• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社交网络在登革热、H1N1 和寨卡疫情中的应用:综合文献回顾。

Social networks applied to Dengue, H1N1, and Zika epidemics: An integrative literature review.

机构信息

Fundação Oswaldo Cruz FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.

Programa de Pós Graduação em Informática, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro PPGI/UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

出版信息

Work. 2020;67(3):721-732. doi: 10.3233/WOR-203321.

DOI:10.3233/WOR-203321
PMID:33164977
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Health crises occur both regionally and globally. Online social networks are widely used technical resources that allow users to share large amounts of information with increasing reach and velocity. Thus, the capacity of spreading information about epidemics through social media allows members of a population and health professionals or agencies to collaborate.

METHOD

This study presents results obtained in an integrative review, including examples of how social media enabled collaboration in health surveillance to treat the epidemies of Dengue, Zika, and H1N1. The literature review covers studies published between 2009 and 2017.

RESULTS

The studies reviewed indicate that social media interactions are tools for the rapid dissemination of information. These networks operate at low cost and allow information to reach audiences in need of information and who otherwise would not receive it. Social media allowed researchers to monitor evolving epidemics and obtain epidemiological data useful for decision-making in health surveillance.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the widespread use of social networks, there are opportunities for improvement, especially in technology for treatment.

摘要

背景

健康危机在区域和全球范围内都时有发生。在线社交网络是广泛使用的技术资源,允许用户以越来越高的速度和范围分享大量信息。因此,通过社交媒体传播有关传染病的信息的能力使人群成员和卫生专业人员或机构能够进行协作。

方法

本研究介绍了综合审查的结果,包括社交媒体如何支持登革热、寨卡和 H1N1 等传染病监测中的协作的示例。文献综述涵盖了 2009 年至 2017 年期间发表的研究。

结果

所审查的研究表明,社交媒体互动是快速传播信息的工具。这些网络的运营成本低廉,允许信息传播到需要信息的受众,否则他们将无法获得这些信息。社交媒体使研究人员能够监测不断演变的传染病,并获得有助于传染病监测决策的流行病学数据。

结论

尽管社交网络得到了广泛的应用,但仍有改进的机会,特别是在治疗技术方面。

相似文献

1
Social networks applied to Dengue, H1N1, and Zika epidemics: An integrative literature review.社交网络在登革热、H1N1 和寨卡疫情中的应用:综合文献回顾。
Work. 2020;67(3):721-732. doi: 10.3233/WOR-203321.
2
Arbovirus Diagnostics: From Bad to Worse due to Expanding Dengue Virus Vaccination and Zika Virus Epidemics.虫媒病毒诊断:因登革热病毒疫苗接种范围扩大和寨卡病毒流行而每况愈下
Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Apr 3;66(8):1181-1183. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix972.
3
Changes in the dynamics of dengue incidence in South and Central America are possibly due to cross-population immunity after Zika virus epidemics.南美洲和中美洲登革热发病率动态的变化可能是由于寨卡病毒流行后人群交叉免疫所致。
Trop Med Int Health. 2021 Mar;26(3):272-280. doi: 10.1111/tmi.13526. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
4
Impact of concurrent epidemics of dengue, chikungunya, zika, and COVID-19.登革热、基孔肯雅热、寨卡和 COVID-19 同时流行的影响。
Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2021 Feb 26;54:e08372020. doi: 10.1590/0037-8682-0837-2020. eCollection 2021.
5
Effects of Information Veracity and Message Frames on Information Dissemination: A Case Study of 2016 Zika Epidemic Discussion on Twitter.信息真实性和信息框架对信息传播的影响:以 2016 年寨卡疫情在 Twitter 上的讨论为例。
Health Commun. 2021 Nov;36(12):1560-1570. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2020.1773705. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
6
Sexual transmission of Zika virus on Twitter: A depoliticised epidemic.推特上寨卡病毒的性传播:去政治化的传染病。
Glob Public Health. 2020 Nov;15(11):1689-1701. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2020.1768275. Epub 2020 May 21.
7
Dengue, chikungunya and zika virus coinfection: results of the national surveillance during the zika epidemic in Colombia.登革热、基孔肯雅热和寨卡病毒合并感染:哥伦比亚寨卡疫情期间全国监测结果。
Epidemiol Infect. 2019 Jan;147:e77. doi: 10.1017/S095026881800359X.
8
Clinical relevance of Zika symptoms in the context of a Zika Dengue epidemic.寨卡症状在寨卡登革热流行中的临床意义。
J Infect Public Health. 2020 Feb;13(2):173-176. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2019.07.006. Epub 2019 Aug 6.
9
Contrasting Misinformation and Real-Information Dissemination Network Structures on Social Media During a Health Emergency.社交媒体在健康突发事件中错误信息与真实信息传播网络结构的对比
Am J Public Health. 2020 Oct;110(S3):S340-S347. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305854.
10
Harnessing Dengue Rapid Diagnostic Tests for the Combined Surveillance of Dengue, Zika, and Chikungunya Viruses in Laos.利用登革热快速诊断检测来联合监测老挝的登革热、寨卡和基孔肯雅病毒。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020 Jun;102(6):1244-1248. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.19-0881.

引用本文的文献

1
Readability analysis of breast cancer resources shared on X-implications for patient education and the potential of AI.X 上分享的乳腺癌资源的可读性分析——对患者教育的启示及人工智能的潜力
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2025 Aug 6. doi: 10.1007/s10549-025-07799-z.
2
Digital Support for Renal Patients Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Examining the Efforts of Singapore Social Service Agencies in Facebook.新冠疫情之前及期间为肾病患者提供的数字支持:审视新加坡社会服务机构在脸书上所做的努力
Front Big Data. 2021 Sep 14;4:737507. doi: 10.3389/fdata.2021.737507. eCollection 2021.
3
Digital Data Sources and Their Impact on People's Health: A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews.
数字数据源及其对人们健康的影响:系统评价的系统评价。
Front Public Health. 2021 May 5;9:645260. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.645260. eCollection 2021.