• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

贸易开放度对农业技术投入与碳排放关系的影响:基于面板门限模型的证据。

The effect of trade openness on the relationship between agricultural technology inputs and carbon emissions: evidence from a panel threshold model.

机构信息

School of Economics, Chongqing Technology and Business University, Chongqing, 400067, China.

Department of Actuarial Studies & Business Analytics, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Feb;28(8):9991-10004. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-11255-4. Epub 2020 Nov 7.

DOI:10.1007/s11356-020-11255-4
PMID:33159229
Abstract

The development of low-carbon agriculture systems has been a global consensus to reduce carbon emissions in the agricultural sector for addressing climate change challenges. This fact brings the need to study the agricultural carbon emissions (ACEs). Studies focusing on calculating the spatiotemporal changes of ACEs and analyzing the main factors for ACE changes have been conducted. The agricultural technology inputs (ATIs) as an important factor to influence ACEs have been identified. The traditional linear model was the commonly used method to study the relationship between ATIs and ACEs, whereas the impact of ATIs on ACEs in different areas might be complex and nonlinear due to the differences in trade openness causing different development levels of agricultural technologies. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the effect of trade openness on the relationship between ATIs and ACEs using a panel threshold model and put forward policy implications for the low-carbon agriculture development. The analysis was based on data from a panel of 31 provinces of China during 2003-2018. The results show that ATIs and ACEs increased from 2003 to 2018 and the spatial distribution of ATIs was similar to that of ACEs. The ATIs had a positive effect on ACEs with a significant single-threshold effect from trade openness. When the trade openness was below the threshold (0.1425), the positive effect of ATIs on ACEs was significant (coefficient, 0.117), whereas, when the trade openness was above the threshold (0.1425), the positive effect of ATIs on ACEs significantly decreased (coefficient, 0.062). Furthermore, industrial structure and agricultural economic development were the positive drivers of ACEs, while trade openness, education level of rural workers, R&D funding, and natural disasters had negative relationships with ACEs. The results provide valuable references for understanding ACE drivers and developing low-carbon agriculture with the consideration of ATIs and trade openness.

摘要

低碳农业系统的发展已成为全球共识,旨在减少农业部门的碳排放,以应对气候变化挑战。这一事实使得研究农业碳排放(ACEs)成为必要。目前已经有研究侧重于计算 ACEs 的时空变化,并分析 ACE 变化的主要因素。农业技术投入(ATIs)作为影响 ACEs 的重要因素已被确定。传统的线性模型是研究 ATIs 与 ACEs 之间关系的常用方法,但由于贸易开放度的差异导致农业技术发展水平不同,ATIs 对 ACEs 的影响可能是复杂和非线性的。因此,本研究旨在利用面板门槛模型研究贸易开放度对 ATIs 与 ACEs 关系的影响,并为低碳农业发展提出政策建议。本研究基于 2003-2018 年中国 31 个省份的面板数据进行分析。结果表明,ATIs 和 ACEs 从 2003 年到 2018 年都有所增加,并且 ATIs 的空间分布与 ACEs 的空间分布相似。ATIs 对 ACEs 有正向影响,贸易开放度具有显著的单门槛效应。当贸易开放度低于门槛值(0.1425)时,ATIs 对 ACEs 的正向影响显著(系数为 0.117),而当贸易开放度高于门槛值(0.1425)时,ATIs 对 ACEs 的正向影响显著降低(系数为 0.062)。此外,产业结构和农业经济发展是 ACEs 的正向驱动因素,而贸易开放度、农村工人教育水平、研发资金和自然灾害与 ACEs 呈负相关关系。研究结果为理解 ACEs 的驱动因素以及在考虑 ATIs 和贸易开放度的情况下发展低碳农业提供了有价值的参考。

相似文献

1
The effect of trade openness on the relationship between agricultural technology inputs and carbon emissions: evidence from a panel threshold model.贸易开放度对农业技术投入与碳排放关系的影响:基于面板门限模型的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Feb;28(8):9991-10004. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-11255-4. Epub 2020 Nov 7.
2
The nonlinear effect of population aging on carbon emission-Empirical analysis of ten selected provinces in China.人口老龄化对碳排放的非线性影响-中国十个选定省份的实证分析。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Oct 20;740:140057. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140057. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
3
Study on the Spatiotemporal Evolution and Influencing Factors of Agricultural Carbon Emissions in the Counties of Zhejiang Province.浙江省县域农业碳排放时空演变及其影响因素研究
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 23;20(1):189. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010189.
4
Effect of agricultural carbon emissions on farmers' health expenditure of China: evidence from the educational threshold effect.农业碳排放对中国农民健康支出的影响:来自教育门槛效应的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Oct;30(46):102586-102603. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-29559-6. Epub 2023 Sep 5.
5
Spatial and Temporal Characteristics and Drivers of Agricultural Carbon Emissions in Jiangsu Province, China.江苏省农业碳排放的时空特征及驱动因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 30;19(19):12463. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912463.
6
Does digital technology innovation promote low-carbon development in agriculture?: A spatial econometric analysis based on 31 provinces in China.数字技术创新是否促进了农业的低碳发展?——基于中国 31 个省的空间计量分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Jan;31(3):4478-4499. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-31369-9. Epub 2023 Dec 16.
7
Reducing agricultural nitrous oxide emissions in China: the role of food production, forest cover, income, trade openness, and rural population.减少中国农业一氧化二氮排放:粮食生产、森林覆盖、收入、贸易开放度和农村人口的作用。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Sep;30(42):95773-95788. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-28990-z. Epub 2023 Aug 9.
8
How does agricultural industrial structure upgrading affect agricultural carbon emissions? Threshold effects analysis for China.农业产业结构升级如何影响农业碳排放?基于中国的门槛效应分析
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Apr;30(18):52943-52957. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-25996-5. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
9
The nonlinear effect of land freight structure on carbon emission intensity: new evidence from road and rail freight in China.陆路货运结构对碳排放强度的非线性影响:来自中国道路和铁路货运的新证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Nov;29(52):78666-78682. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-21352-1. Epub 2022 Jun 13.
10
Assessing the impact of trade openness on CO emissions: Evidence from China-Japan-ROK FTA countries.评估贸易开放度对二氧化碳排放的影响:来自中国-日本-韩国自由贸易协定国家的证据。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Oct 15;296:113241. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113241. Epub 2021 Jul 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Research on coordination mechanism between agricultural green and land ecosystem in Yellow River Basin.黄河流域农业绿色与土地生态系统协调机制研究
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 14;15(1):1934. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-84424-x.
2
Analysis of regional differences and spatial spillover effects of agricultural carbon emissions in China.中国农业碳排放的区域差异及空间溢出效应分析
Heliyon. 2023 May 28;9(6):e16752. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16752. eCollection 2023 Jun.
3
The Impact Mechanism and Spillover Effect of Digital Rural Construction on the Efficiency of Green Transformation for Cultivated Land Use in China.
数字乡村建设对中国耕地利用绿色转型效率的影响机制与溢出效应。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 2;19(23):16159. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192316159.