Denham B S, Linke C A, Fridd C W
Transplant Proc. 1977 Sep;9(3):1553-6.
A comparison of the effectiveness of two renal preservation techniques was studied in 30 cannine renal pairs. In the absence of warm ischemia, 24-hr preservation by pulsatile perfusion was not significantly superior to hypothermic storage. When 15 min of warm ischemia was added as an additional insult, pulsatile perfusion afforded significantly better early function than cold storage. Combinations of pulsatile perfusion and hypothermic storage following 15 min of warm ischemia were superior to hypothermic storage alone, but inferior to pulsatile perfusion. Kidneys initially perfused for 6 hr and then cold-stored functioned slightly better than kidneys perfused for 18 hr after initial cold storage.
在30对犬肾中研究了两种肾脏保存技术的有效性比较。在没有热缺血的情况下，搏动灌注24小时的保存效果并不显著优于低温储存。当增加15分钟热缺血作为额外损伤时，搏动灌注的早期功能明显优于冷藏。热缺血15分钟后搏动灌注与低温储存相结合优于单独低温储存，但不如搏动灌注。最初灌注6小时然后冷藏的肾脏比最初冷藏后灌注18小时的肾脏功能稍好。
