• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

德国医院实时多重聚合酶链反应检测 SARS-CoV-2 的成本效益分析。

Cost-Benefit of Real-Time Multiplex PCR Testing of SARS-CoV-2 in German Hospitals.

机构信息

Institute for Epidemiology, University Medical Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Airway Research Center North (ARCN), 24015 Kiel, Germany.

Lung Clinic Grosshansdorf, Germany, Airway Disease Center North (ARCN), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), 22949 Großhansdorf, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 15;20(4):3447. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043447.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph20043447
PMID:36834141
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9960777/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The current Omicron COVID-19 pandemic has significant morbidity worldwide.

OBJECTIVE

Assess the cost-benefit relation of implementing PCR point-of-care (POCT) COVID-19 testing in the emergency rooms (ERs) of German hospitals and in the case of inpatient admission due to other acute illnesses.

METHODS

A deterministic decision-analytic model simulated the incremental costs of using the Savanna Multiplex RT-PCR test compared to using clinical judgement alone to confirm or exclude COVID-19 in adult patients in German ERs prior to hospitalization or just prior to discharge. Direct and indirect costs were evaluated from the hospital perspective. Nasal or nasopharyngeal swabs of patients suspected to have COVID-19 by clinical judgement, but without POCT, were sent to external labs for RT-PCR testing.

RESULTS

In probabilistic sensitivity analysis, assuming a COVID-19 prevalence ranging between 15.6-41.2% and a hospitalization rate between 4.3-64.3%, implementing the Savanna test saved, on average, €107 as compared to applying the clinical-judgement-only strategy. A revenue loss of €735 can be avoided when SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients coming unplanned to the hospital due to other acute illnesses are excluded immediately by POCT.

CONCLUSIONS

Using highly sensitive and specific PCR-POCT in patients suspected of COVID-19 infection at German ERs may significantly reduce hospital expenditures.

摘要

背景

目前的奥密克戎 COVID-19 大流行在全球范围内造成了很高的发病率。

目的

评估在德国医院急诊室(ER)和因其他急性疾病住院时实施 PCR 即时检测(POCT)COVID-19 检测的成本效益关系。

方法

使用确定性决策分析模型模拟了与仅使用临床判断相比,在德国 ER 中对即将住院或即将出院的成年患者进行 COVID-19 确诊或排除时使用 Savanna 多重 RT-PCR 检测的增量成本。从医院角度评估了直接和间接成本。对临床判断怀疑患有 COVID-19 但未进行 POCT 的患者进行鼻拭子或鼻咽拭子采样,并送到外部实验室进行 RT-PCR 检测。

结果

在概率敏感性分析中,假设 COVID-19 的患病率在 15.6-41.2%之间,住院率在 4.3-64.3%之间,与仅应用临床判断策略相比,实施 Savanna 测试平均可节省 107 欧元。当通过 POCT 立即排除因其他急性疾病而计划外到医院的患者的 SARS-CoV-2 感染时,可避免 735 欧元的收入损失。

结论

在德国 ER 中对疑似 COVID-19 感染的患者使用高度敏感和特异的 PCR-POCT 可能会显著降低医院支出。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7587/9960777/015bfb47a5d4/ijerph-20-03447-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7587/9960777/8ba1178e3118/ijerph-20-03447-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7587/9960777/015bfb47a5d4/ijerph-20-03447-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7587/9960777/8ba1178e3118/ijerph-20-03447-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7587/9960777/015bfb47a5d4/ijerph-20-03447-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Cost-Benefit of Real-Time Multiplex PCR Testing of SARS-CoV-2 in German Hospitals.德国医院实时多重聚合酶链反应检测 SARS-CoV-2 的成本效益分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 15;20(4):3447. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043447.
2
Point-of-care COVID-19 antigen testing in German emergency rooms - a cost-benefit analysis.德国急诊室即时 COVID-19 抗原检测 - 成本效益分析。
Pulmonology. 2022 May-Jun;28(3):164-172. doi: 10.1016/j.pulmoe.2021.06.009. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
3
Rapid Point-of-Care Influenza Testing for Patients in German Emergency Rooms - A Cost-Benefit Analysis.德国急诊室患者的即时快速流感检测——成本效益分析
J Health Econ Outcomes Res. 2019 Dec 26;6(3):203-212. doi: 10.36469/001c.11206. eCollection 2019.
4
Cost-Benefit Analysis of Real-Time Influenza Testing for Patients in German Emergency Rooms.德国急诊室实时流感检测的成本效益分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul 3;16(13):2368. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16132368.
5
Point-of-Care COVID-19 Antigen Testing in Exposed German Healthcare Workers-A Cost Model.暴露于新冠病毒的德国医护人员的即时 COVID-19 抗原检测——成本模型。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 14;18(20):10767. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182010767.
6
Rapid, point-of-care antigen tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.用于 SARS-CoV-2 感染诊断的快速、即时抗原检测。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 22;7(7):CD013705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013705.pub3.
7
Development and Clinical Application of a Rapid and Sensitive Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification Test for SARS-CoV-2 Infection.用于 SARS-CoV-2 感染的快速灵敏环介导等温扩增检测方法的建立与临床应用。
mSphere. 2020 Aug 26;5(4):e00808-20. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00808-20.
8
Single-Center Experience in Detecting Influenza Virus, RSV and SARS-CoV-2 at the Emergency Department.在急诊科检测流感病毒、RSV 和 SARS-CoV-2 的单中心经验。
Viruses. 2023 Feb 8;15(2):470. doi: 10.3390/v15020470.
9
[Diagnostic performance of two antigen-tests compared to one PCR-Test to detect SARS-CoV-2 in an emergency department and emergency service].[在急诊科和急救服务中,将两种抗原检测与一种PCR检测的诊断性能进行比较以检测SARS-CoV-2]
Anaesthesiologie. 2023 Nov;72(11):791-798. doi: 10.1007/s00101-023-01343-8. Epub 2023 Oct 4.
10
A rapid and cost-effective diagnostic algorithm for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the emergency area by combining highly sensitive antigenic test and RT-PCR.一种快速且具有成本效益的诊断算法,通过结合高灵敏度抗原检测和 RT-PCR 检测,在急诊区域检测 SARS-CoV-2 感染。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2022 Aug;103(4):115727. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2022.115727. Epub 2022 May 23.

引用本文的文献

1
The Role and Value of Professional Rapid Testing of Acute Respiratory Infections (ARIs) in Europe: A Special Focus on the Czech Republic, Poland, and Romania.欧洲急性呼吸道感染(ARI)专业快速检测的作用和价值:特别关注捷克共和国、波兰和罗马尼亚
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Mar 16;14(6):631. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14060631.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative analysis of the risks of hospitalisation and death associated with SARS-CoV-2 omicron (B.1.1.529) and delta (B.1.617.2) variants in England: a cohort study.比较分析英国住院和死亡风险与 SARS-CoV-2 奥密克戎(B.1.1.529)和德尔塔(B.1.617.2)变异株的关系:一项队列研究。
Lancet. 2022 Apr 2;399(10332):1303-1312. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00462-7. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
2
The effective reproductive number of the Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 is several times relative to Delta.严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)奥密克戎变异株的有效繁殖数相对于德尔塔变异株而言是其数倍。
J Travel Med. 2022 May 31;29(3). doi: 10.1093/jtm/taac037.
3
[University emergency departments in the corona pandemic-Results from the ReCovER registry].
[新冠疫情期间的大学急诊科——ReCovER登记处的结果]
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2022 Oct;117(7):558-567. doi: 10.1007/s00063-021-00859-4. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
4
The COVID-19 Disease Burden in Germany in 2020—Years of Life Lost to Death and Disease Over the Course of the Pandemic.2020 年德国的 COVID-19 疾病负担——大流行期间因死亡和疾病而损失的预期寿命。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2021 Mar 5;118(9):145-151. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2021.0147.
5
Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in healthcare workers in a large teaching hospital in the North West of England: a period prevalence survey.英格兰西北部一家大型教学医院医护人员中 SARS-CoV-2 感染的血清流行率:一项期间患病率调查。
BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 16;11(3):e045384. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045384.
6
Diagnostic accuracy of symptoms as a diagnostic tool for SARS-CoV 2 infection: a cross-sectional study in a cohort of 2,173 patients.症状作为 SARS-CoV-2 感染诊断工具的诊断准确性:对 2173 例患者队列的横断面研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Mar 11;21(1):255. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-05930-1.
7
A rapid screening classifier for diagnosing COVID-19.用于诊断 COVID-19 的快速筛选分类器。
Int J Biol Sci. 2021 Jan 9;17(2):539-548. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.53982. eCollection 2021.
8
Ruling out COVID-19 by chest CT at emergency admission when prevalence is low: the prospective, observational SCOUT study.低流行期急诊入院时行胸部 CT 排除 COVID-19:前瞻性、观察性 SCOUT 研究。
Respir Res. 2021 Jan 12;22(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12931-020-01611-w.
9
Comparison of the clinical characteristics and outcomes of hospitalized adult COVID-19 and influenza patients - a prospective observational study.比较住院成人 COVID-19 和流感患者的临床特征和结局:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Infect Dis (Lond). 2021 Feb;53(2):111-121. doi: 10.1080/23744235.2020.1840623. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
10
[Risk stratification through implementation and evaluation of a COVID-19 score : A retrospective diagnostic study].通过实施和评估COVID-19评分进行风险分层:一项回顾性诊断研究
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2020 Dec;115(Suppl 3):132-138. doi: 10.1007/s00063-020-00754-4. Epub 2020 Nov 6.