Division of Cardiac Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass; Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Mass.
Division of Cardiac Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Aug;164(2):573-580.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.09.102. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
This study aimed to understand the population-level treatment modalities and to evaluate the survival benefits of surgical resection in primary cardiac lymphoma.
We queried the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program database, which covers 35% of the US population. Patients with a histologic diagnosis of primary cardiac lymphoma from 1973 to 2015 were included. Multivariable accelerated failure time regression was performed to evaluate the associations between clinical factors and overall survival.
A total of 184 patients were identified. The median age was 68 years, 80% were White, and 46% were women. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (80%) was the most common histology, and the majority (65%) was low-stage lymphoma (Ann Arbor stage I or II). Median survival was 2.2 years. Seventy-three percent of patients received chemotherapy. Only 10% of patients received local resection or debulking. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that local resection or debulking was not independently associated with overall survival (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.30-1.48; P = .32). Instead, chemotherapy (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.4; 95% confidence interval, 0.23-0.69; P < .001) was independently associated with improved survival, whereas increasing age (adjusted hazard ratio of 5-year increment, 1.13; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.22; P <.001) and advanced stage (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.18; 95% confidence interval, 1.33-3.56; P < .001) were independently associated with worse survival.
Surgical resection was not independently associated with survival in patients with primary cardiac lymphoma. Chemotherapy was the predominant treatment option and associated with improved survival, whereas increasing age and advanced stage were independently associated with worse outcomes.
本研究旨在了解人群中的治疗方式,并评估原发性心脏淋巴瘤行手术切除的生存获益。
我们查询了监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库,该数据库涵盖了美国 35%的人口。纳入 1973 年至 2015 年间经组织学诊断为原发性心脏淋巴瘤的患者。采用多变量加速失效时间回归评估临床因素与总生存之间的关联。
共纳入 184 例患者。中位年龄为 68 岁,80%为白人,46%为女性。弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤(80%)是最常见的组织学类型,大多数(65%)为低分期淋巴瘤(Ann Arbor 分期 I 或 II 期)。中位生存时间为 2.2 年。73%的患者接受化疗。仅 10%的患者接受局部切除术或肿瘤切除术。多变量分析表明,局部切除术或肿瘤切除术与总生存无关(调整后的危险比为 0.67;95%置信区间,0.30-1.48;P=0.32)。相反,化疗(调整后的危险比为 0.4;95%置信区间,0.23-0.69;P<0.001)与生存改善独立相关,而年龄增加(调整后的 5 年增量危险比为 1.13;95%置信区间,1.04-1.22;P<0.001)和晚期(调整后的危险比为 2.18;95%置信区间,1.33-3.56;P<0.001)与生存恶化独立相关。
手术切除与原发性心脏淋巴瘤患者的生存无关。化疗是主要的治疗选择,与生存改善相关,而年龄增加和晚期与较差的结局独立相关。