Suppr超能文献

队列作为人体集合和人群社区:来自 SEARCH010/RV254 研究队列的见解。

Cohorts as collections of bodies and communities of persons: insights from the SEARCH010/RV254 research cohort.

机构信息

Department of Social Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, 347A MacNider, 333 South Columbia Street, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7240, USA.

Departments of Population Health Sciences and Medicine, School of Medicine, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, 215 Morris Street, Durham, NC 27701.

出版信息

Int Health. 2020 Nov 9;12(6):584-590. doi: 10.1093/inthealth/ihaa060.

Abstract

Longitudinal research cohorts are uniquely suited to answer research questions about morbidity and mortality. Cohorts may be comprised of individuals identified by specific conditions or other shared traits. We argue that research cohorts are more than simply aggregations of individuals and their associated data to meet research objectives. They are social communities comprised of members, investigators and organizations whose own interests, identities and cultures interact and evolve over time. The literature describes a range of scientific and ethical challenges and opportunities associated with cohorts. To advance these deliberations, we report examples from the literature and our own research on the Thai SEARCH010/RV254 cohort, comprising individuals diagnosed with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) during acute infection. We reflect on the impact of cohort experiences and identity, and specifically how people incorporate cohort participation into meaning making associated with their diagnosis, the influence of cohort participation on decision making for early-phase clinical trials recruited from within the cohort, and the impact of the relationships that exist between researchers and participants. These data support the concept of cohorts as communities of persons, where identity is shaped, in part, through cohort experiences. The social meanings associated with cohorts have implications for the ethics of cohort-based research, as social contexts inevitably affect the ways that ethical concerns manifest.

摘要

纵向研究队列特别适合回答有关发病率和死亡率的研究问题。队列可以由具有特定条件或其他共同特征的个体组成。我们认为,研究队列不仅仅是为了满足研究目标而将个体及其相关数据简单地聚集在一起。它们是由成员、研究人员和组织组成的社会社区,其自身的利益、身份和文化随着时间的推移相互作用和演变。文献描述了与队列相关的一系列科学和伦理挑战和机遇。为了推进这些讨论,我们报告了文献中的示例以及我们自己对泰国 SEARCH010/RV254 队列的研究,该队列由在急性感染期间被诊断出感染人类免疫缺陷病毒 (HIV) 的个体组成。我们反思了队列经验和身份的影响,特别是人们如何将队列参与纳入与他们的诊断相关的意义构建中,队列参与对从队列中招募的早期临床试验决策的影响,以及研究人员和参与者之间存在的关系的影响。这些数据支持队列作为人群社区的概念,其中身份部分是通过队列经验塑造的。与队列相关的社会意义对基于队列的研究的伦理学有影响,因为社会背景不可避免地会影响伦理问题表现的方式。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

6
How Payment for Research Participation Can Be Coercive.研究参与付费可能具有强制性。
Am J Bioeth. 2019 Sep;19(9):21-31. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2019.1630497.
9
Ethical issues in HIV remission trials.HIV 缓解试验中的伦理问题。
Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2018 Sep;13(5):422-427. doi: 10.1097/COH.0000000000000489.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验