• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用移动应用程序评级量表(MARS)对用于 COVID-19 管理的国家应用程序进行的回顾和内容分析。

A review and content analysis of national apps for COVID-19 management using Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS).

机构信息

Medical Informatics Research Center, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences , Kerman, Iran.

Department of Health Information Management, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences , Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Inform Health Soc Care. 2021 Mar 2;46(1):42-55. doi: 10.1080/17538157.2020.1837838. Epub 2020 Nov 9.

DOI:10.1080/17538157.2020.1837838
PMID:33164594
Abstract

The expansion of mobile health apps for the management of COVID-19 grew exponentially in recent months. However, no study has evaluated these apps. The objective of this study was to develop a reliable measure and rate the quality of COVID-19 mobile health apps, to eventually provide a roadmap for future mHealth app development. In this study, we used COVID-related keywords to identify apps for iOS and Android devices. 13 apps (13.5% of the total number of apps identified) were selected for evaluation. App quality was assessed independently using MARS by two reviewers. Search queries yielded a total of 97 potentially relevant apps, of which 13 met our final inclusion criteria. Kendall's coefficient of concordance value for the inter-rater agreement was 0.93 ( = .03). COVID-19 GOV PK app had the highest average MARS score (4.7/5), and all of the apps had acceptable MARS scores (> 3.0). This study suggests that most COVID-related apps meet acceptable criteria for quality, content, or functionality, and they must highlight esthetic and interesting features for overall quality improvement to be welcomed by users.

摘要

近几个月来,用于管理 COVID-19 的移动医疗应用程序呈指数级增长。然而,尚无研究对这些应用程序进行评估。本研究旨在开发一种可靠的方法来评估 COVID-19 移动健康应用程序的质量,并最终为未来的移动医疗应用程序开发提供路线图。在本研究中,我们使用与 COVID 相关的关键词来识别 iOS 和 Android 设备上的应用程序。选择了 13 个应用程序(占确定的应用程序总数的 13.5%)进行评估。两名评审员使用 MARS 独立评估应用程序的质量。搜索查询共产生了 97 个潜在相关应用程序,其中 13 个符合我们的最终纳入标准。两位评审员之间的肯德尔协调系数一致性值为 0.93(= 0.03)。COVID-19 GOV PK 应用程序的 MARS 平均得分最高(4.7/5),所有应用程序的 MARS 得分均在可接受范围(>3.0)。本研究表明,大多数与 COVID 相关的应用程序在质量、内容或功能方面都符合可接受的标准,它们必须突出美观和有趣的功能,以提高整体质量,从而受到用户的欢迎。

相似文献

1
A review and content analysis of national apps for COVID-19 management using Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS).使用移动应用程序评级量表(MARS)对用于 COVID-19 管理的国家应用程序进行的回顾和内容分析。
Inform Health Soc Care. 2021 Mar 2;46(1):42-55. doi: 10.1080/17538157.2020.1837838. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
2
Analysis of Apps With a Medication List Functionality for Older Adults With Heart Failure Using the Mobile App Rating Scale and the IMS Institute for Healthcare Informatics Functionality Score: Evaluation Study.使用移动应用程序评级量表和 IMS 研究所医疗保健信息学功能评分对心力衰竭老年患者的带药物清单功能的应用程序进行分析:评估研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Nov 2;9(11):e30674. doi: 10.2196/30674.
3
Development and validation of the Italian version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale and its generalisability to apps targeting primary prevention.意大利语版移动应用程序评分量表的开发与验证及其对初级预防应用程序的通用性
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016 Jul 7;16:83. doi: 10.1186/s12911-016-0323-2.
4
German Mobile Apps in Rheumatology: Review and Analysis Using the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS).德国风湿病学移动应用程序:使用移动应用程序评级量表(MARS)进行的评估与分析。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Aug 5;7(8):e14991. doi: 10.2196/14991.
5
Mobile Health Apps on COVID-19 Launched in the Early Days of the Pandemic: Content Analysis and Review.大流行早期推出的 COVID-19 移动健康应用程序:内容分析和综述。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Sep 16;8(9):e19796. doi: 10.2196/19796.
6
Quality and Accessibility of Home Assessment mHealth Apps for Community Living: Systematic Review.家庭评估移动医疗应用程序在社区生活中的质量和可及性:系统评价。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024 Mar 11;12:e52996. doi: 10.2196/52996.
7
Mobile health applications for epilepsy in Indian app stores: A systematic review and content analysis using the mobile app rating scale.印度应用商店中用于癫痫的移动健康应用程序:使用移动应用评分量表的系统评价和内容分析
Epilepsy Res. 2024 Mar;201:107331. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107331. Epub 2024 Feb 22.
8
A Systematic Review of Smartphone Applications Available for Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID19) and the Assessment of their Quality Using the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS).用于 2019 年冠状病毒病 (COVID19) 的智能手机应用程序的系统评价及使用移动应用程序评级量表 (MARS) 对其质量的评估。
J Med Syst. 2020 Aug 10;44(9):164. doi: 10.1007/s10916-020-01633-3.
9
Mobile Phone Apps for Food Allergies or Intolerances in App Stores: Systematic Search and Quality Assessment Using the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS).应用商店中针对食物过敏或不耐受的手机应用程序:使用移动应用评级量表(MARS)进行系统搜索和质量评估。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Sep 16;8(9):e18339. doi: 10.2196/18339.
10
Mobile Apps for Drug-Drug Interaction Checks in Chinese App Stores: Systematic Review and Content Analysis.中文应用商店中用于药物-药物相互作用检查的移动应用程序:系统评价和内容分析。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Jun 15;9(6):e26262. doi: 10.2196/26262.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and Usability Evaluation of COVID-Iran: A Mobile Application for Mitigating COVID-19 Misinformation.“COVID-伊朗”的开发与可用性评估:一款用于缓解新冠疫情错误信息的移动应用程序
Healthc Inform Res. 2024 Oct;30(4):312-323. doi: 10.4258/hir.2024.30.4.312. Epub 2024 Oct 31.
2
Quality Assessment of Smartphone Medication Management Apps in France: Systematic Search.法国智能手机药物管理应用程序的质量评估:系统检索。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024 Mar 18;12:e54866. doi: 10.2196/54866.
3
Mobile Apps for COVID-19: A Systematic Review of Reviews.
用于 COVID-19 的移动应用程序:综述的系统评价
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jan 8;12(2):139. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12020139.
4
Mobile applications in the Philippines during the COVID-19 pandemic: systematic search, use case mapping, and quality assessment using the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS).新冠疫情期间菲律宾的移动应用程序:使用移动应用程序评分量表(MARS)进行系统检索、用例映射和质量评估
BMC Digit Health. 2023;1(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s44247-023-00007-2. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
5
Evaluation of overweight control applications with cognitive-behavioral therapy approach: A systematic review.采用认知行为疗法评估超重控制应用程序:一项系统评价。
Health Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 27;6(3):e1157. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1157. eCollection 2023 Mar.
6
Understanding Post-Adoption Behavioral Intentions of Mobile Health Service Users: An Empirical Study during COVID-19.理解移动医疗服务用户的采用后行为意向:COVID-19 期间的实证研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 22;20(5):3907. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20053907.
7
Mobile Health Apps for Breast Cancer: Content Analysis and Quality Assessment.移动医疗应用程序在乳腺癌中的应用:内容分析与质量评估。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023 Feb 23;11:e43522. doi: 10.2196/43522.
8
Exploring the scope and utility of digital proximity tracing in the effective containment of COVID-19 infection: A narrative review.探索数字近距离追踪在有效遏制新冠病毒感染中的范围和效用:一项叙述性综述。
Germs. 2022 Jun 30;12(2):276-282. doi: 10.18683/germs.2022.1329. eCollection 2022 Jun.
9
Supervised Machine Learning Approach to COVID-19 Detection Based on Clinical Data.基于临床数据的新冠肺炎检测的监督式机器学习方法
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2022 Sep 24;36:110. doi: 10.47176/mjiri.36.110. eCollection 2022.
10
Insights from Review and Content Analysis of Current COVID-19 Mobile Apps and Recommendations for Future Pandemics.对当前 COVID-19 移动应用程序的回顾和内容分析的见解及对未来大流行的建议。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 8;19(22):14652. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192214652.