100 Dairy Road, Department of Sociology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, 99164-4020, USA.
Center for People, Politics and Markets, Goucher College, Baltimore, MD, 21204, USA.
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Nov;265:113491. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113491. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
After decades of ignoring head injury in youth sports, U.S. states passed youth concussion legislation with stipulations about when athletes can return to play. Why were some states slower to pass laws than others? We consider this question through the lens of institutional medicalization, where medically informed policies are enacted. Our study recognizes the uneven nature of policy enactment across time and space with event history methods. We explore the influence of high school sport participation and other variables on the timing of legislation in all fifty states, 2007-2014. States with more high school football participation, as well as states with a strong college football presence, passed concussion laws later. Conversely, states with stronger orientations toward gender egalitarianism adopted laws sooner. These factors reflect sources of receptivity and resistance that underlie the process of institutional medicalization. Our approach offers one of the few quantitative studies of institutional medicalization and provides a template for future quantitative research in this area.
经过几十年对青少年运动中头部受伤问题的忽视,美国各州通过了青少年脑震荡立法,规定了运动员何时可以重返赛场。为什么有些州比其他州更慢地通过法律?我们通过机构医学化的视角来考虑这个问题,在这个视角下,有医学依据的政策得以实施。我们的研究通过事件历史方法认识到政策在时间和空间上的不平衡性。我们探讨了在 2007 年至 2014 年期间,高中体育参与度和其他变量对所有 50 个州立法时间的影响。参与高中橄榄球运动较多的州,以及拥有强大大学橄榄球运动的州,通过脑震荡法的时间较晚。相反,性别平等意识较强的州则更早地通过了相关法律。这些因素反映了机构医学化过程中的接受和抵制的根源。我们的方法提供了机构医学化的少数定量研究之一,并为该领域的未来定量研究提供了模板。