From the Department of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Anatomy (S.S., M.P.), Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, and Radboud Center for Infectious Diseases (C.P.B.R.), Department of Pulmonology (M.H.E.R.), and Department of Medical Microbiology and Radboud Center for Infectious Diseases (J.R.L.), Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein zuid 10, 6525GA Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology (L.F.M.B.), Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine (V.H.), Department of Respiratory Medicine (D.A.K.), and Department of Internal Medicine (L.P.S.), Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Departments of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (H.M.E.Q.v.U., T.v.R.V.) and Pulmonology (C.K.), Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (H.A.G.) and Department of Internal Medicine (P.M.S.), Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Departments of Radiology (J.L.S.), Infectious Diseases (H.S., R.W.), and Pulmonology (F.J.B.), Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands; Department of Global Health, Amsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (V.H.); Departments of Radiology (M.V.) and Internal Medicine (A.S.M.D.), Canisius-Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; and GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht, the Netherlands (H.A.G.).
Radiology. 2021 Feb;298(2):E98-E106. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020203465. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
Background Clinicians need to rapidly and reliably diagnose coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) for proper risk stratification, isolation strategies, and treatment decisions. Purpose To assess the real-life performance of radiologist emergency department chest CT interpretation for diagnosing COVID-19 during the acute phase of the pandemic, using the COVID-19 Reporting and Data System (CO-RADS). Materials and Methods This retrospective multicenter study included consecutive patients who presented to emergency departments in six medical centers between March and April 2020 with moderate to severe upper respiratory symptoms suspicious for COVID-19. As part of clinical practice, chest CT scans were obtained for primary work-up and scored using the five-point CO-RADS scheme for suspicion of COVID-19. CT was compared with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay and a clinical reference standard established by a multidisciplinary group of clinicians based on RT-PCR, COVID-19 contact history, oxygen therapy, timing of RT-PCR testing, and likely alternative diagnosis. Performance of CT was estimated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) analysis and diagnostic odds ratios against both reference standards. Subgroup analysis was performed on the basis of symptom duration grouped presentations of less than 48 hours, 48 hours through 7 days, and more than 7 days. Results A total of 1070 patients (median age, 66 years; interquartile range, 54-75 years; 626 men) were included, of whom 536 (50%) had a positive RT-PCR result and 137 (13%) of whom were considered to have a possible or probable COVID-19 diagnosis based on the clinical reference standard. Chest CT yielded an AUC of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.84, 0.89) compared with RT-PCR and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.85, 0.89) compared with the clinical reference standard. A CO-RADS score of 4 or greater yielded an odds ratio of 25.9 (95% CI: 18.7, 35.9) for a COVID-19 diagnosis with RT-PCR and an odds ratio of 30.6 (95% CI: 21.1, 44.4) with the clinical reference standard. For symptom duration of less than 48 hours, the AUC fell to 0.71 (95% CI: 0.62, 0.80; < .001). Conclusion Chest CT analysis using the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Reporting and Data System enables rapid and reliable diagnosis of COVID-19, particularly when symptom duration is greater than 48 hours. © RSNA, 2020 See also the editorial by Elicker in this issue.
背景 临床医生需要快速可靠地诊断 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19),以便进行适当的风险分层、隔离策略和治疗决策。目的 利用 COVID-19 报告和数据系统(CO-RADS)评估放射科医生在大流行急性期进行急诊胸部 CT 解读以诊断 COVID-19 的实际表现。材料与方法 本回顾性多中心研究纳入了 2020 年 3 月至 4 月期间在六家医疗中心因疑似 COVID-19 的中度至重度上呼吸道症状就诊的连续患者。作为临床实践的一部分,对胸部 CT 扫描进行了初步检查,并使用 CO-RADS 五分制方案对 COVID-19 可疑性进行了评分。将 CT 与严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)检测进行比较,并根据 RT-PCR、COVID-19 接触史、氧疗、RT-PCR 检测时间以及可能的替代诊断,由一组多学科临床医生建立临床参考标准。使用接受者操作特征曲线(ROC)下面积(AUC)分析和诊断比值比(DOR)来评估 CT 对两个参考标准的性能。根据症状持续时间对患者进行亚组分析,分组为<48 小时、48 小时至 7 天和>7 天。结果 共纳入 1070 例患者(中位年龄为 66 岁;四分位间距为 54-75 岁;626 例男性),其中 536 例(50%)RT-PCR 检测结果为阳性,137 例(13%)根据临床参考标准被认为可能或很可能患有 COVID-19。胸部 CT 与 RT-PCR 相比 AUC 为 0.87(95%CI:0.84,0.89),与临床参考标准相比 AUC 为 0.87(95%CI:0.85,0.89)。CO-RADS 评分≥4 分与 RT-PCR 相比,COVID-19 诊断的优势比为 25.9(95%CI:18.7,35.9),与临床参考标准相比,优势比为 30.6(95%CI:21.1,44.4)。对于症状持续时间<48 小时,AUC 降至 0.71(95%CI:0.62,0.80;<.001)。结论 使用 COVID-19 报告和数据系统(CO-RADS)进行胸部 CT 分析可快速可靠地诊断 COVID-19,尤其是当症状持续时间超过 48 小时时。©RSNA,2020 另见本期 Elicker 编辑评论。