.
2
CCEDRRN COVID-19 Infection Score (CCIS): development and validation in a Canadian cohort of a clinical risk score to predict SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients presenting to the emergency department with suspected COVID-19.CCEDRRN COVID-19 感染评分(CCIS):在加拿大疑似 COVID-19 急诊患者队列中开发和验证用于预测 SARS-CoV-2 感染的临床风险评分。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 2;11(12):e055832. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055832.
3
[Risk stratification of emergencies during the COVID-19 pandemic within the emergency department].[新冠疫情期间急诊科内紧急情况的风险分层]
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2020 Dec;115(Suppl 3):123-131. doi: 10.1007/s00063-020-00748-2. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
4
Controlled, double-blind, randomized trial to assess the efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine chemoprophylaxis in SARS CoV2 infection in healthcare personnel in the hospital setting: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.在医院环境中评估羟氯喹化学预防 SARS-CoV2 感染在医护人员中的疗效和安全性的对照、双盲、随机试验:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Jun 3;21(1):472. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04400-4.
5
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of four different strategies for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in the general population (CoV-Surv Study): a structured summary of a study protocol for a cluster-randomised, two-factorial controlled trial.在普通人群中进行 SARS-CoV-2 监测的四种不同策略的有效性和成本效益(CoV-Surv 研究):一项关于集群随机、双因素对照试验的研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Jan 8;22(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04982-z.
6
Chest CT in the Emergency Department for Diagnosis of COVID-19 Pneumonia: Dutch Experience.急诊科胸部 CT 诊断 COVID-19 肺炎:荷兰经验。
Radiology. 2021 Feb;298(2):E98-E106. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020203465. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
7
Rapid identification of SARS-CoV-2-infected patients at the emergency department using routine testing.在急诊科使用常规检测快速识别 SARS-CoV-2 感染患者。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020 Jun 29;58(9):1587-1593. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2020-0593. Print 2020 Aug 27.
8
[Repetition of microbiological tests in suspect of SARS-CoV-2 infection: utility of a score based on clinical probability].[对疑似SARS-CoV-2感染进行微生物学检测的重复:基于临床概率的评分的效用]
Rev Esp Quimioter. 2020 Dec;33(6):410-414. doi: 10.37201/req/080.2020. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
9
Thoracic imaging tests for the diagnosis of COVID-19.用于诊断新型冠状病毒肺炎的胸部影像学检查
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 30;9:CD013639. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013639.pub2.
10
National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) on admission predicts severe disease and in-hospital mortality from Covid-19 - a prospective cohort study.入院时的国家早期预警评分 2 (NEWS2)可预测新冠病毒疾病的严重程度和住院死亡率-一项前瞻性队列研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2020 Jul 13;28(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s13049-020-00764-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-Benefit of Real-Time Multiplex PCR Testing of SARS-CoV-2 in German Hospitals.德国医院实时多重聚合酶链反应检测 SARS-CoV-2 的成本效益分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 15;20(4):3447. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043447.
2
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
3
A 12-hospital prospective evaluation of a clinical decision support prognostic algorithm based on logistic regression as a form of machine learning to facilitate decision making for patients with suspected COVID-19.

本文引用的文献

1
[Handling of COVID-19 in the emergency department : Field report of the emergency ward of the University Hospital Münster].[明斯特大学医院急诊科对新冠疫情的应对:急诊科实地报告]
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2020 Jun;115(5):380-387. doi: 10.1007/s00063-020-00693-0. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
2
Self-reported Olfactory and Taste Disorders in Patients With Severe Acute Respiratory Coronavirus 2 Infection: A Cross-sectional Study.严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2感染患者的自我报告嗅觉和味觉障碍:一项横断面研究。
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Jul 28;71(15):889-890. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa330.
3
Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China.
一项基于逻辑回归的机器学习临床决策支持预后算法的 12 家医院前瞻性评估,旨在为疑似 COVID-19 患者的决策提供便利。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 5;17(1):e0262193. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262193. eCollection 2022.
《中国 2019 年冠状病毒病临床特征》
N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 30;382(18):1708-1720. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2002032. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
4
Therapeutic and triage strategies for 2019 novel coronavirus disease in fever clinics.发热门诊中2019新型冠状病毒病的治疗与分诊策略
Lancet Respir Med. 2020 Mar;8(3):e11-e12. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30071-0. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
5
Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China.中国武汉地区 2019 年新型冠状病毒感染患者的临床特征。
Lancet. 2020 Feb 15;395(10223):497-506. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5. Epub 2020 Jan 24.