• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序:技术巴别塔与国际大流行控制的差距。

COVID-19 Contact Tracing Apps: A Technologic Tower of Babel and the Gap for International Pandemic Control.

机构信息

Faculty of Law, University of Macau, Macau, SAR, China.

Faculty of Law, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.

出版信息

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Nov 27;8(11):e23194. doi: 10.2196/23194.

DOI:10.2196/23194
PMID:33156804
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7704120/
Abstract

As the world struggles with the new COVID-19 pandemic, contact tracing apps of various types have been adopted in many jurisdictions for combating the spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. However, even if they are successful in containing the virus within national borders, these apps are becoming ineffective as international travel is gradually resumed. The problem rests in the plurality of apps and their inability to operate in a synchronized manner, as well as the absence of an international entity with the power to coordinate and analyze the information collected by the disparate apps. The risk of creating a useless Tower of Babel of COVID-19 contact tracing apps is very real, endangering global health. This paper analyzes legal barriers for realizing the interoperability of contact tracing apps and emphasizes the need for developing coordinated solutions to promote safe international travel and global pandemic control.

摘要

随着世界应对新的 COVID-19 大流行,许多司法管辖区都采用了各种类型的接触者追踪应用程序来控制 SARS-CoV-2 病毒的传播。然而,即使这些应用程序在国内成功控制了病毒,随着国际旅行的逐渐恢复,它们也变得不再有效。问题在于应用程序的多样性及其无法同步运作,以及缺乏一个具有协调和分析不同应用程序收集信息的权力的国际实体。创建一个无用的 COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序的巴别塔的风险是非常现实的,这将危及全球健康。本文分析了实现接触者追踪应用程序互操作性的法律障碍,并强调需要制定协调的解决方案,以促进安全的国际旅行和全球大流行控制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b35b/7704120/514848cc96b1/mhealth_v8i11e23194_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b35b/7704120/514848cc96b1/mhealth_v8i11e23194_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b35b/7704120/514848cc96b1/mhealth_v8i11e23194_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
COVID-19 Contact Tracing Apps: A Technologic Tower of Babel and the Gap for International Pandemic Control.COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序:技术巴别塔与国际大流行控制的差距。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Nov 27;8(11):e23194. doi: 10.2196/23194.
2
And Justice for All? There Is More to the Interoperability of Contact Tracing Apps Than Legal Barriers. Comment on "COVID-19 Contact Tracing Apps: A Technologic Tower of Babel and the Gap for International Pandemic Control".《人人都能实现正义?接触者追踪应用程序的互操作性不仅仅存在法律障碍。评〈新冠疫情接触者追踪应用程序:一座技术巴别塔与国际疫情防控差距〉》
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 May 26;9(5):e26218. doi: 10.2196/26218.
3
Authors' Reply to: And Justice for All? There Is More to the Interoperability of Contact Tracing Apps Than Legal Barriers. Comment on "COVID-19 Contact Tracing Apps: A Technologic Tower of Babel and the Gap for International Pandemic Control".作者对《人人平等?接触者追踪应用程序的互操作性不仅仅存在法律障碍》的回复。对《COVID-19接触者追踪应用程序:一座技术巴别塔以及国际疫情防控的差距》的评论
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 May 26;9(5):e26630. doi: 10.2196/26630.
4
Technology, Privacy, and User Opinions of COVID-19 Mobile Apps for Contact Tracing: Systematic Search and Content Analysis.技术、隐私和用户对 COVID-19 移动接触追踪应用程序的看法:系统搜索和内容分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 9;23(2):e23467. doi: 10.2196/23467.
5
COVID-19 Contact-Tracing Apps: Analysis of the Readability of Privacy Policies.新冠病毒病接触者追踪应用程序:隐私政策可读性分析
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Dec 3;22(12):e21572. doi: 10.2196/21572.
6
Predicting Public Uptake of Digital Contact Tracing During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Results From a Nationwide Survey in Singapore.预测新冠疫情期间数字接触者追踪技术在公众中的应用情况:新加坡全国性调查结果
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 3;23(2):e24730. doi: 10.2196/24730.
7
Analyzing the Essential Attributes of Nationally Issued COVID-19 Contact Tracing Apps: Open-Source Intelligence Approach and Content Analysis.分析国家发布的新冠病毒接触者追踪应用程序的基本属性:开源情报方法与内容分析
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Mar 26;9(3):e27232. doi: 10.2196/27232.
8
Inherent privacy limitations of decentralized contact tracing apps.去中心化接触者追踪应用程序固有的隐私限制。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Jan 15;28(1):193-195. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa153.
9
The Roles of General Health and COVID-19 Proximity in Contact Tracing App Usage: Cross-sectional Survey Study.一般健康状况和与 COVID-19 的接近程度在接触者追踪应用程序使用中的作用:横断面调查研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Aug 18;7(8):e27892. doi: 10.2196/27892.
10
Contact-tracing apps help reduce COVID infections, data suggest.数据显示,接触者追踪应用程序有助于减少新冠病毒感染。
Nature. 2021 Mar;591(7848):18-19. doi: 10.1038/d41586-021-00451-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Uptake and Utilization of the COVID-19 Alert App within a University Community in New York.纽约一所大学社区内新冠病毒警报应用程序的使用与利用情况
Innov Pharm. 2023 Nov 9;14(3). doi: 10.24926/iip.v14i3.5488. eCollection 2023.
2
Evaluating the Added Value of Digital Contact Tracing Support Tools for Citizens: Framework Development.评估面向公民的数字接触者追踪支持工具的附加价值:框架开发
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Nov 29;12:e44728. doi: 10.2196/44728.
3
A Survey on harnessing the Applications of Mobile Computing in Healthcare during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Challenges and Solutions.

本文引用的文献

1
Observational study of UK mobile health apps for COVID-19.英国用于新冠肺炎的移动健康应用程序的观察性研究。
Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Aug;2(8):e388-e390. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30144-8. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
2
COVID-19 contact tracing apps: a stress test for privacy, the GDPR, and data protection regimes.新冠疫情接触者追踪应用程序:对隐私、《通用数据保护条例》及数据保护制度的压力测试
J Law Biosci. 2020 May 28;7(1):lsaa034. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsaa034. eCollection 2020 Jan-Jun.
3
Mobile phone data for informing public health actions across the COVID-19 pandemic life cycle.
新冠疫情期间利用移动计算在医疗保健领域应用的调查:挑战与解决方案
Comput Netw. 2023 Apr;224:109605. doi: 10.1016/j.comnet.2023.109605. Epub 2023 Feb 3.
4
Effectiveness, Policy, and User Acceptance of COVID-19 Contact-Tracing Apps in the Post-COVID-19 Pandemic Era: Experience and Comparative Study.新冠疫情后时代的 COVID-19 接触者追踪应用的效果、政策和用户接受度:经验与比较研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022 Oct 27;8(10):e40233. doi: 10.2196/40233.
5
Understanding Trust and Changes in Use After a Year With the NHS COVID-19 Contact Tracing App in the United Kingdom: Longitudinal Mixed Methods Study.理解信任和在英国使用 NHS COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序一年后的变化:纵向混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Oct 14;24(10):e40558. doi: 10.2196/40558.
6
Modeling Trust in COVID-19 Contact-Tracing Apps Using the Human-Computer Trust Scale: Online Survey Study.使用人机信任量表对新冠疫情接触者追踪应用程序中的信任进行建模:在线调查研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Jun 13;9(2):e33951. doi: 10.2196/33951.
7
Using postal change-of-address data to predict second waves in infections near pandemic epicentres.利用邮政地址变更数据预测大流行中心附近感染的第二波高峰。
Epidemiol Infect. 2022 Mar 24;150:e120. doi: 10.1017/S0950268822000486.
8
Identifying and addressing digital health risks associated with emergency pandemic response: Problem identification, scoping review, and directions toward evidence-based evaluation.识别和应对紧急大流行病应对相关的数字健康风险:问题识别、范围界定综述,以及朝着基于证据的评估的方向。
Int J Med Inform. 2022 Jan;157:104639. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104639. Epub 2021 Nov 6.
9
Mobile Apps Leveraged in the COVID-19 Pandemic in East and South-East Asia: Review and Content Analysis.移动应用程序在东亚和东南亚 COVID-19 大流行中的应用:综述和内容分析。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Nov 11;9(11):e32093. doi: 10.2196/32093.
10
Post-COVID Public Health Surveillance and Privacy Expectations in the United States: Scenario-Based Interview Study.美国新冠疫情后公共卫生监测与隐私预期:基于情景的访谈研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Oct 5;9(10):e30871. doi: 10.2196/30871.
用于在新冠疫情生命周期内为公共卫生行动提供信息的手机数据。
Sci Adv. 2020 Jun 5;6(23):eabc0764. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abc0764. eCollection 2020 Jun.
4
Active case finding with case management: the key to tackling the COVID-19 pandemic.主动病例发现与病例管理:应对 COVID-19 大流行的关键。
Lancet. 2020 Jul 4;396(10243):63-70. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31278-2. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
5
Quantifying SARS-CoV-2 transmission suggests epidemic control with digital contact tracing.量化 SARS-CoV-2 传播表明数字接触者追踪可控制疫情。
Science. 2020 May 8;368(6491). doi: 10.1126/science.abb6936. Epub 2020 Mar 31.
6
COVID-19 control in China during mass population movements at New Year.新年期间中国大规模人口流动情况下的新冠疫情防控
Lancet. 2020 Mar 7;395(10226):764-766. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30421-9. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
7
California Takes the Lead on Data Privacy Law.加州在数据隐私法方面走在前列。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2019 Sep;49(5):4-5. doi: 10.1002/hast.1042.
8
Global citizenship is key to securing global health: the role of higher education.全球公民意识是保障全球健康的关键:高等教育的作用。
Prev Med. 2014 Jul;64:126-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.05.006. Epub 2014 May 13.